Locke Or Berkeley Essay

Length: 4 pages Sources: 2 Subject: Black Studies - Philosophy Type: Essay Paper: #10194299 Related Topics: Stark Law, Philosophers, Fire Science, Descartes Meditations
Excerpt from Essay :

Locke v. Berkeley

The philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley offer stark contrasts on the issue of various matters. Locke's whose viewpoint can best be classified as based in relativism. He believed that all knowledge come from the senses. As every man's senses are unique, no two individuals will sense the same experience the same and, therefore, all knowledge is different in each individual. By extension, there is no such thing as better beliefs or true beliefs. Everyone's beliefs are their own and based on their individual experience. George Berkeley's viewpoints offer a sharp contrast to those of Locke. In fact, their individual careers ran concurrently and they spent most of that time being contrasted and possessing viewpoints that were diametrically opposed. Berkeley's was an empiricist but one who also possessed a certain idealist twist. Berkeley viewed experience as the source of most knowledge. According to Berkeley's form of empiricism, objects, regardless of what they are, are only ideas in the minds of those observing them and, as a result, do not exist without being perceived.

Of the two viewpoints, those of Locke seem to have better application. Locke's view that everyone's mind is a blank slate (tabula rasa) at birth and that all knowledge is acquired thereafter through one senses provides a logical explanation for the differences between individuals. As our senses are the source of all knowledge and understanding, it is clearly logical that everyone's sense experiences differ and, therefore, everyone's knowledge is also different. Unlike Berkeley, Locke did not believe that there was anything innate in anyone and that all concepts, ideas, and thoughts were the result of sensory experience. According to Locke, there is no such thing as innate knowledge.

Locke's greatest contribution to the field of philosophy and to generalized knowledge is his development of the idea of relativism. Because he believed that all human knowledge is sensually based there is no thing as perfect knowledge or understanding. Each person's experience is relative and there is no true or perfect knowledge. This is not to say that certain ideas or knowledge are more objectively sound but, unlike the empiricists who would argue that there are absolutes that everyone must obey or believe, Locke would argue that truth and rightness are based upon what has experienced...

...

Psychologists in such field argue strongly that because it is not possible to share the same sense experiences of another individual it is also not possible to understand the nature of their mental state. Although behaviorism does not enjoy the level of popularity that it once did, it continues to be a viable field of psychology and Locke's relativist's views still maintain some application.

Modern science has poked some holes in Locke's arguments. Work in the area of brain physiology and anatomy has established that all humans possess certain abilities that are the same among all individuals and that, therefore, Locke's claim that everyone is born with a blank slate is not accurate. Locke's concept, however, that our senses are the source of most of our knowledge remains viable. More importantly, his view that everyone's experience is different explains how diversity can develop among individuals whose life's sensory experiences are nearly identical. The reality is that no two individual's sensory experience can be classified as being identical and that, therefore, knowledge should have no absolutes.

Locke believes that man is capable of obtaining a great deal of knowledge about the world around him and that there…

Cite this Document:

"Locke Or Berkeley" (2012, February 12) Retrieved August 11, 2022, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/locke-or-berkeley-54199

"Locke Or Berkeley" 12 February 2012. Web.11 August. 2022. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/locke-or-berkeley-54199>

"Locke Or Berkeley", 12 February 2012, Accessed.11 August. 2022,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/locke-or-berkeley-54199

Related Documents
George Berkeley's Principal Metaphysical Position Is Idealism;
Words: 1480 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 9399739

George Berkeley's principal metaphysical position is idealism; nothing including material objects, exists apart from perception; external objects are ultimately collections of ideas and sensations. From his earliest writings in the philosophical commentaries, Berkeley's idealism is evident. Taking into consideration his thoughts as taken from The Empiricists when he contends that his belief is that apples, trees, mountains exist out there, unperceived by any mind. Some may view this as a

Philosophy: Berkeley, Locke and Descartes
Words: 751 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 82378899

Objects had primary qualities of an independent of the observer, like mass, motion, texture, etcetera, as opposed to subjective qualities like color, taste, and smell. As the Matrix world was wholly subjective, it was therefore a false world and one should seek to escape it, as it shut a person out from full participation in a world of external substances, including God, and also the primary qualities of other

Philosophy of Descartes and Its
Words: 4086 Length: 11 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 74645269

5. Kant's "Copernican Revolution" in philosophy is in his genius use of the positive aspects of Rationalism (Descartes and so on) and Empiricism (Locke, Berkeley and Hume). How can you argue this out with the help of the "Critique of Pure Reason"? The human experience of negotiating the universe as it seems to be presented to us is one governed by a great many assumptions. Our education of this process, and

Scandal in Philosophy
Words: 580 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 97306381

Scandal in Philosophy In Soccio's account of Immanuel Kant's philosophy, Immanuel Kant saw as a "Scandal in Philosophy" the basic disjunction between western philosophical schools, such that indicated both sides were in part mistaken about their premises. There are several important mediating figures here, whom we must understand first if we wish to understand Kant's own identification of this problem, his "Scandal in Philosophy," and Kant's means of correcting it.

Education -- Institutional Mission Statement the Mission
Words: 395 Length: 1 Pages Topic: Teaching Paper #: 12358636

Education -- Institutional Mission Statement The mission of this institution comprises three essential goals: (1) to promote educational polices and practices that help every student identify his or her greatest areas of intellectual interests, strengths, and aptitudes; (2) to ensure that every student receives the necessary instruction and support to reach his or her full intellectual and vocational potential; and (3) to enable every student to contribute to the intellectual, social,

Philosophy Questions
Words: 2855 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Philosophy Paper #: 76501104

Empiricism is fundamentally the belief that all knowledge is eventually resultant from the senses and experience, and that all conceptions can be linked back to data from the senses. John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume are considered to be three of the most persuasive empiricists in philosophy. The key aspects that the philosophies of these three empiricists have are that knowledge develops from sensory experience. However, it is imperative