Universal Health Care: An Opinion Research Proposal

" And we see - especially as a result of the internet - many businesses eliminating the middle man today. It is working, and people are saving money on items that were once marked up for the manufacturer's profit, and then marked up again for the middle man's profit. If we eliminate the middle man, then we eliminate waste. and, if we go by the current profit margins of the insurance companies, we will save hundreds of millions dollars - perhaps even billions of dollars a year and the government could then well afford to subsidize the physicians and healthcare providers as opposed to the insurance companies - which is what the plans proposed by President Elect Barak Obama does, as did Senator Hillary Clinton's, and as did Senator John McCain's plan do. When we take out the middle man who is incentivized against allowing access to healthcare, we take the worry out of healthcare on all fronts. A healthcare system without the insurance companies is a win-win situation for the government, and the medical service providers. People will, once again, be able to choose their own healthcare providers, and there will be an incentive for hospitals to deal with the increasingly rising rates of staph infection, and other conditions that make going to them for care worrisome.

We might see health insurance companies go out of business, but those jobs will be absorbed by a hospital and medical practice industry that will begin to rebuild itself. Managed care is like a landlord that never makes repairs to its rental units. Right now, we have dilapidated and slum housing, and managed care is the slum landlord who keeps raising rents without making improvements.

Managed care, in theory, is contrary to what is the American dream and perspective. Managed...

...

Managed care does not take into account the quality of life that keeps a person's very life on earth a meaningful experience and passing. We need to put the emphasis back on the meaning of quality of life, and this can only be done by putting the authority over the delivery of healthcare into the hands of the experts - the physicians, nurses, and community of service providers that have all been devastated by the current healthcare system.
This does not mean that the public should not contribute to the cost of their health care. A spending account should be set up for people that allows them reasonable access to healthcare, or at least the kind of healthcare that is going to best serve them on the basis of their care with their primary physician. If care is going to be denied, or if a spending account has been exhausted, there must be offsets to those circumstances.

We are not going to resolve the healthcare access problem in four pages. However, there is no end to the usefulness that ideas submitted for discussion and consideration can bring to the discussion table. Health care reform is a daunting task, but it is one that can be accomplished, and in an affordable way. We have to return health care choices to the public and to the physicians and healthcare providers.

Many people say that managed care came into existence because of an out of control and increasingly high cost to health insurers. The only difference between now, and then, when managed care came into existence, is who is getting the health care dollars - and the fact that people are sicker, without coverage, and without access to care.

Cite this Document:

"Universal Health Care An Opinion" (2008, December 09) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/universal-health-care-an-opinion-25976

"Universal Health Care An Opinion" 09 December 2008. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/universal-health-care-an-opinion-25976>

"Universal Health Care An Opinion", 09 December 2008, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/universal-health-care-an-opinion-25976

Related Documents

Universal Health Care - Literature Review Universal Health Care Universal health care is a hot-button topic for many people, especially since "Obamacare" was passed into law. However, there has been some discussion of a health care bill of some kind for the United States for many years before President Obama took office. The debate is nothing new, but there are two sides to the issue - both of which are very significant

Some believe that a universal healthcare system would provide fewer incentives for doctors, who would be less likely to perform at their best. Doctors who are not paid based on their quality may be more likely to perform at a lower quality, some hypothesize. This argument is also used to support the fact that having national health insurance may dissuade those who would be good doctors from going into

This is not the way it should be; people should not have to choose between what is best for themselves and what is best for the people they love because an insurance company is standing in the way of their lives. People have the right to health care and the right to be the healthiest that they can be, whether that health is given through medical visits or through

(Universal Healthcare: The Debate Rages On, 2009) The solution must be one that is more than just an effort to attempt to imitate the system of Europe but instead must be, as cited in this specific report, one that "...undergoes a radical change - beginning with the medical schools..." (Universal Healthcare: The Debate Rages On, 2009) Indeed, it appears that a fundamental change is the only method of change that

IntroductionSaying that COVID-19 has been devastating to nations and their citizens seems to be an understatement. The impact that the virus has had on the wellbeing, livelihoods, as well as lives of people not only in the U.S. but across the world is massive. More than 6 million people have so far lost their lives to COVID-19 across the world. In the United States alone, the death toll from the

In Favor of Single Payer Health Care The American health care system is broken. On this much, almost everybody can agree. Costs are spiralling out of control, health outcomes are among the worst of all developed countries, and nobody can agree on what will make it better. One of the reasons for this disagreement is that different stakeholders fail to agree on what the purpose of the health care system should