Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Debate on Human Space Exploration on Mars
In the 21st century, life on earth became increasingly inhospitable: nuclear war between great powers had decimated the globe. Technology had advanced to the point where space exploration on Mars had become possible. The only question now was whether mankind should make that leap and take its adventures to a new planet. Mankind might be ready for space exploration on Mars, but was the universe ready for mankind?
The question of whether or not to colonize Mars had been a topic of debate for many years. Some scientists believed that it was our moral responsibility to explore and colonize other planets, while others believed that it was both too risky and too expensive. Still, some others, arguing from an ethical point of view, said that mankind was replete with all sorts of moral problems and that to permit him to colonize a new planet would be like permitting a virus to settle in and colonize a new host. Considering what mankind had done to planet Earth through nuclear war, it stood to reason in these moralists eyes that mankind should not be allowed to do the same to another planet. The problems of mankind had not been fixed; the hubris and tendency to inflict harm had not be removed from mankinds nature. Humankind was a conflicted, conscious entity that had the ability to do good or evil at any given moment (Asbhy, 2021). Considering that people were...…to adopt. Should it be allowed to be sent to Mars? Congress must act now in order to prevent another possible tragedy from taking place elsewhere in the universe under mans hand.
One debater has argued that unless or new generation of leaders and astronauts can embrace a system of virtue ethics, there is no point exploring spaceperiod. Virtue ethics is a branch of moral philosophy that emphasizes the role of character and virtue in ethical decision making (Van Zyl, 2018). Proponents of virtue ethics argue that the development of good character traits is essential for leading a morally upright life. Unlike other ethical theories, which focus on rules or consequences, virtue ethics focuses on the kind of person that someone is. As such, it has been…
References
Ashby, M. A. (2021). The Shifts in Human Consciousness. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-4.
Fischer, J. M. (2020). What's with Free Will?: Ethics and Religion After Neuroscience. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Tilley, J. J. (2022). Does Psychological Egoism Entail Ethical Egoism?. The Review of Metaphysics, 76(1), 115-133.
Virtue Ethics: The Good and the Bad About Virtue Ethics The philosophy of virtue ethics holds that being a 'good person' or what one might call 'character' is the most important determinant of moral action. Virtue ethics is considered to be one of the major philosophical orientations in the field of normative ethics, along with consequentialism and deontology (Hursthouse 2010). Many consider it to be the oldest form of ethics, harkening
Virtue Ethics Virtue-based vs. duty-based ethics: arguments and examples from Victor Hugo, Aristotle, Bernard Mayo, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and William Frankena In the study of ethics and morality, there have been theoretical foundations in which it was argued that morality comes with being rather than doing, or that a true moral life is one that is a product of doing instead of being. Or, oftentimes, theoreticians and philosophers contend that morality must bear
Virtue Ethics and reasoning for the scenario Virtue ethics is the ethical strategy preferred. Efficient leaders and true professionals strive at achieving moral excellence which encompasses integrity, justice, valor and good sense. In the present day, virtue ethics constitutes one among the three key normative ethics strategies. Primarily, it can be considered a strategy which stresses moral fiber or virtues, contrary to consequentialism (which focuses on the consequences one’s actions have)
This will allow someone to move beyond the different emotions, so that they can be able to see how the different actions will affect the world around them. Despite some of the obvious weaknesses, you can be able to determine the most appropriate course of action, by asking questions and gaining more information. Once this achieved, you will have a greater sense of enlightenment, because you were able to
The question here arises, why did we have to return to ancient philosophy of virtue ethics? But interestingly while a great deal of credit is given to Aristotle and Plato, the modern moral philosophers such as Anscombe, Foot, Murdoch, Slote had mentioned in very precise terms the problems they found in Aristotelian ethics. They must have absorbed the writings of ancient philosophers since a lot is said about the moral
Deontological ethics are based on other theories that focus on duty and obligation. Immanuel Kant (1785) argued that an individual should "always act in such a way that you can also will that the maxim of your action become universal law" (p. v). It can be argued that Kant's arguments are echoed in a quote often attributed to Ghandi, "Be the change you want to see in the world"