Film Response to Repentance (1984) Tengiz Abuladze's 1984 motion picture Repentance provides viewers with an abstract perspective on life in a rural area as being disrupted by feelings associated with absurdness, Stalinism, and people's struggle to reach common ground on particular issues. The film puts across a series of principles ranging from a satirical comedy to a means of addressing political topics that were controversial during the 1980s. In spite of the confusion that the film expresses as its storyline progresses, most viewers are probable to experience intense emotions as they become better acquainted with characters and with how they feel about their immediate environment.

While it would be pointless to discuss the film in association with conditions in the Soviet Union during the 1980s, it is intriguing to address matters in Soviet countries that separated from the union as the Iron Curtain fell. Individuals in former Soviet state must have felt inspired as a consequence of seeing the film, taking into account that it went against ideas that were fed to them on a daily basis. These people could identify with characters in the film and could understand the central character, Varlam Aravidze, as being a person who was solely interested in the well-being of the system he was protecting rather than to care about people and about they were oppressed throughout his leadership.

The director uses a somewhat poetic form of expression as he attempts to relate to horrific events in an intriguing way. It is obvious that he found it difficult to address the topics he was interested in directly. As a consequence, he chose to use a series of metaphors and allegories in an attempt to criticize the system in a subtle way. Even with this, he concentrated on showing the gravity of the problem and wanted his viewers to understand the degree to which...

The Christian element in the motion picture relates to pessimism as being part of life. From the moment when the old woman asking for directions is disappointed upon hearing that that particular path does not lead to church viewers are likely to realize that any road will eventually lead to a divine location. God is in charge of judging people eventually, regardless of the fact that he does not act immediately.
Keti is largely the only person who seems to put across stability in the film, as her background and her job are the only real elements the film provides. The woman constantly thinks about how she would react to things if she were in a different position and most of the events in the motion picture happen in her head. She lacks the courage or the power to step in and get locals to actually do something and is thus satisfied with just thinking about how things would be if the world was different.

Imagination is the main idea throughout the movie and the director seems to have wanted to address the pointlessness associated with trying to act during the Stalinist era. It was impossible for someone to actually do something about the system at the time and many people accepted the situation they were in.…