MCJ_610_MODULE Insititution Understanding Social Myths Discussion Chapter

I also agree to the use of media recovery devices to help in recovering the deleted record. The police cannot afford loosing the evidence since it is the most appropriate way of deciding on the case. The police should be in custody of the devices that can help in retrieving deleted media because this act as a way of securing evidences in the public. Sentencing reform

I support the view that there should be improvement in the penal system to ensure that there is relief of the overcrowding problem. The improvement in the penal system involves diversifying on the penalties that an individual undergoes without including prisons as a vital solution. This would involve the states re-evaluating the sentence terms for the low-level crimes. Only the high-risk offenders should be in prisons while the state should go for other methods like house arrest and microchip technology in cases of low-level offenders (Kraska & Bent, 2011). This ensure that there is reduction in the number of prisoners while also cutting down on the government expenses; consequently, providing assurance for efficiency.

Juvenile...

...

This provides the court with enough information to determine the susceptibility of the individual associating to the mental health problems or the substance abuse. Further, the interactive database and the normal court procedures help in determining the magnitude of the crime. This helps in determining whether Juvenile prison should be the appropriate, if high level, or a non-criminal environment, if low level. The diversification will help in reducing the burden of the criminal justice system in remedying the mental health and substance abuse cases (Hancock & Sharp, 2004).
Reference

Kraska, P., & Brent, J. (2011).Theorizing Criminal Justice: Eight Essential Orientations (2nd

Edition). Long Grove, (ISBN: 978-1-57766-663-9)

Hancock, B., & Sharp, P. (2004).Criminal Justice in America (3rd Edition).Upper Saddle River,

NY: Prentice Hall (ISBN: 978-0-13098-411-1)

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Kraska, P., & Brent, J. (2011).Theorizing Criminal Justice: Eight Essential Orientations (2nd

Edition). Long Grove, (ISBN: 978-1-57766-663-9)

Hancock, B., & Sharp, P. (2004).Criminal Justice in America (3rd Edition).Upper Saddle River,

NY: Prentice Hall (ISBN: 978-0-13098-411-1)


Cite this Document:

"MCJ_610_MODULE Insititution Understanding Social Myths" (2013, March 02) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mcj-610-module-insititution-understanding-86380

"MCJ_610_MODULE Insititution Understanding Social Myths" 02 March 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mcj-610-module-insititution-understanding-86380>

"MCJ_610_MODULE Insititution Understanding Social Myths", 02 March 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mcj-610-module-insititution-understanding-86380

Related Documents

" (Potter, 1999) Supreme Court finally strikes down juvenile executions On Mar. 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down once and for all juvenile executions in the United States, abandoning nations such as Nigeria, Congo, China, Pakistan and others whose records of human rights abuse are staggering. The 5-4 decision reverses the death sentences of about 70 juvenile murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future crimes. The executions, the

An interesting and similar development in juvenile justice is the issue of life imprisonment as a cruel and unusual sentence for juvenile offenders. This issue is addressed by Mark Sherman (2009). Sherman states that Joe Sullivan was 13 years old when he attacked and raped an elderly woman. The court judged him as incorrigible and therefore sentenced him to life without parole. Another example is that of Terrance Graham, who

Death Penalty for Juvenile Offenders Supreme Court by a majority decision on March 1, 2005 in Roper v. Simmons held that death penalty for juveniles was "cruel and unusual" and as such the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution forbid the execution of offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed. The action reversed the death sentences of 72 convicted murderers in the U.S.

death penalty and minors - recent Supreme Court finding Death Penalty was extensively applied in the olden times across the world. The modern crusade for banning of capital punishment started in the 18th century with the writings of Montesquieu and also Voltaire. Some of the nations which took a lead in abolishing capital punishment are Venezuela in 1863, San Marino in 1865 and Costa Rica in 1877. Presently, more than

Death Penalty This informative speech outline topic DOES THE DEATH PENALTY DETER CRIME? The outline detailed 4 APA references. It follow format detailed referenced. Please outline tornadoes OUTLINE FOR INFORMATIVE SPEECH Tornadoes Purpose: To inform audience tornadoes Thesis: Today I discuss fascinating facts tornadoes. To inform the audience about the two sides of the debate on the death penalty, regarding its justice and its deterrent effect. The death penalty is one of the

Death Penalty Evolution of the Death Penalty in Supreme Court Jurisprudence Capital punishment has been in existence for centuries. As early back as the Eighteenth Century B.C., the use of the death penalty was found in the Code of King Hammurabi (Death Penalty Information Center [DPIC], 2010). The utilization of the death penalty for designated crimes continued through the years and became incorporated in Britain's penal system (DPIC, 2010). Britain's use of