Jesus then said to her, "Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin" (John 8:11).
Because the woman was not stoned in the end, many interpret it to mean that Jesus changed Mosaic law and then this argument is extended to capital punishment in general. However, Jesus still left the opportunity for her to be stoned. If one of the people in the crowd had been without sin, then the woman would have still been stoned. He did not tell them not to stone her, he only set a condition on who should cast the first stone. He said nothing about the second or third stone, only the first. Luckily, for the woman, there were no qualified takers who could cast the first stone. Therefore, Jesus did not abolish capital punishment in this passage. Instead, he raised the bar for those who are making the decisions to punish others. They should lead their lives free from sin, if they are going to punish the sins of others. Therefore, Jesus did not attempt to change Mosaic Law or to abolish capital punishment. The practice of capital punishment still remained a practice that was mandated by law.
Romans 13:2-4 states that, "God's vengeance is in the hands of the civil government." Therefore, the state should mandate capital punishment as a tool to use for God to carry out his punishment of the unjust. Regardless of the Biblically based arguments, there are still those who argue that capital punishment is unjust from a Christian perspective. For instance, Christians who accept humanistic and evolutionary concepts also argue for the loss of personal accountability for one's actions (Moyer). However, this argument is not Biblically based. Nowhere in the Bible does God eliminate personal accountability for one's sins and actions against man. Furthermore, as we found from an examination of the Old Testament, capital punishment is clearly called for in the Bible.
Positions that do not support the death penalty attempt to base their arguments on the Bible. One of the key arguments that is used by this faction is that Kind David was not put to death for his capital crimes. The verse most widely quoted on the subject reads, "As the Lord lives, surely the man who has done this deserves to die" (2 Sam 12:5). The reasons for David's exoneration are situational and cannot be taken as a blanket rejection of capital punishment. David was one of God's chosen and he acted in accordance to God's wishes. Sometimes a person's job is to carry out God's punishment and judgment on earth.
The most widely used argument against the death penalty is that the state if committing murder in violation of the mandate that, "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13). However, the words "to murder" are used 49 times in the Old Testament, always in reference to premeditated murder (Anderson). However, the prescribed punishment for breaking this commandment was death (Numbers 35:16-21). Therefore, the act of carrying out a death penalty is not the same as murder by the state. This is one of the most widely posed arguments by Christians who are opposed to the death penalty, but it only stands as a valid argument when taken out of context. When placed within its proper context, this proves to be an invalid argument and the Bible continues to support the death penalty.
Support for the death penalty differs among various denominations. For instance, nearly 74% of evangelical Protestants...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now