Saddam Hussein the Execution of Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Thus, the execution of Saddam Hussein did mark an important turning point in establishing democracy in Iraq if only because the event was symbolically powerful. Even if the only purpose it served was to maintain American support for the war effort, then the execution can be viewed as a turning point. Even if the execution of Saddam Hussein created the illusion that democracy was budding in Iraq then it was a turning point in the war. The execution of Saddam Hussein was a turning point in Iraq also because the event signified American military prowess. As the figurehead of democracy worldwide, the United States' participation in the capture, trial, and execution of Saddam Hussein painted an attractive picture; Democracy triumphed over Tyranny.

President Bush certainly seemed to believe that the death of Saddam Hussein was a turning point in the war and in the fight for democracy in Iraq. The president was quoted as saying, "Bringing Saddam Hussein to justice will not end the violence in Iraq, but it is an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy that can govern, sustain and defend itself, and be an ally in the war on terror," (cited by Palmer 2006). Bush also called the coalition-supported Iraqi government as a "young democracy," (cited by Democracy Now!). Saddam's death bolstered the image of that young democracy. With Saddam gone, it was possible to move on and rebuild the war-torn nation. Burns & Santora (2006) note that "high-ranking Shiite politicians represented the hanging as a turning point" just as Bush did. Even though no substantial, reliable, long-lasting democratic institutions have yet to be established in Iraq, the elimination of the ultimate icon of tyranny was an important milestone.

A blog, supposedly authored by an Iraqi citizen, claims "we are moving forward," "Iraq will be built in a democratic fashion," and "despite all the violence, carnage, and negativity, the Iraqi people continue on the path to freedom," (Husayn 2005). Indeed, freedom and democracy would not be possible if its central icon continued to hold sway over his supporters. Gerecht (2007) is equally as optimistic, noting that "politically, Iraq is coming alive again. A Shiite-led Iraqi democracy is taking root -- an astonishing achievement given the concerted efforts of the Iraqi Sunnis, and the surrounding Sunni Arab states, to attack and delegitimize the new Iraq." Even if the current and future American administration must buttress the young democracy, the emerging form of government would in theory be preferable to the brutal regime of a dictator convicted of crimes against humanity.

One of the most promising signs that democracy is taking root is Iraq's glorious past: a history of one of the world's most ancient civilizations that has at times been a bastion of democratic ideals and a powerhouse of learning. As Davis (2005) notes, "Iraq has a tradition and history of democracy that can help promote the successful establishment of a democratic form of government in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq." In fact, the roots of democracy run deep in Mesopotamian soil. Furthermore, the first half of the twentieth century promised to bring another golden age to Iraq. The clerical governments post-colonization revealed "strong democratic impulses and emphasized cultural tolerance," (Davis 2005). With democratic ideology entrenched in Iraqi culture and with the promise of continued support from the United States, Iraq does stand poised to enter a new era of freedom and democracy.

The execution of Saddam Hussein was a necessary turning point on the path toward freedom in Iraq. Although the capture, trial, and execution of the dictator was largely a propaganda ploy, its message did serve to reintroduce the Iraqi people to their roots as a democratic civilization. However, bloody the affair might be, the war in Iraq showed that the Iraqi people could depend on the support of the most powerful democracy in the world to help establish democratic institutions such as reliable legislatures, judiciaries, schools, and economic institutions. The execution's symbolism served its purpose well.


Burns, J.F. & Santora, M. (2006). The execution of Saddam Hussein: Iraqi leaders say hanging is turning point for nation. San Francisco Chronicle. Dec 31, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Chideya, F. (2007). Roundtable: Saddam Hussein's Execution, Confederate Statues. NPR. Audio retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Davis, E. (2005). Strategies for Promoting Democracy in Iraq. United States Institute of Peace. Oct 2005. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Gerecht, R.M. (2007). On Democracy in Iraq: It's starting to take root. The Weekly Standard. Apr 30, 2007. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Husayn. Democracy in Iraq (Is Here!). Blog. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Hussein execution: World reaction." Dec 30, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Karadsheh, J. & Raman, a. (2006). Iraqis react with joy, anger to Hussein death sentence. Nov 5, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Palmer, J. (2006). Saddam Hussein executed. USA Today. Dec 30, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Raman, a.D., Chilcote, R., Dagher, S., Karadsheh, J. & Henry, E. (2006). Hussein executed with 'fear in his face'. World. Dec 30, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Reynolds, P. (2003). Analysis: Turning point for Iraq? BBC News. Dec 14, 2003. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Sabbah, Z. (2006). What are Iraqis saying? Death of a Dictator. Special report in USA Today. Dec 30, 2006. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at

Saddam aides 'to die this week'." BBC News. Jan 7, 2008. Retrieved Jun 11, 2008 at[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Saddam Hussein The Execution Of" (2008, June 12) Retrieved November 28, 2016, from

"Saddam Hussein The Execution Of" 12 June 2008. Web.28 November. 2016. <>

"Saddam Hussein The Execution Of", 12 June 2008, Accessed.28 November. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Post War Iraq a Paradox in the Making Legitimacy vs Legality

    Post War Iraq: A Paradox in the Making: Legitimacy vs. legality The regulations pertaining to the application of force in International Law has transformed greatly from the culmination of the Second World War, and again in the new circumstances confronting the world in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War. Novel establishments have been formed, old ones have withered away and an equally enormous quantity of intellectual writing has

  • Torture and Abuse of Gays

    These responsibilities notwithstanding, the American public was already being conditioned to view the war in Iraq as a battle against extremists, that is, against the Islamist radicals who had threatened the "American" way" of life on September 11, 2001. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson had already inflamed America's own Christian fundamentalists with talk that the terrible events of that day were to blame in part on "the gays and

  • U S Invaded Iraq in 2003 Why U S

    U.S. INVADED IRAQ IN 2003 Why U.S. Invade Iraq 2003 invasion of Iraq has a number of forceful effects that relate to the influence of the 9/11 occurrence in the country. The then U.S. president who happened to have been President Bush pushed for the U.S. invasion of Iraq amidst the actions that Saddam had done to the U.S. In most avenues of performance, it is clear that the U.S. attack

  • Front Page War How Media Complicity

    The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, (George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan. 28, 2003) the claims were quickly picked up and repeated by the media. So were claims that Iraq had nuclear weapons. "We believe [Hussein] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." (Dick Cheney, NBC's Meet the Press, March 16, 2003) Yet, after the search for

  • Iraq Exit No Exit America s

    S. from the preparation and supervision of the coming elections . . . during this period, the training of Iraqi forces might, of necessity, remain a coalition task, but it ought to be monitored and supervised by the U.N." (Hoffmann & Bozo, 113) It is clear though that at this juncture, the world community is not yet prepared to take control of the operation. The presence of U.S. forces is a

  • Machiavelli s The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli

    " Parallels with business takeovers are frighteningly stark. Change. In the Prince he says "It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things" (Machiavelli). Relevancy...and Not The impact of Machiavelli's writing on politics has been accepted for some time, but the relevance of his ideas to business had to wait until

  • Gulf War of 1991 The Writer Explores

    Gulf War of 1991. The writer explores the history, the cause, and the war itself. The writer uses several sources to illustrate what the U.S. government bas dints decision to go to war on and how well received that decision was by the American public. As the U.S. gears up for a probable attack on Iraq American minds turn back the hands of time to 1991 and the Gulf War.

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved