Good V Evil Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
923
Cite
Related Topics:

God's Existence And Evil Existence God's existence and the existence of evil

When considering William Paley's Argument from Design, St. Thomas Aquinas's Cosmological Argument, and St. Anselm's Ontological Argument, one can only come to one conclusion. As superficial as this might seem for some believers, the conclusion is not that God exists. Sometimes it is better to be superficial, as this provides a person with the ability to see matters from a general perspective. Considering the complexity of things can lead to serious dilemmas, taking into account that as long as someone wants to believe that God exists, the respective individual can go through great efforts with the purpose to come up with a theory that can convince many to accept it. This is exactly what happened in the cases of Paley, Aquinas, and Anselm. These people devised ingenious theories that are hard to contradict by simply relating to the information they provide and that can thus make it difficult and almost impossible for someone to contradict the ideas they are meant to put across.

It would probably make a difference if an argument with regard to the existence of God would be beefed up -- this is practically a means to influence individuals to express...

...

By having people actively involved in interpreting and generally discussing with regard to it, such an argument would be effective. The main idea of a theological argument involves introducing a theory that influences individuals to question it, thus coming to a point where they feel that the argument itself is intriguing. Arguments regarding the existence of God influence individuals to indirectly abandon their principles with the purpose of debating it. The simple fact that they need to go through great efforts in order to combat it means that it works, taking into account that it got people to actually consider it as a hypothesis rather than a concept that is not valid.
Karma is a common concept in Hinduism, Buddhism, and a series of other Asian religions. Instead of providing a complex set of theories regarding how God exists and is responsible for everything that happens in the world, Karma promotes the idea that causality is what makes things happen in the first place. Good deeds lead to individuals experiencing good feedback from the world in general while bad things are likely to lead to a person going through bad experiences. Although this is a more interesting and simpler version of ideas like good and evil, it is still not enough to demonstrate that people should consider evil as a concept that is somehow caused by previous evil events.

Although it is not very different from an argument for the existence of God, karma is somewhat more satisfactory in bringing on the idea that there is…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works cited:

Herman, A.L. (1993). "The Problem of Evil and Indian Thought." Motilal Banarsidass Publ.

Saint Augustine of Hippo. (2008). "The Confessions of Saint Augustine." Filiquarian Publishing, LLC.

"The Book of Job"


Cite this Document:

"Good V Evil" (2014, May 21) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/good-v-evil-189351

"Good V Evil" 21 May 2014. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/good-v-evil-189351>

"Good V Evil", 21 May 2014, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/good-v-evil-189351

Related Documents

An example from the novel that is somewhat opposite to the previous example helps to confirm this interpretation. Glozelle, a high-ranking individual on the evil side of the war that takes place in the novel (these sides are clearly drawn in the frame provided by the author, and need not enter into the debate here), actually turns out to be somewhat helpful to the good side when he betrays

If all falls are "lucky," then we truly live in the best of all possible worlds. While we may avoid accusations of Candidean naivete by announcing that "God" must not exist, this all-or-nothing stance lacks rigor. The persistence of evil is incompatible with certain ideas of God, but in itself this only indicates that our ideas are imperfectly refined. At its best, this approach deepens our definitions of the divine

Good and Evil: The Dual
PAGES 5 WORDS 1556

But when it comes down to the reality of the question as to whether man is good, evil or both by nature, we must heed the message contained in the New Testament which equates traits like "ungodliness," "lawlessness" and especially "evil" as being based upon "moral and spiritual depravity which links sin with Satan" (Peterson, 2004, p. 287). In this respect, man is both good and evil but has the

Evil The free will defense suggests that God permits, but does not cause evil. Therefore, it is possible to live in a universe in which good and evil continually coexist. Human beings are blessed with the ability to make a choice that can further the objectives of God and good, or to promote the interests of evil. Although this view is logically coherent, there are clear objections to it. One objection is

She is helpless and now realizes that she is truly in need of saving. Now, O'Connor seems to be suggesting, she is actually in a position where the Word of God, which actually does promise salvation, may come to her. It speaks of the virtue of humility, which she is now in a position to develop -- not because she realizes it as of yet but because she is

Evil What Is the Nature
PAGES 8 WORDS 2945

Initially St. Augustine favoured the dualistic view that evil was external and separate from the world and mankind that in evident from the Manichean worldview. However, he was later to reject this strict dualism and taker another view of the nature of evil. This was more Platonic and was based on the writings of Plotinus and Porphyry. This refers to the view that evil is a measure and result of