Which of the three branches of government (Congress, the Presidency, and the Supreme Court) most closely resembles the expectations of the framers of the Constitution, and which of the three differs most from the framers expectations?
The framers of the constitution were a varied and eclectic mix of individuals. Although they often had their personal differences of opinion, many had very similar beliefs as it relates to government and the freedom of those it was to govern. Here, the tyranny of European rule had become very acute in the lives of many colonials at the time. Their rule, even from an ocean away was absolute and unwavering. Many colonials become furious at the excessive taxation and pilfering of resources for the land in which they had labored on for so long. For example the stamp act, which passed 1765, gave European government a large amount of authority to tax a variety of goods and services essential to the colonials at the time. In addition, this act was passed primary to pay the massive debts incurred by Britain during the war with France that occurred in prior years. The tax forced colonials to not only purchase British goods, but also to pay a tax on the items purchased. Thankfully, Benjamin Franklin was able to get the tax rescinded just a few months after its enactment. However, this proved to be the precursor to the overall framing of the three branches of government. This would later culminate into other invasive acts such as the Townshend acts of 1767, the Boston Massacre in 1770, and the Boston Tea Party in 1773. In each of these instances, an oppressive government looked to exert unilateral authority on colonials without having representation from the party subject to the laws or provisions. In addition, with the case with the Boston Massacre, British leaders were often given special treatment and provisions as compared to colonials. In many cases, these acts not only restricted the personal freedoms of others but also their economic freedoms. For example the Coercive Acts of 1774 restricted the movement of goods and services in repose to the Boston Tea Party in 1773. This ultimately impacted the economic freedoms of many colonials which again was a driving factor in…manner that harms American civilization. As a result, congress most resembles the expectations of the framers of the constitution (Bond, 1998).
Likewise, the presidency least resembles the goals and ambitions of the framers of the constitution. As noted in the introduction, many of the act leading up to the industrial revolution were primarily perpetrated by one British leader. Not only were all of the acts mentioned heavily skewed toward the benefit of the British, they were often enacted without regard for those impacted. The president to a certain extent can embody these ordeals if selected unwisely. We have seen this on numerous occasions with Barrack Obama and Donald Trump. Here, the action of Executive Order, has given the president power to enact certain policies that have little regard for the congressional processes. These acts although well intentioned can be used to harm society if left unchecked similar to those of the acts mentioned in the introduction. As a result of this power and the high regard given to the presidency, it is the branch of government that least resembles the ambitions of the framers of the constitution (Osgood, 1997).
Constitution The United States Constitution is based on the self-interest view of human nature. It was created to provide people with a large number of freedoms. When the Founding Fathers sat down to write it, they carefully considered all the issues that they and their fellow countrymen had faced when they were still in England, before they came to America to have the freedoms they wanted (Billias, 2009). Because they knew
Constitution for a Club Rules and laws are a vital component of any civilized society. No human community can function effectively without them. All areas of life are governed by some sort of rule. In general society, for example, there are governmental laws in the form of the constitution and the law. There are also rules in the workplace and at school, as well as in less formal environments such as
As a result, the Bill of Rights was implemented into the Constitution, to address the concerns of anti-federalists. While at the same time, it gave the federalists a strong central government that could adjust with: the various changes. This is significant, because it shows how the Constitution is a working document that seeks to provide a balance between: personal freedoms and the need to protect the nation. In many ways,
Male voters had to own property. Thus voting was still the province of land-holding elites rather than all the people under the rule of constitutional, national, and state law. The fact that Senators were appointed by the state legislature not only allocated more rights to the states as desired by Southerners, but also further filtered the popular voice, as expressed in the House of Representatives. The Electoral College system
Constitution Collective Bargaining -- Labor relations Topic: constitution a national union Essay Question: What importance constitution a national union? How dictate internal government procedures union? Essay 250 words length APA format. What is the importance of the constitution of a national union? How does it dictate the internal government and procedures of the union? The constitution of a national union dictates the rules that member unions must follow if these branches are to
Constitution / Democracy For a fully-functioning democracy to work well as a government process, one must remember that the requirement of checks and balances must be in place, otherwise the threat of an oligarchy or -- at worst case scenario -- a tyranny can displace said democracy. The creation of the Bill of Rights and the formation of the U.S. Constitution, then, is an inevitable process and the document that constitutes