...For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i. e., of prostitution both public and private. Marx 339-340)

The communist manifesto clearly demonstrates that ideals that regard women and men, through the eyes of economic marriage partnership is abhorrent to the natural state, a satire in the subtle irony of Pride and Prejudice, is clear. Marx would likely not have looked favorably at the message of Austin's works, but as an intelligent man he might have looked between the lines, as modern readers do and seen the subtle cultural assassination within it.

Pride and Prejudice. Ed. James Kinsley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Gilman, Priscilla. "Disarming Reproof": Pride and Prejudice and the Power of Criticism." Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal (2000): 218.

Marx, Karl. Capital, the Communist Manifesto and Other Writings. Ed. Max Eastman. New York: The Modern Library, 1959.

Park, You-Me, and Rajeswari Sunder Rajan, eds. The Postcolonial Jane Austen. London: Routledge, 2000.

A www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5000450798

Ryals, Clyde De L. "Recent Studies in the Nineteenth Century." Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 36.4 (1996): 934.

Watkins, Daniel P. A Materialist Critique of English Romantic Drama. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1993.