Rolfe's Reflective Cycle Applied To Research Essay

Researcher Development

1.0 Introduction

The aim of any professional is to develop skills as a researcher and use reflective models and frameworks to identify ones development needs. The purpose of developing as a researcher is to be able to understand what is needed for success based upon a detailed personal development plan with a considered rationale (Becker et al. 2012). Some might wonder why a personal development plan is important. The answer is that writing a personal development plan as a researcher is an important exercise because it helps one to clarify the steps necessary to achieve your research goals, keeps one motivated through small, achievable milestones, and sets expectations for oneself in terms of output and quality. Additionally, such a plan serves as a benchmark against which progress can be measured (Becker et al. 2012). Developing this document should not be seen as a one-off exercise; it should be revisited periodically to measure progress and adjust targets accordingly. Furthermore, self-reflection throughout the research process can help identify areas that need improvement, e.g., time management or communication skills (Wisker 2017). Constructing a personal development plan is thus essential for any researcher who wants to have an efficient trajectory in their academic career.

For this plan, four reflective frameworks have been identified which will be used to help in this process: 1. Gibbs Reflective Cycle, 2. Schn's Framework, 3. Rolfe et al's Framework, and 4. Jasper's ERA Model.

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle will be used to break down each experience into its individual stages, allowing for identification of areas requiring further development and planning of development needs accordingly. Schn's Framework will be used to focus on reflection in action, requiring practice to embed this way of thinking into daily activities to enable quick adaptation to any changing situations. Rolfe et al's Framework will provide a clear three-stage focus, driving an action-oriented approach with the questions of 'what?', 'so what' and 'now what'. Finally, Jasper's ERA Model will structure the development plan into three stages: experience, reflection, and action, giving a clear structure to follow when developing the personal development plan.

Using these reflective models and frameworks, a personal development plan has been created to address development needs. This plan includes improving research skills by attending workshops and webinars, developing knowledge of the research process by reading books and articles, enhancing data analysis skills by taking an online course, and strengthening communication skills by practicing public speaking. These activities will help to develop skills as a researcher and progress in a career. It is concluded that a range of reflective models and frameworks have been used to identify development needs and create a personal development plan which will help to develop skills and progress in a career as a researcher.

1.1 What is Gibbs Reflective Cycle?

The Gibbs Reflective Cycle is a model of structured reflection developed by Professor Graham Gibbs in 1988. It is a tool often used by professionals to reflect on experiences and analyze their responses to them. The cycle is composed of six stages: description, feelings, evaluation, analysis, conclusion, and action plan (Markkanen et al. 2020). This cycle encourages individuals to think deeply about an experience, consider how they were affected by it, and how they can use what they have learnt to inform future decisions (Sekarwinahyu et al. 2019). Through this approach, researchers are able to identify problematic areas that need improvement. Engaging in thoughtful analysis of successes and failures enables individuals to identify effective strategies for future endeavors (Husebo et al. 2015). Collectively, the steps help guide an effective transformation into an even better researcher.

1.2 What is Schns Framework?

Schn's Framework, developed by Donald Schn, is a model of reflective practice that has been widely used in the fields of education, business, and healthcare. It is based on the idea that professionals should be actively engaging in reflecting on their own practice and the contexts in which they work in order to improve their practice and better serve their clients (Pitsoe and Maila 2013). The framework consists of three main components: reflection-in-action, reflection-in-context, and reflection-on-action. Reflection-in-action is the process of reflecting on ones practice as it is occurring in order to adjust and improve it. Reflection-in-context is the process...…where they could have improved.

Their Stage Two Reflection Goals are: 1) Utilizing the Gibbs, Schn and Rolfe models to reflect on their experiences and identify areas for improvement. 2) Gathering feedback from colleagues and mentors to gain a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses. 3) Developing a clear understanding of the research process and the key elements that go into successful research.

Their Stage Three Action Goals are: 1) Developing a tailored study plan to address their weaknesses in research and enrolling in online courses or attending workshops to gain a better understanding of research methods. 2) Connecting with other researchers to gain insight into the research process. 3) Reading research papers and articles to develop an understanding of the current trends in research. 4) Setting up a plan to monitor their progress and measure their learning. 5) Taking part in research projects or internships to gain practical experience. 6) Utilizing the latest research tools and technologies to improve their research skills.

4.0 Overall View

Overall, this plan consists of three main components: learning, practice and application. Firstly, one will focus on learning new concepts within my field, such as best practices and emerging research topics. Secondly, one will take time to practice revisiting previously learned material and hone my craft. Lastly, one will look for opportunities to apply this knowledge through projects and collaborations with other researchers or with industry partners.

In addition to this plan of study, a researcher should also intend to attend conferences related to the area of expertise in order to be able to network with peers and draw inspiration from their work as well as gain valuable insight into current trends and topics within the field. Finally, one should like to use online resources such as webinars and e-learning platforms in order to broaden my horizons even further and expand knowledge beyond traditional classroom learning structures.

By taking these steps in a thoughtful way alongside careful consideration of the rationale behind the proposed actions alongside this personal development plan, the researcher should believe that it is possible to widen the scope of research expertise as well as sharpening more specific…

Sources Used in Documents:

References:


Becker, S., Bryman, A. and Ferguson, H. eds., 2012. Understanding research for social policy and social work: themes, methods and approaches. Policy Press.


Burton, K., 2012. A study of motivation: How to get your employees moving. Management, 3(2), pp.232-234.


Cottrell, S., 2019. The study skills handbook. Bloomsbury Publishing.


Muenchen, R.A., 2012. The popularity of data analysis software. URL http://r4stats.com/popularity.


Cite this Document:

"Rolfe's Reflective Cycle Applied To Research" (2022, December 15) Retrieved April 29, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rolfe-reflective-cycle-applied-research-essay-2177998

"Rolfe's Reflective Cycle Applied To Research" 15 December 2022. Web.29 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rolfe-reflective-cycle-applied-research-essay-2177998>

"Rolfe's Reflective Cycle Applied To Research", 15 December 2022, Accessed.29 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rolfe-reflective-cycle-applied-research-essay-2177998

Related Documents

Research Grant National Institutes of Health Research Grant This essay examines the application process for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grant through the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), Funding Opportunity Title Genomic Resource Grants for Community Resource Projects (U41), Funding Opportunity Announcement Number PAR-11-095. The NHGRI was established originally as the National Center for Human Genome research in 1989 and led the NIH's contribution to the Human Genome Project. This

Research Participants • Legal and ethical issues relevant to nursing research Any kind of breach done with regards to the legal aspects has the likelihood of becoming an issue for litigation. The usual legal concerns associated with nursing research can be split into three: Ownership of Data: This can be a legal issue for nursing research that is the topic of a contract and can also come about as a result of rivaling research

Research Database Matrix National Institute of Health's Intramural Database Resources Location: http://intramural.nih.gov/index.tml Description: The stated objective of the NIH Intramural Database is to collect and disseminate data gathered from research projects conducted by the Intramural programs of the Institutes and Centers of the National Institutes of Health. This includes studies commissioned by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and dozens of other national health research institutes. The

Research Ethics The little Albert experiment The little Albert experiment is a famous psychology experiment that was conducted by a behaviorist John. B. Watson. The participant in the experiment was a nine-month-old boy and he was exposed to various stimuli that included a white rat, monkey, masks and burning news papers and the reactions of the boy were observed. Initially no fear was expressed by the boy at any objects shown to

Research Ethics It is important when conducting research that the researcher adheres to a strong set of ethical guidelines. Ethics ensure that the research is conducted without causing harm to any person. While modern research ethics began with the study of issues regarding the use of human subjects, it has evolved into a more comprehensive understanding of a wide range of norms of conduct (Resnik, 2010). Some of the different subject

Werhane & Doering (1997) point out that it is virtually impossible to operate in a totally objective research environment. All researchers have a degree of bias. The goal is to minimize that bias as a variable in empirical research. Focusing on conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment, Werhane & Doering (1997) raise important issues and address critical concerns. The issues of conflict of interest and conflict of commitment are