It has been two months since they have introduced H.R. 2009, the Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act. During this time, people have been watching seen a growing amount of support from people living all over the nation for this common proposal seen as just common sense by many. Thanks to that drive, it has been proclaimed that the House of Representatives will have a vote on the Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act before deferring for the August Region Work Period. In this essay, it touches on how this simple, two-page bill barricades the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from imposing or applying President Obama's health care law. This essay makes the point of how in its directing, abuse and of American citizens, the IRS surrendered its right to neutrality. This agency should not be involved in the private, personal choices of Americans as it narrates to their health care.
KEEP THE IRS OFF YOUR HEALTH CARE ACT OF 2013-3
Keep the IRS Off your Health Care Act of 2013 - [H.R.2009]
The Department of the Treasury would be forbidden from executing or imposing any provisions of the Affordable Care Act, under H.R. 2009. Conversely, the bill would not prohibit implementation and application of the act's provisions by other federal agencies. An example would be the advance payment of premium assistance tax credits which had been provided by means of health insurance exchange. With that said, this essay will give an analysis of the proposal and its effect on people.
What is Keep the IRS Off your Health Care Act of 2013?
Not too long ago, Congressman Tom Price, M.D (R-GA) gave a statement that had a lot to do with introducing the Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act of 2013 (Kibble, 2012) -- legislation that would stop the Internal Revenue Service from being able to implementing or force these various types of provisions of the president's health care law.
"Not more than a week ago the American people learned what many had already suspected that the IRS had inappropriately abused its authority to target and intimidate certain individuals and organizations trying to practice their right to free speech, When it comes to an individual's personal health care decisions, no American should be required to answer to the IRS." (King votes for Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act, 2013)
With the purpose of decreasing control of universal health care under the IRS, lawfully, Congress decided to just dubbed the bill calling it "Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act." This name does actually fit perfectly, especially because the IRS is now recognized for prejudiced practices and poor defense of citizen's confidential data. The objectives of this legislation are to stop the IRS from putting any portion of ObamaCare. American families are concerned about the bad effects they have already been experiencing from the believed to be flawed law, and could possibly believe that the full impact has yet to be seen. Research shows that the current IRS scandals have been proving that the agency is ineffective when it comes to achieving their simple duties, so many everyday people discover it hard to believe they would ever be proficient when it comes to implementing any form of health care.
When it comes down to legislation, the House of Representatives were the ones that gave a vote on a Friday that pointed in the direction of removing the Internal Revenue Service's authority to impose ObamaCare, a reply to the agency's pursuing of and conservative groups and Tea Party. On the other hand, the CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation have not completed a cost estimate for this bill (House Vote 447 - H.R.2009: On Passage, 2012). They are expecting that the legislation would significantly decrease both direct spending and incomes over the 2014-2023 time era. There are vital concerns concerning how the bill would affect the processes of the Department of the Treasury. Research shows that the payment of premium tax credits is uncertain especially when it comes to the effect of H.R. 2009. For the reason that persons are no longer instructed to but some kind of health insurance, they feel that less individuals would register in Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance programs causing decreased expenses for those programs (Price, 2012).
Who does this proposal effect?
Research shows that ObamaCare is considered a train wreck for a lot of people for the reason that this proposal will have an effect on American individuals which also include families and businesses. Experts of the proposal recognized that the health care law executes a huge tax on the American individuals and raids Medicare as a chief basis of funding, health care insurance premiums have gone up a lot ever since its implementation has been so disorganized.
And now, people are arguing that President Obama made a decision that he wants to further answer to the Internal Revenue Service which has dishonored their trust and forfeited its claim to a reputation of justice and neutrality. The IRS is in disaster. A year ago, my Committee demanded an audit that established the agency unsuitably besieged groups relating for tax-exempt status founded on definite words for instance "constitutional," "good government" and "freedom." (Kibble, 2012)Next, it was discovered that people were discovering information that makes the suggestion that the IRS subjected definite organizations already accepted for tax-exempt status to extra scrutiny throughout the 2012 election. And, this is the exact agency that will be accountable for applying and executing the President's health care law.
The influence and power of the IRS will develop exponentially in the next year to house the thousands of pages of ObamaCare. Since the law's individual order, all Americans will be essential to trust and submit the agency with personal health material that will be additionally communicated with other state and federal bureaucrats -- possibly opening the door to more misuse, more targeting and more aggravation of American citizens (Kibble, 2012). The law would permit people the chance to bail out of Medicaid Medicare and other federal health-care-advantage programs in favor of getting some kind of a tax credit; an individual's health coverage would be many experts would call "portable" -- no longer secured to a company -- so losing a job would not like wise mean losing some insurance; small businesses and individuals would be capable of accessing insurance pools that decrease risk for those with pre-prevailing circumstances, and they could buy plans across all of the state lines. Tort reorganizations would cut down on doctors' practicing "defensive medicine" and driving up costs by gathering needless procedures in an effort to evade lawsuits.
Social Conditions Surrounding the Proposal
One of the social conditions surrounding Keep the IRS Off your Health Care Act of 2013 - [H.R.2009] was that people would have to give up their privacy if they did not support this proposal which in return help them keep their privacy. A lot of politicians expressed distrust of the IRS, referring to all of the disclosures that went on in the early part of the year. One of the social conditions was to allow them entry which would have in turn exposed their information. Economically, ObamaCare will require individuals who can afford health insurance to purchase coverage or pay a tax advantage.
A lot of people who are now uninsured are anticipated to purchase policies by means of insurance interactions that are being set up. The rule necessitates private companies contributing in the exchanges to surrender data in regards to new customers to HHS so the agency can guarantee that these individuals have bought at least the smallest levels of coverage necessary by ObamaCare and confirm those getting federal assistance purchasing their procedures fall into qualifying income groups (King votes for Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act, 2013). The Breitbart article talks about the issues by some conservative administrations and periodicals that HHS could possibly share that information with those that are in the IRS. Nevertheless the story stops short of Cantor's assertion that the IRS will have admission to the data.
HHS officials recurrently have said they will not be looking for close facts from medical histories and guaranteed the department will not be sharing any part of the information with the IRS.
Links to Previous Public Policy in the United States
To some this bill was not a surprise because it reminds a lot of people of 1985 (Kibble, 2012). Pursuant to the necessities of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as edited, certain automatic cuts took place as of March 1, 2013. These much needed cuts involved a reduction to the refundable part of the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit for sure lesser tax-exempt companies that are…