Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … social science researchers have a number of different types of research designs available to them, including observational studies, correlational research, developmental designs, survey research and experimental designs (Neuman, 2009). This paper reviews the literature concerning quantitative survey research and experimental designs to provide a comparison of their similarities and differences, including their respective processes for selecting an appropriate population sample. In addition, a description of a respective strength and limitation of each design is followed by a conclusion that can be drawn from this comparison. Finally, an explanation concerning ethical, legal, and social-cultural considerations that may be relevant for these designs is followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning survey and experimental research designs in the conclusion.
Review and Analysis
Two similarities and two differences between the survey and experimental research
Survey and experimental research both use...
In addition, both survey and experimental research seek to collect as much as data as possible from a large population sampling in order to develop a better understanding about the sample as a whole (Grinnel & Unrau, 2005). Survey research, though, differs from experimental research since it is designed to collect primary data only while experimental research examines differences in the outcomes due to introduction of some type of intervention that requires pre- and post-testing (Neuman, 2009). In addition, survey research can assume a number of different forms, including online, face-to-face or by mail or email while experimental research typically requires personal interaction with subjects (De Vaus, 2002). In general, survey researchers seek to collect responses from as many respondents as possible to promote the trustworthiness of their findings while experimental researchers may use fewer subject to confirm or refute their guiding hypotheses (Neuman, 2009).
Strength and limitation of each design
Survey research provides social researchers with the ability to collect data from a large number of respondents in a cost-effective fashion, but this research design is limited by an inability to probe for additional data concerning interesting responses (Neuman, 2009). Conversely, experimental designs can provide social researchers with original findings that may not be obtainable otherwise, but this research design is labor and cost intensive (Mcconville & Chui, 2007).
A conclusion that can drawn from the comparison
Social science researchers must be thoughtful in selecting the appropriate type of research design in order to obtain the type of data that is…
References
De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research. London: UCL Press.
Grinnell, R. M. Jr. & Unrau, Y. A. (2005). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
McConville, M. & Chui, W. H. (2007). Research methods for law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Neuman, W. L. (2009). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, 6th ed. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
E., contemporary or historical issues (Eisenhardt 1989; in Naslund, 2005); (3) the extent of control required over behavioral events in the research context (Yin 1994; as cited in Naslund, 2005); and (4) the researcher's philosophical stance, i.e., his/her understanding of the nature of social reality and how knowledge of that reality can be gained. (Naslund, 2005) Naslund (2005) states that qualitative research methods "primarily create meanings and explanations to research phenomena" and
Non-experimental research designs is a type of study that is essentially uncontrolled. The research has little to no ability to influence the variables at work, and therefore the research cannot be considered a controlled experiment. There are several types of non-experimental research designs, including correlational, descriptive and historical. Different Types of Non-Experimental Research The different types of non-experimental research are bound by the fact that in all cases, the researcher has no
Trochim (2006) states that a quasi-experimental design is one that looks a bit like an experimental design but lacks the key ingredient -- random assignment. He notes that his mentor [Don Campbell] used to refer to quasi-experiments as "queasy" (2006) experiments because they give the experimental purists a queasy feeling. With respect to internal validity, they often appear to be inferior to randomized experiments. But there is something compelling about
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Research is imperative to quality analysis and development of theories. In any science, no matter if it is a physical, psychological, or sociological, research is integral to formulation of working theories. Without research, not only can problems not be solved but problems cannot even be properly determined. Having said that, it is important to understand that there are many different types of research methodology. Not all forms
Comparing and Contrasting Experimental and Correlational Research DesignsThe two research methods are both quantitative research methods. Experimental research designs are mainly used to investigate causal relationships and studying relationships between one variable and another. Correlational research designs mainly try to establish if there is a relationship between two variables. Correlational research is nonexperimental because the researcher will be measuring two variables and assessing their statistical relationship. While experimental research will
Experimental Research Methods in Business Experimental Research Methods The author provides a survey of the literature illustrating applied experimental research methods in cross-sections of business and organization types. The advantages and disadvantages of the experimental research methods are discussed for each of the examples provided which run the gamut from depression-era agricultural economics to research conducted for the National Science Institute. While the article focuses on business research methods, the range of