Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Fetal Abnormality and Decision Making
In the case sturdy presented, the fetus with physical abnormalities and down syndrome is surrounded by four people who want to make decision on the possibility of keeping or terminating the life. The first person is the doctor who presents the facts as they are and advices on medically assisted abortion as a viable and scientifically accepted option and wants Jessica to make a choice depending on what she feels like despite the moral questions raised by the relatives and the husband. This is an argument derived from the postmodern approach to medicine where the individual choices are determined by the patient himself having known all the factors surrounding their condition. The pro-choice advocacy has been in the limelight over the last decade and the direction of the pregnancy has been argued to be the absolute choice of the mother (Pro-Choice Action Network, 2016).
Marco on the other hand is given in to the choice that Jessica will make. He decides that he will support Jessica in upholding the decision or the choice that makes most sense and is most comfortable with Jessica psychologically and physically despite it being a possible economic challenge. He adopted the Act Utilitarian where the guiding principles are derived from the divine commandments (Shakil A., 2016). Under this theory, the guiding religious laws give what a person should not do like steal, kill, lie and so forth. Since the baby had been formed and could be seen to lack limbs, abortion at this stage would be considered murder under this theory hence the perspective of Aunt Maria.
Jessica on the other hand is left in an ethical dilemma in the entire situation…
References
Harmin K., (2012). Utilitarian Vs. Kantian Ethics. https://catchharmin.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/utilitarianism-vs.-kantian-ethics/
Pro-Choice Action Network, (2016). Misconceptions About Abortion. http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/abortioninfo/misconce.shtml
Shakil A., (2016). Kantian Duty Based (Deontological) Ethics. http://sevenpillarsinstitute.org/morality-101/kantian-duty-based-deontological-ethics
"It is not just a Catholic and Protestant Debate"(13). Some Catholic statements, like the 1968 papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, condemn the practice on grounds of the created order, which is thought to be structured in such a way that all sexual expression must be open to procreation. Other statements, notably various declarations issued from 1969 to 1989 by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) in the U.S. appeal instead
The crux of the matter, of course, is that Polish law is incongruent with that throughout Europe as denoted within the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The latter provides access for all citizens throughout the Continent to have "respect for privacy and family life" (Martin). This is a great right, and one that is worthy of being upheld. However, in Poland, abortions are
Abortion and Class Bias Abortion has generally been framed as an issue of gender rights, a question of whether women have the right to privacy and have jurisdiction over their own bodies. This formulation has made abortion into a feminist cause. Any attempts to criminalize or otherwise infringe on abortion rights is viewed as a violation of the rights of individual women. However, there is a side to this argument that often remains
Abortion After Prenatal Testing Methods of Prenatal Diagnosis There are four methods of prenatal diagnosis that is available to women. The first and most commonly known is ultrasonography, colloquially referred to as "ultrasound." A picture of the fetus is developed through the implementation of sound waves. Ultrasound is used to identify abnormalities that are physically apparent such as deformed limbs, defective chest, and heart. During the fourteenth to sixteenth week of the
Conclusion Abortion from a purely moral or ethical perspective can never be endorsed. However, in some medical conditions where the life of the mother is at stake abortion as a life saving intervention is certainly approved. Also in cases where the pregnancy is due to sexual victimization the woman has the right to decide about abortion. Irrespective of the methods used abortion leaves a great psychological stigma and guilt feeling. The more
The pro-life arguments state that a fetus is in fact a real-life person in the making. Is true there's no supporting scientific evidence for the beginning of personhood, but what if an unborn child has a soul and can actually feel pain? Isn't then artificial abortion a crime? Just because we are not sure, we should take the most radical solution that we can and are allowed to by