Humor In Three Films Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1394
Cite
Related Topics:

Humor in 3 Films Comedy has often provided the perfect vehicle for social and political commentary. Three films that use comedy to as the basis for social and political commentary are Duck Soup (1933), The Great Dictator (1940), and Some Like It Hot (1959). Duck Soup, The Great Dictator, and Some Like It Hot provide commentary on social and political issues, as well as on issues of sex and gender.

Duck Soup is a Marx Brothers classic directed by Leo McCarey in which Groucho Marx plays Rufus T. Firefly, a man who is appointed to the position of Freedonia, a small country that has recently gone bankrupt (Duck Soup). Firefly's appointment as leader is made as part of an agreement between undisclosed members of the country in exchange for continued financial support from Mrs. Gloria Teasdale, a wealthy widow. At the same time, Freedonia's neighbor, Sylvania, is plotting to take over the bankrupt country with the constant threat of war looming over Freedonia. Duck Soup is presented as slapstick with everything in the film being highly exaggerated. In the film, the Marx brothers attempt to demonstrate the issues that contribute to political unrest, the extremes people will go to so as to provoke another into war, and the consequences thereof. For reasons unknown, Sylvania is trying to find a way to take over Freedonia. While no motive is given for Sylvania's interest in its neighbor, it is implied that so long as Mrs. Teasdale is funding Freedonia, Sylvania cannot take the country by military force. By wooing Mrs. Teasdale, McCarey helps to demonstrate how sex can be used to influence politics. Furthermore, in the film, Sylvanian Ambassador Trentino shows that he will go to any lengths to attempt to find an excuse to attack Freedonia by sending spies to spy on Firefly, a tactic that ultimately backfires as Chicolini and Pinky, two spies sent by Trentino, are shown fighting on Freedonia's side at the end of the film.

It is difficult to pinpoint the exact political message McCarey and the Marx brothers were trying to convey...

...

Moreover, there are no explanations given as to why Sylvania is looking for a reason to attack Freedonia; it clearly does not have anything of value because it has gone into bankruptcy. Additionally, it is difficult to ascertain exactly what Freedonia and Sylvania are representative of. While it may argued that Firefly's appointment as leader of Freedonia parallels Adolf Hitler's appointment as chancellor of Germany in 1933, there are not enough parallels in the film to further support this contention (Polsson).
On the other hand, Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator provides a clearer political statement on Hitler and the political and social upheaval in Germany during World War II. Chaplin's film, unlike McCarey's and the Marx brothers', provides a clear, cohesive, and politically charged narrative that explores issues of political and social unrest between World War I and World War II. The Great Dictator begins with Chaplin, reprising the persona of "The Tramp" one last time, as a Jewish barber who was the triggerman in Tomania's artillery who had developed amnesia as a result of a plane crash while attempting to escape the film's equivalent of Allied forces (The Great Dictator). In a way, the barber's amnesia and confusion after returning to his home can parallels global uncertainty and unawareness of how intense and how deep political turmoil and unrest ran in Germany. Chaplin also assumes the role of Adenoid Hynkel, Tomania's dictator. Although the film's opening scene features an intertitle card stating, "Note, any resemblance between Hynkel the Dictator and the Jewish Barber is purely coincidental," there is no arguing that Hynkel is intended to be a satirical interpretation and parody of Hitler. One of the most impressive scenes in the film is Hynkel's dance with the globe. Unlike the Marx brothers' musical number in Duck Soup, which is absurd and does not really serve to advance the plot, Chaplin's dance is a visual metaphor for Hynkel/Hitler's ambitions. He views the world as something that can be played with and possibly conquered.…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Duck Soup. Directed by Leo McCarey. United States: Paramount Pictures, 1933. Netflix Instant

Streaming. Web. 1 March 2013.

The Great Dictator. Directed by Charles Chaplin. United States: United Artists, 1940. DVD.

Polsson, Ken. "Chronology of World History." 14 February 2013. Web. 1 March 2013.


Cite this Document:

"Humor In Three Films" (2013, March 02) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/humor-in-three-films-103486

"Humor In Three Films" 02 March 2013. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/humor-in-three-films-103486>

"Humor In Three Films", 02 March 2013, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/humor-in-three-films-103486

Related Documents
Humor and Violence in U.S.
PAGES 4 WORDS 1160

..There is reason for concern, therefore, when aggressive acts are presented in a humorous context in the media" (622). Although it is intended to refer to society and its misdemeanor, satire cannot be considered to be offensive, since there is a small probability that it will produce any resentment in people. A good example of the American society giving birth to something that is funny and enjoyable, despite its satirical character,

For example, the popular sitcoms Good Times and Sanford and Son showed working class neighborhoods and the problems of violence, crime, and social oppression, and yet how humor always finds its way into these character's lives. The 1970s also brought about a new late night live comedy show, called Saturday Night Live. This show had its first run from 1975 to 1980, and made political humor the centerpiece of Saturday

The Lord will lead one to safety always. One can simply believe in something higher to get the meaning of this; it doesn't have to be Jesus. Psalm 127, contrarily is confusing because it states that unless the Lord builds the house, it is built in vain. This seems to be more literal, but I do get the idea. Unless the people building the house are doing it with

Formalism The subject of films is a matter of dreams for many persons though the attraction has come down after the new medium of video has come in. Yet, for some it is still the medium to dream in. To get into the concept of formalist film theory, one has to talk about the film in terms of the formal or technical elements within the film. These are in terms of its

film noir movement by examining two films from the genre made at two different times within the movement. This will first mean looking at definitions of what classifies a film as noir and then looking at conventions of the movement such as: story, character and setting. This will explore how production value expresses the story and acts as an important filmic tool. The first movie to be discussed is

American frontier in a comparative analysis using two books (Luis Alberto Urrea, In Search of Snow, 1994; Sam Shepard, True West, 1981) and a film, No Country for Old Men, Directed by Ethan and Joel Coen, 2007. These books will be presented in a comparative analysis with the film. The analyses used in this paper will focus on values, setting, conflicts and the way of life presented in each. How