Abortion Philosophy The Utilitarian Debate Thesis

Such prohibition, Bentham contended, would be a contradiction to the preservation of individual rights. He even goes so far as to signal the necessity for a change in approach to contending with any questions regarding the prescription of rights, here channeled through the words of John Stuart Mill. The remarks seem directed in their derisive tone at the unempirical thinkers espousing the Law of Nature as a singular lens for evaluating human rights. "Instead of taking up their opinions by intuition, or by ratiocination from premises adopted on a mere rough view, and couched in language so vague that it is impossible to say exactly whether they are true or false, philosophers are now forced to understand one another, to break down the generality of their propositions, and join a precise issue in every dispute." (Mill, 1)

Guided by the central principle that morality may defined as the creation, extension or preservation of happiness for the largest number of people at all times, Mill's ideas are conceptually incompatible as well with the idea that government might be able to enforce a prohibition...

...

This is to indicate that there is a fundamentally irrational overarching premise to the idea that abortion could be controlled through governance, especially given that many of the core arguments in favor of such control proceed from a position which cannot be argued but which must be believed. This is the type of vagueness at which Mill balks, perceiving this as an intentional mode of obfuscation to as to enable moral control.
Quite so, the debate on abortion suggests a concerted interest by those parties subscribed to the pro-life agenda to invoke a common acceptance of a single moral position. This is the type of imperative that runs directly counterintuitive to the ethical pragmatism demanded by the utilitarian perspective.

Works Cited:

California Medical Association (CMA). (1973). Where We Stand -- CMA Position Papers: Abortion. Western Journal of Medicine, 116(6), 42-59.

Mill, J.S. (1838). Bentham. London and Westminster Review. Online at http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/bentham

Rachels, J. (1993). The Utilitarian Approach. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, pg.

91-101. New York: McGraw Hill.

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

California Medical Association (CMA). (1973). Where We Stand -- CMA Position Papers: Abortion. Western Journal of Medicine, 116(6), 42-59.

Mill, J.S. (1838). Bentham. London and Westminster Review. Online at http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/bentham

Rachels, J. (1993). The Utilitarian Approach. The Elements of Moral Philosophy, pg.

91-101. New York: McGraw Hill.


Cite this Document:

"Abortion Philosophy The Utilitarian Debate" (2009, May 28) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/abortion-philosophy-the-utilitarian-debate-21539

"Abortion Philosophy The Utilitarian Debate" 28 May 2009. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/abortion-philosophy-the-utilitarian-debate-21539>

"Abortion Philosophy The Utilitarian Debate", 28 May 2009, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/abortion-philosophy-the-utilitarian-debate-21539

Related Documents

Abortion is a polarizing issue. The debate divides families as well as politicians. However, I am all too well aware of the fact that there are many individual stories that are far more complex than the black-and-white shades in which the issue is presented by the media. Take the example of the aunt of one of my best friends from high school. My friend's aunt became pregnant: this was joyous news

Bioethics Abortion ranks amongst the most widely questionable subjects examined and discussed all through the world today. Is it accurate to say that it is legitimate? Is it precise to say that it is not an ethical decision? These are simply a couple of the inquiries that arise thereto. One thought is that fetus removal is thought to be reasonable when viewed through the utilitarian viewpoint. The discussion that follows

Nurses and the Ethics of Abortion Abortion and Virtue Ethics In the Crossfire: Nurses and the Ethics of Abortion In the Crossfire: Nurses and the Ethics of Abortion Nebraska's Attorney General, Jon Bruning, announced his efforts to revoke the license of the only nurse working at Dr. LeRoy Carhart's abortion clinic in a suburb of Omaha (Funk, 2013). The revocation proceedings are based on allegations of substandard care and the delegation of patient care

This would make the resource pool of charity large enough for the deprived sections of the society. 2): On the issue of morality Singer in his writing refers about the Brazilian film Central Station in which Dora, a poor retired school teacher gets an opportunity to earn $1,000 by handing over a 9-year-old homeless boy to an address where the boy will be fostered by wealthy foreigners. She hands over

Consequently, the underlying concept regarding the two different arguments is the actual point for the beginning of life. Through the application of several ethical theories, stem cell research is unethical because of the following reasons: Respect to All Persons: Based on the utilitarian ethical theory or principle, stem cell research is unethical because it violates the need to respect all individuals and provide the greatest happiness to many people. The emergence

Nursing and Ethics The emotional debate over abortion had been mischaracterized in the media, and hence disrupted any positive attempt to make progress in resolving the ethical and medical problems which have been created by the practice. A majority of Americans recognize and desire that abortion should be available when the life of the mother is at risk, or in the cases of rape or incest. However, liberal proponets like to