Public Transport Subsidies Public transportation represents an example of a social policy that has some economic implications as well. A typical public transportation system will carry with it varying degrees of self-sufficiency. In some cities, fares are held low through heavy subsidies, while in other cities fares are higher and the system a lot closer to being self-sustaining. As with any public good, there are costs and benefits to the public associated with it. The costs tend to be fairly evident, as they are the direct costs associated with running the system -- vehicles, staff, transit centers and other infrastructure. In addition to these direct costs, there are indirect costs. Financing the system via subsidy requires using taxes, or lieu of taxes, borrowing. Both of these come with costs. Taxes represent money taken from one area of the economy -- consumer spending or saving, and applied to government spending. Borrowing -- many public budgets are unbalanced -- only increases the tax burden by virtue of interest payments. So the indirect costs relate to the financing of the system. Tax monies can...
Even if tax monies remain in the public sector, there are alternative things in which to invest other than public transport, so there are public investment opportunity costs to consider where transit subsidies are concerned. Litman (2015) notes that caution must be undertaken when examining the costs of public transport -- for example a decision by government to issue bonds is not necessary incremental to the decision to subsidize transport, so it may not be reasonable to include financing costs.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now