Leadership and Management Development: Theoretical Perspectives

Introduction

The development of leaders and managers is important for organizational outcomes. This paper addresses the topic of leadership and management development from a theoretical perspective. The theoretical background delineating the need for leadership training in organizations goes all the way back to the start of the 20th century, when leadership studies began to grow in earnest. Following Great Man Theory—which held that leaders were born rather than made—researchers began to identify traits that leaders shared. From there, they examined the idea that effective leadership can differ depending on the environment in which it is needed, and they explored styles of leadership and skills, such as emotional and social intelligence, that can support leadership and management success.

Because leadership is something that can be learned and that does support organizational outcomes, it stands to reason that leadership training should be an important focus for organizations. The objectives of this paper are to define management and leadership, outline the leadership and development process, and survey the leadership theories that contribute to organizational development. In summary, the paper shows that while leadership focuses on vision, relationships, and motivation, management focuses on logistics. Leadership theories therefore tend to highlight the need for vision, supportive relationships, and change—especially in contemporary environments.

The paper proceeds with the following structure: first, it examines the theoretical aspects of leadership and management development by discussing the difference between management and leadership; second, it examines the leadership and management development process, its importance, and how it can be made effective; third, it discusses the leadership theories that contribute to organizational development, including contemporary theories and industry examples.

Difference Between Management and Leadership

The difference between management and leadership is that managers focus on the day-to-day logistics of operations—organizing personnel, planning processes, directing operations, and controlling for outcomes—whereas leaders focus on building relationships, communicating a vision to obtain buy-in from followers, supporting personnel with innovative and creative opportunities, and building teams that can collaborate to accomplish the objectives of the organization (Zeng, 2019). There can be a great deal of overlap between leadership and management, as some managers will possess strong leadership skills and some leaders will possess strong management skills. But in general, the two roles focus on very different agendas. Leaders are commonly associated with vision and motivation; managers are commonly associated with logistics and organization. Nonetheless, both are needed for an organization to succeed in its endeavors.

The Leadership and Management Development (LMD) Process

The leadership and management development process should focus on identifying workers with high self-esteem who have cultural intelligence, social and emotional intelligence, strong communication skills, and a commitment to the service of others (Liu et al., 2019). This focus should also be supportive of the aims of the organization (McCauley & Palus, 2021). The LMD process is meant to facilitate the future governance and management of the organization by grooming workers from within for leadership and management roles. The process includes aligning values, program content, measurements, structure, and mentoring so that the qualities and skills needed for leadership and management can be grown, fostered, and maintained. Variables to be considered in this process include the characteristics of the individual learner, the quality of the LMD program, and support for change. Experiential learning, goal-setting, visioning, and the promotion of self-efficacy are all aspects of the process.

The importance of LMD is found in the fact that it supports performance and commitment to the organization by focusing on building competencies, improving outcomes, and elevating standards (Till, McKimm, & Swanwick, 2020). As Lees and Armit (2021) point out, the LMD process makes it possible for personnel to benefit personally and professionally, helps teams develop and perform more effectively, and supports the improvement of organizational outcomes. It is effectively a way to ensure that the organization promotes leaders and managers from within who are familiar with the organization's values, have demonstrated commitment to it, represent its ethics, and have the capacity to perform well in leadership or management roles. The LMD process is essentially a means of ensuring the health and performance of the organization for years to come. The practical knowledge and skills taught through the LMD process contribute to the positive growth of the organization (Prommer, Tiberius, & Kraus, 2020).

The LMD process can be effective with the right program—one that focuses on the individual personality, traits, characteristics, skills, and goals of the personnel under consideration for development. Leadership approach, competencies, and self-actualization all factor into the process's effectiveness. An individual who has not attained a degree of self-actualization will not be a good fit for an LMD candidate position. However, managers and leaders can take steps to support the development of self-actualization among workers by promoting a culture that gives them the support they need to build self-esteem, a sense of pride in their work, and a sense of purpose in what they do.

By creating an environment of praise, safety, and meaningful activity, leaders and managers can implicitly prepare the ground for all followers to become candidates for the LMD process. Those who are interested in rising through the ranks of the organization will have the opportunity to do so. The LMD process provides them with the chance to hone their leadership and management skills through experiential learning (Prommer et al., 2020).

Key Leadership Theories and Organizational Development

Leadership theories have evolved over the centuries, from Great Man Theory to Trait Theory, Contingency Theory, Transformational Leadership Theory, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, Adaptive Leadership Theory, and Self-Leadership Theory (Uslu, 2019). As Uslu (2019) notes, these leadership theories are rooted in the cultural values—such as individualism—of the West, and they contribute to organizational development insofar as individualism is promoted as a value. One key feature shared by all leadership theories is that they support organizational aims (Adnan & Valliappan, 2019). Some do this by communicating a shared vision of what the organization should be, as Transformational Leadership Theory does. Others do this by sharing leadership, identifying the needs of the environment and adjusting one's leadership style accordingly, or viewing the leader as an ethical exemplar whose actions followers are expected to mirror. In each case, organizational development is supported by leadership theories that emphasize accountability, responsibility, vision, supportiveness, fairness, morality, and commitment to the organizational vision.

Conclusion

The objective of this paper was to explain the various leadership theories that influence organizational development today by discussing the difference between leadership and management and how the LMD process works to benefit organizations. It then discussed leadership theories, and identified which contemporary leadership theories are most commonly used in industries today, supplying examples for each. For an effective LMD approach, organizations should focus on cultivating the skills needed for transformational leadership, innovative leadership, and servant leadership. The lessons drawn from this paper are that leaders serve others best when they empower them—by sharing knowledge, helping them develop skills, and providing them with the space to grow through experiential learning.

References

Adnan, S.N.S.M. and Valliappan, R., 2019. Communicating shared vision and leadership styles towards enhancing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

Cherry, K. (2021). Leadership styles and frameworks you should know. Retrieved from

Gayathri, S. and Kumari, D.A., 2019. Electric vehicles—An introduction of the Tesla for strategy and leadership. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8.

Gharakhani, D. and Zaferanchi, A., 2019. The effect of job burnout on turnover intention with regard to the mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Health, 10(1), pp. 109–117.

Lees, P. and Armit, K., 2021. Promoting and learning from leadership research: 10 years on. BMJ Leader, pp. leader-2021.

Liu, Z., Riggio, R.E., Day, D.V., Zheng, C., Dai, S. and Bian, Y., 2019. Leader development begins at home: Overparenting harms adolescent leader emergence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), p. 1226.

McCauley, C.D. and Palus, C.J., 2021. Developing the theory and practice of leadership development: A relational view. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), p. 101456.

Nobles, B., 2019. Use hierarchy for "liberating servant leadership" instead of controlling employees. Journal of Organization Design, 8(1), pp. 1–7.

Prommer, L., Tiberius, V. and Kraus, S., 2020. Exploring the future of startup leadership development. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, p. e00200.

Rao, M.S., 2022. Innovative leadership: Tools and techniques to acquire innovative and inspiring ideas. In Innovative Leadership in Times of Compelling Changes (pp. 69–78). Springer, Cham.

Siangchokyoo, N., Klinger, R.L. and Campion, E.D., 2020. Follower transformation as the linchpin of transformational leadership theory: A systematic review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), p. 101341.

Till, A., McKimm, J. and Swanwick, T., 2020. The importance of leadership development in medical curricula: A UK perspective (stars are aligning). Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 12, p. 19.

Uslu, O., 2019. A general overview to leadership theories from a critical perspective. (1), pp. 161–172.

Uzarski, D. and Broome, M.E., 2019. A leadership framework for implementation of an organization's strategic plan. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(1), pp. 12–17.

Zeng, Z., 2019. Different functions between leadership and management in today's enterprises. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 1(3).