Social Order And Philosophy Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
988
Cite
Related Topics:

Religious Traditions in the Axial Age Aspects of Judaism that made it "axial" during the period from 900 BCE to 300 CE

Judaism spelled an era in the time where there was a worship of many deities, and it brought the idea of worshiping only one deity. Judaism was widespread during this time. It had enough power to influence the people as an umbrella of worship under one deity. The worship of one deity brought about a strengthened responsiveness of human beings and their God. The responsibilities of worshiping one deity were straightened and made to look like capable of transforming whatever was necessary for any true form of worship. The sense of a linear time made people take good responsibility of their deities and everything related to them. The existence of the rival deities was also realized, as people took central of one deity. It was during this time that the acts of Judaism made Hebrew appear to be like a full monotheistic religion as happened in 500 BCE (Strayer and Eric 2016).

Aspects of Confucianism that made it "axial" during the period from 900 BCE to 300 CE

During the period between 900 BCE and 300 BCE, Confucianism brought about the need to have a sensible use of ethics in

...

The philosophy emphasized the creation of social order through the integration of the ethical considerations on a personal level. It was necessary to integrate the ideas of ritual and etiquette. The society had to be harmonious on the individual etiquette as seen during the early Zhou Dynasty. The philosophy helped to establish strong bonds of loyalty and hierarchy by making people embrace the need to be ethical, consider the interests of the other people, respect authority, and observe the order that brings about peace and stability. The philosophy emphasized on its belief that through the observance of the etiquette and ritual, people were educated to have the need to see social order as a fundamental element in every society (Halton 2103). The roles of the people in the society changed during this period. The cutting edge for a change during this time was the human understanding of the social order and the need to accept the society as it is and build from it into the future.
Confucianism brought about the morality of the people. The understanding of the etiquette and ritual made people see life in a different way, observing the tenets of being morally upright. From these tenets, the people were able to figure out the best ways to live together as in unity. Harmony was developed because of the specification of the ethics and human behaviors that were positive. Confucianism developed and advanced the concept that leaders were only able to grow and become true leaders when they embraced the…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Bellah, Robert N. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. Print.

Halton, Eugene. From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution: John Stuart-Glennie, Karl Jaspers, and a New Understanding of the Idea., 2014. Internet resource.

Strayer, Robert W, and Eric Nelson. Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources. 2016. Print.


Cite this Document:

"Social Order And Philosophy" (2016, November 15) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-order-and-philosophy-2163198

"Social Order And Philosophy" 15 November 2016. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-order-and-philosophy-2163198>

"Social Order And Philosophy", 15 November 2016, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/social-order-and-philosophy-2163198

Related Documents

If the public trusts the judges and believes that they are administering justice equally among all people, then there appears to be a mutual respect atmosphere, in which the public adheres to the law willingly. However, if there is distrust of the administration, violence and criminal behavior becomes more prevalent, as the people resist unequal administration of the law. References Moe R.C., Gilmour R.S. (1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: the

Kant and David on Causality; Rousseau and Adam Smith on Social Order Compare and contrast Rousseau and Adam Smith, on the importance of economic or political mark in their account of social order. Rousseau saw the development of organized political life as synonymous with generating social inequality. As "individuals have more contact with one another and small groupings begin to form, the human mind develops language, which in turn contributes to the

Functionalism in Sociology The history of sociology is essentially a series of various competing paradigms and views of society and about how society is constructed as well as its nature and function As Thomas Kuhn pointed out in his groundbreaking work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, all paradigms are to a certain extent influenced by subjective predilections and views and are therefore never truly objective. However functionalism, as one of the

By "personal" and "social" goals, I meant the achievement of ideals set by the individual for himself/herself and for the society in general, respectively. Education and learning gained from it is meaningless if the individual cannot enjoy and optimize it to achieve his/her own needs and aspirations in life. However, similarly, one's success in achieving his/her aspirations becomes irrelevant if these achievements do not benefit society. A recognize the need

He based his theories and ideas on these laws and his property related theories also related to the same ideals. Rousseau differed with Locke in his perception of the ideal government. His work 'Social Contract' dealt with the issues related to governments, society, people and property. "Rousseau was one of the first modern writers to seriously attack the institution of private property, and therefore is sometimes considered a forebear

Social and Political History How do the functionalist and conflict theories relate to the conceptualizations of government and sovereignty presented by Heywood? How much is enough government? What level of government do we need to get our collective business done? How much sovereignty is appropriate for the American government to have, particularly in view of terrorist threats in the post 9/11 environment? When does government and sovereignty interfere with the full