Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Tricyclic antidepressant use to mitigate chronic low back pain has been investigated by researchers as a form of treatment for decades. Some articles go as far back as 1986. The types of antidepressants tested for efficacy in treatment of chronic low back pain have been either tricyclic or tetracyclic. Systematic reviews from twelve years ago noted antidepressants treat pain via inhibition of norepinephrine reuptake (Staiger, Gaster, Sullivan, & A Deyo, 2003. Antidepressants that failed to inhibit norepinephrine reuptake did not provide any benefit in pain relief. New modalities of treatment with antidepressants use not just one, but a combination of tricyclic antidepressants like Pregabalin and Amitriptyline.
Pregabalin, otherwise known as Lyrica, is a nerve pain medication. Uses for the drug include treatment of seizures, fibromyalgia and nerve and muscle pain. Amitripyline (Elavil), is a standard treatment for depression and works as a never pain medication. Some medical practitioners have also prescribed the drug for insomnia (Atkinson & Sullivan, 2013).
These drugs have been reviewed as treatment separately or together. Drugs that treat nerve pain are important because chronic lower back pain consists of mainly neuropathic or nerve pain like sciatica or lumbar radiculopathy (Jacobson et al., 2015). If drugs like Pregabalin and Amitriptyline can be used to diminish nerve pain, this would be the most likely treatment option for chronic lower back pain. The strategies focus on seeing if Pregabalin or Amitriptyline work as a main treatment option for chronic lower back pain or if Pregabalin and Amitriptyline work best together.
The search strategy uses Pregabalin and Amitriptyline as main keywords, allowing search results to produce current (less than five years old) articles that show efficacy of either or, and dual treatment options. Along with the use of these two, main keywords, antidepressants and chronic low back pain were also used to highlight previous and current use of antidepressants for the treatment of chronic lower back pain.
The first article covers antidepressant use in those that suffer from lower back pain among other treatment options. Interestingly the treatment option of antidepressants was not used primarily for pain management. Instead, the common reason for prescription of antidepressants...
" . . . because older patients with chronic LBP are commonly associated with depression or anxiety, it is not uncommon for them to take antidepressants or benzodiazepines" (Wong, Karppinen, & Samartzis, 2017, p. 7).
It is important to include a review like this because it shows what the common treatment options are for chronic lower back pain (LBP). The researchers state the main aim for conventional pain management of geriatric patients that present with nonmalignant pain is maintaining a steady concentration of analgesic (for example, acetaminophen) in the blood stream. If this treatment option does not work, convention methods suggest non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). "In addition, the guideline also suggests that if acetaminophen cannot control pain, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g., COX-2 therapy or non-acetylated salicylates) may be used as adjunct therapy" (Wong, Karppinen, & Samartzis, 2017, p. 4).
Such use of drugs can lead to adverse effects in patients. The article notes use of Tramadol can increase potential seizure activity in vulnerable populations. Moreover, NSAIDS can cause stomach problems and exacerbate peptic ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding. The article demonstrates a need for better treatment options that are not only more effective, but also provide less side effects.
The next article attempts to determine the efficacy of Pregabalin or Amitriptyline in the treatment of chronic LBP. The article shows that prior research has never tackled a head-on comparison of both drugs in relieving pain and disability. The study included patients with chronic LBP or chronic lower back ache (CLBA). Patients were between the ages of 15 and 65 years old (Kalita, Kohat, Misra, & Bhoi, 2014). The main outcome for the study was pain relief with the secondary outcome being reduction in Oswestery Disability Index (ODI).
From the 200 patients used in the study 103 were given Amitriptyline and 97, Pregabalin. "The VAS score and ODI improved significantly following AMT and PG at 6 and 14 weeks compared to baseline. The improvement in pain (57.3% Vs 39.2%; P = 0.01) and disability (65% Vs 49.5%; P = 0.03) however was more in AMT group. The composite side effects were similar…
References
Atkinson, J. H., & Sullivan, M. D. (2013). Antidepressant Analgesics in Pain Management. Encyclopedia of Pain, 165-175. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28753-4_247
Jacobson, E. E., Meleger, A. L., Bonato, P., Wayne, P. M., Langevin, H. M., Kaptchuk, T. J., & Davis, R. B. (2015). Structural Integration as an Adjunct to Outpatient Rehabilitation for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, 1-19. doi:10.1155/2015/813418
Kalita, J., Kohat, A., Misra, U., & Bhoi, S. (2014). An open labeled randomized controlled trial of pregabalin versus amitriptyline in chronic low backache. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 342(1-2), 127-132. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.002
Kanukula, R., Bansal, D., & Ghai, B. (2014). Efficacy And Safety Of Combination Of Pregabalin And Amitriptyline In Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain In Indian Population. Value in Health, 17(3), A224. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.1312
Spine-health.com/topics/conserv/pilates/pilates01.html) Just adding this simple group of exercises to what you already do for fitness, or as an entirely new fitness regimen will develop a strong balanced set of core muscles that will be much more resistant to lower back stress and strain, and will likely improve or even eliminate lower back pain. Case Study: Jack Jack (age 49) presented for chronic lower back pain that had been reoccurring over the past several
PICOT Question Introduction Low back pain is a common health challenge for both active and former military service members. Among the military veterans, low back pain places higher risk and has been indicated to be bear the potential for long-term disability (Bagg et al., 2017). There is a lack of effective treatment strategies, and thus, military veterans rely on pain management strategies and other medical strategies, e.g., medical imaging, opioids, injections, and
Hospice caregivers have moral obligations to the patient and the patient's caregivers. The author clarifies that in the hospice, the patient's family members are, in fact, the primary caregivers under the situation. The best that nurses can do is to use strategies, which will incorporate family members into delivering the best palliative care possible. Failure to achieve the best results can create much moral anguish and sense of failure
Pain Management of Obstetric Patients DEALING WITH BIRTH PAINS Causes and Management Intervention Two Sources of Pain Pain is classified into nociceptive or neuropathic (ICEA, 2014). Nociceptive pain develops from tissue, muscle or bones. It is dull, aching, burning, stretching or beating. It crosses through mylenated nerve fibers. Neuropathic pain, on the other hand, emanates from the nerves when some damage has been inflicted on them (ICEA, 2014). It may be chronic when it
This is because every person has a different pain management need. Therefore, there is a need to have a bio-psycho-social-spiritual approach to the management of chronic pain. The four components of the experience of pain by the patient are as follows. The first component is the physical sensation that is felt. Second are the automatic thoughts that come as a result of the gross pain being experienced. Third are
The practice of manipulative thrust therapy can be dangerous and cases of injuries and tragic events have been recorded. Cases of vertebral artery dissection (VAD) have been recorded in people that had the cervical spine manipulation technique done and research on the cases from 1966 to 1993 concluded 30% could be attributed to the procedure (Cleland 2007). VADs are spontaneous and can be normally present at the initial onset of