Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Canadian is to be British
Between 1867 and 1914, it was said that "to be Canadian is to be British." That was both a strength and a weakness for Canada. It affected how the people in that country felt about themselves. It also affected how the rest of the world thought about Canadians. One of the reasons people believed that Canadians were British was imperialism. Canada wanted to be a successful nation. Many people who lived there thought the only way to do that was through being tied to British imperialism.
Other people disagreed, and said that Canada had to break away and be on its own.
Those people did not think Canada's ideals and beliefs were compatible with the British way of doing things. For more than 30 years, the two groups would argue back and forth about how Canada should be ruled.
Then the First World War broke out, and things changed. Through research into Canadian intellectual history, many ideas about Canadian history can be formed. Whether Canada should be under British rule or on its own was a conflicted and divisive period in history, and one that will not soon be forgotten.
One of the reasons that this issue is so important is because Canada does not have the same sense of nationalism as other places.
It cannot rely on a national language or origin as a way of bringing everyone who lives there together.
While "being Canadian" is really impossible to define, evidence still shows a sense of nationalism among Canadians.
That can be confusing for people who study Canadian history. If there is no specific reason for nationalism, it seems odd that nationalism can be found. Throughout Canada and its history, the people have pulled together to create unity.
One of the most obvious ways to see nationalism is to look at politicians.
Even though they have not always provided the best choices, they have been focused on making Canada a cohesive nation. With proper nationalism, Canada does not need British rule or influence. This is part of what many politicians were trying to show when they made choices they believed were right for Canada. Not everyone agreed, because that is the nature of politics. Still, politicians showed time and time again that nationalism was what mattered to them.
It seemed like they just took a group of people who all lived in the same place, and made them into a real nation. There was resistance, though, because of all the British influence that was still seen before 1914. Many Canadians wanted to remain British, while others wanted to cut ties and be completely independent.
It is difficult to form a completely new nation, even with the best of intentions. Canadian politicians had to struggle to convince Canadian residents that being separate would be the best choice for everyone involved.
As Canada evolved, it had to make more and more choices about self-protection and self-preservation.
When it did that, it naturally pulled further away from the British rule and influence. Some people fought that, but most started to accept it as being a natural progression of things. As more people begin to adopt a national attitude, they understood that they had to take control of their own country.
They needed to protect it, and treat it as their own. When they started to do that, they let go of much of what was British.
That helped Canada adopt a more national attitude, even if they were not originally planning to do that. It was a slow process, but very important.
In 1885, there was a large rebellion.
People who really did not want change took up weapons and planned to stop that change from taking place. For the Metis, it was much like what happened to the Native Americans. New people came in and took what was theirs. They started making changes and laws and rules. The Metis were expected to follow those rules and do what the government said.
That changed their entire way of life. They did not want that life changed, so they decided to fight back against what was happening to them.
Eventually, a treaty was signed with some of the…[continue]
"Canadian And British History" (2014, October 11) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/canadian-and-british-history-192614
"Canadian And British History" 11 October 2014. Web.5 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/canadian-and-british-history-192614>
"Canadian And British History", 11 October 2014, Accessed.5 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/canadian-and-british-history-192614
For the aboriginal population of British Columbia, industrialization and capitalism threatened and later undermined traditional ways of life. Trading was soon replaced by wage labour systems. Shifting from barter to a labour market unraveled the essential social institutions of traditional aboriginal society. Potlatches once served as a "bulwark which enabled the aboriginal people to resist acculturation," (p. 252). Lutz, unlike Kealey or DeLottinville, examines the effects of colonialism on
Canadian National Identity and Canadian Hockey The Canadian administrative system in place has endorsed the national identity of Canada with hockey. Back in 90s, when the then Prime Minister of Canada, Chretien, started trade diplomacy with other countries, he always declared every participant as part of the Canadian Team. In the tenure of the same Prime Minister, an ex-National Hockey League player and icon, Frank Mahovlich was chosen as a senator.
Canadian History Ten thousand years before Europeans set foot on the vast territories now known as Canada, indigenous peoples resided there. In fact, the name "Canada" derives from a native word meaning "village." The first Europeans to land on Canadian soil were Nordic Vikings from Greenland who accidentally discovered the richly forested regions of northern Newfoundland before 1000 and set up small settlements specifically to harvest lumber for their homes in
Largely, this sense of solidarity with the U.S. And a Western Bloc translated into practical reality in the Cold War and has lasted into the present period of the War on Terrorism. This has however not been without exception. During the Reagan years, Canadians were not as much onboard with the pro-U.S. line as leaders such as Britain's Margaret Thatcher. However, doubts such as have been entertained above have had
A head of state could be chosen by indirect election by parliament, as one example. This is similar to the current process, however, in the new process, the Governor-General would be made by provincial or federal legislatures as opposed to being selected by the Prime Minister and then formally appointed by the Queen. Another way to go would be to have the head of state chosen by indirect election by
Canadian History An Analysis as to Why Conscription Was Introduced in Canada during World War II and Why it Was Less Divisive than Conscription during World War I Compulsory military service is certainly nothing new in human affairs, and the practice has almost always been met with widespread resistance by those who are most affected. History has shown time and again that those most who are most directly affected by compulsory military
The substance had devastating effects on them, and, it assisted them into growing more detested by white people. Certain white people engaged in observing native behavior have even observed the aftermath that alcohol had brought upon the Indian society. Some white people have even triggered alarms relating to the fact that Indians were hurriedly becoming wiped out, just as several animal species in Canada. The Native Americans in the U.S.