Brain Function And God Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1704
Cite

Relationship of Certainty to God From Descartes Compare With Gassedi, Pascal, and Spinoza The French philosopher Rene Descartes was one of the most transformational figures of his time and his work is now considered one of the pillars of modern Western philosophy. Descartes was the first to eloquently describe the issues that are related to the problem of how the mind and brain function, how they are related, and the mysterious connection that exists that provides the foundation in which human consciousness can exist. Descartes was also skeptical of many of the assumption that were previously taken for granted as truth. For example, Descartes was unsure of how reliable the human senses were at providing reliable interpretations of whatever the external reality that exists happens to be.

Descartes skepticism of the senses serves as a critical component of his overall worldview and how he believed that the external environment and God were related. His theories were meet with a wide spectrum of different responses from many of the contemporary thought leaders of the day such as Gussedi, Pascal, and Spinoza. These individuals disagree in some way about Descartes's idea of Certainty to God based on his theories and used his work as the focus of their own rebuttals. This analysis will provide a brief introduction to the key points that Descartes outlines as well as provide an overview of the spectrum of responses that emerged after Descartes theories were published.

Method and Mediations on First Philosophy

Descartes published his book Mediations on First Philosophy in 1641 in Latin and it was not translated into English until sometime later and to this day it remains as one of the most widely read philosophy texts to this day. One of the primary reasons that this text has been so influential in the field is the strong skeptical perspective that it applies to the whole of reality. After some of his initial works received what might be considered a number of constructive criticisms, Descartes focused on the things that he could know for sure and without doubt and is willing to readily admit that some of the things that he believed during his life could easily have been wrong. When we apply a skeptical lens to what we might consider to be reality, then this perception of reality might easily crumble under the weight of scrutiny.

Descartes was the first...

...

He believed that the mind and brain, although connected, were connected in some manner that cannot necessarily be verified. For example, if there was an all-powerful and omnipotent God, then this God should certainly be able to deceive people in whatever ways they wished according to Descartes; which was the line of thinking that led him to question whether or not we could trust our senses, or to what extent. Yet he believed that our mind-brain interaction helped to form our self-identity and the ways in which we relate to the world.
"I perceive first that I have a head, hands, feet and other members composing that body which I considered as part, or perhaps even as the whole, of myself. I perceive further, that that body was placed among many others, by which it was capable of being affected in diverse ways, both beneficial and hurtful; and what was beneficial I remarked by a certain sensation of pleasure, and what was hurtful by a sensation of pain. And besides this pleasure and pain, I was likewise conscious of hunger, thirst, and other appetites, as well as certain corporeal inclinations toward joy, sadness, anger, and similar passions" (Descartes, Meditation VI).

For example, Descartes believes that our stomachs may provide information to our minds to give it a cue to address the hunger that is present and there is no doubt that they are connected in some manner. However, the exact relationship between the mind and the body is far from certain and this insight was one of Descartes greatest contribution to philosophy. It's a problem that continues to exist despite all the advances of modern technology as contemporary researchers still have not cracked the exact mechanisms that serve to create the relationship.

Beyond this contribution, Descartes theories that built upon this foundation were heavily disputed, both then and now, by philosophers about the concept of God and how it interacts with reality. Descartes used the foundation to attribute different kinds of substances that existed which included infinite and finite thinking substances as well as infinite and finite material substances (Mahon, J., N.d.). He believed that God was the only thing in eternal existence and that God create all of the subsequent substances which were finite in nature. Descartes believes that since the mind and body are apparently two distinct…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Mahon, J. (N.d.). Descartes vs. Spinoza on Substance and Attributes. Retrieved from Washington & Lee: http://home.wlu.edu/~mahonj/Spinoza.Descartes.htm

Spinoza, B. (n.d.). The Ethics.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2013, November 18). Perre Gassendi. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gassendi/

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2016, July 4). Baruch Spinoza. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza/
Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. (2012, November 6). Pascal's Wager. Retrieved from Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/


Cite this Document:

"Brain Function And God" (2016, October 18) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/brain-function-and-god-2162620

"Brain Function And God" 18 October 2016. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/brain-function-and-god-2162620>

"Brain Function And God", 18 October 2016, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/brain-function-and-god-2162620

Related Documents

Brain The left and right brain The left brain vs. The right brain: How does this impact learning The left brain vs. The right brain: How does this impact learning People often categorize themselves or others as left brained or right brained. This is based on the functions of brain. It is said that the people using right brain more emotions oriented, intuitive, creative, imaginative and subjective. On the other hand, the left brain

Rethinking the Universe Conflicts between religion and science are neither new nor novel. In the 1600s, Galileo was hauled before a court and convicted of heresy for saying (and publishing) that the earth revolved around the sun instead of the opposite. There have been trials on the teaching of evolution, controversies about physics and even states that battle schools and parents for including certain scientific concepts in the public school curriculum.

Music The field of music therapy is an emerging one in medical practice. Nevertheless, there is a growing body of research to support the use of music therapy in a wide range of instances, one of which includes patients who are suffering from brain injury. This paper will review some of the literature on the subject in an attempt to understand how music affects the brain and is therefore useful in

Mind and the Brain There are several theories that have been proposed for explaining the relationship between one's mind and brain. If truth be told, it can be said that it is one of the most talked about philosophical fields. Mind vs. Brain Mind and brain are interrelated. For a majority of people, there is no difference between the two. Many scientists and philosophers hold the belief that the brain and the mind

Religion in the God Part
PAGES 2 WORDS 655

The Humanistic Faith proposes neither a concept of deity nor a concept of Evil. We allow each individual practitioner to conceive of God in whatever way best suits their personality or cultural environment with the one caveat: that God never suggests that one person or group of people are superior or inferior to any other. Sexism and other social biases will not be tolerated by the Humanistic Faith. Our rituals are

Leibniz According to Leibnez, God has the potential to envision, conceive, and create an infinite number of possible worlds. From this infinite potential God selects the best one(s) to create. Leibnez suggests that God uses reason to consciously select the world that has the fullest creative potential, the most multiplicity, and ultimately, the least amount of evil. Leibnez suggests that the world in which we live must have been the best