Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Thus, the strong motivation of the Indians after the war began was to reconsider the borders the white people had imposed on them during the century (Abel, 1992, 2).
A similarity between the presences of the two sides in the two distinctive conflicts was the fact that in the end they were both used by the main actors of the confrontation in the wider game of victory. Thus, the slaves were used as part of the actual military against the British and the Loyalists, while different Indian tribes were used by one side or another in their own struggle for victory. Due to the confusion of the time, many slaves enrolled in the armies of the Loyalists, believing that they would indeed gave their freedom. However, as the Loyalists lost the war, the slaves that were not given back to their owners were shipped as merchandise in Jamaica, or even Britain.
Another important issue to be taken into account is the personal motivations of the two parts in their respective fights. Thus, the blacks wanted their freedom from a social system, racism, while Indians desired their freedom from the politically established boarders that delimited their territory and determined their removal from the ancient places of their tribes.
Finally, the issue of the eventual outcomes that the participation of the African-Americans in the Revolutionary war and the Indians in the Civil War had is relevant for the direction their faiths would ultimately take. In this sense, the African-Americans suffered immensely from their participation in the war (Africans in
...
The Indians' fate after the end of the Civil War was worse than before. Given the fact that there was no unanimous decision of supporting one side or another, and more precisely, the decision to enter the war came as a natural and inevitable consequence of the war already underway, the Indian tribes were the victims of the clashing parties (Grinde, 1984). The regime of the reservation worsened and the pressures for relocation increased.
Therefore, it can be pointed out that the involvement of minority groups in wars that would determine the fate of the nation had negative effects on their historical condition.
References
Abel, a.H. (1992) the American Indian in the Civil War, 1862-1865. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Africans in America. (n.d.) Revolution. The Revolutionary War. Retrieved 14 March 2008 at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2narr4.html
Grinde, D.A. Jr. (1984) "Red vs. Black: Conflict and Accommodation in the Post Civil War Indian Territory, 1865-1907." American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 211-229.
Jenkins, P. (1997). A history of the United States. New York: Palgrave
Mexican-American War FAR-REACHING IMPACT The purpose of this paper is to trace and establish the political effects of the Mexican-American War, fought between the two countries from 1846 to 1848. Also called the U.S.-Mexico War, it is known in the U.S. As plainly the Mexican War. In Mexico, as the North American Invasion of Mexico, the United States War against Mexico, and the War of Northern Aggression. This paper summarizes the background,
Perhaps because he was writing in the wake of the Vietnam Era, Schroeder is highly conscious of the 'dammed if you do, damned if you don't' position anti-war politicians often find themselves, when it comes to morally and financially supporting the troops abroad. As was often the case since, most Congressmen, agreed to send aid, even if they opposed the war. But even if congress voted to apportion funds, and
The Civil War was one of the most defining events in the nation’s history, and at the time was the most important event since the American Revolution. Whereas the Revolution embodied the ideals, values, and principles of the new nation, setting it apart from the British Crown and forever altering the geopolitical landscape, the Civil War revealed the persistent hypocrisy that continues to plague American society. Unresolved conflicts left brewing
S. democracy. In 1998, the Center for the Study of Latino Health and Culture at UCLA convened several middle-aged Latinos to discuss the Latino society in California while they were growing up. Born in the 1940s and 1950s, they remembered a much more segregated and exclusionary society than the one today, and the hurt remains: They described growing up in a situation in which being Latino was simply not validated.
Mexican-American War (1846-1848) The Great Territorial Loss From the perspective of the United States, the Mexican-American War, together with the Louisiana Purchase, represented important land acquisitions as part of the country's relentless expansion westward. In this regard, Kurth (1999) reports that, "There were grand achievements in this national project of continental expansion, especially the southwestern annexations, which were achieved through U.S. military victory in the Mexican-American War. In this case, the United
The war and the years that preceded it led to the creation of social classes in our country. These classes consisted of the rich upper-class down to the poor immigrants; and each class had its own rules and regulations by which it lived. To this day, a large part of our society is based on classes. Socially, the war divided races and started what would lead to racism, bigotry, and