Prison Condition in USA vs. Russia In assessing the human rights conditions of maximum security facilities, human rights groups look into 3 main areas: the duration of confinement; the conditions of confinement, and the criteria of eligibility. Each of these areas must be looked into individually and then considered in the context of the entire situation (Human Rights Watch). Quite a number of concerns have been raised about the human rights conditions of the individuals held in prisons including: mistreatment of inmates / detainees by prison officials; unsafe conditions; and lack of sufficient legal protection (United States Department of State, n.d.). This paper also compares the situation of prison facilities in the United States and Russia.

Introduction

The Standard Minimum Rules, or the SMRs for the Treatment of Prisoners are one of the most important international agreements on how prisoners should be handled. The SMRs were adopted in 1955 by a special United Nations congress (United States Department of State, 2012). However, studies have shown that most of the prison systems all around the globe do not treat prisoners at the standards recommended by the SMR agreement. In many nations, there is blatant disregard of international treaties on the treatment of prisoners and this paper deals with this issue with a special focus on the American and Russian prison systems.

According to the SMR, prison authorities have to treat prisoners with respect and human dignity. They should also not subject inmates to any form of treatment that could be classified as degrading, inhuman or cruel. It is however unfortunate that the public authorities in-charge of maximum security prisons are operating them in ways that basically violate human rights. The confinement conditions are unnecessarily severe and are not proportionate to the actual security concerns. The conditions also impose undue humiliation and suffering on the inmates. In short, inmates in maximum security facilities are treated with the lowest level of respect and without regards to human dignity (Human Rights Watch).

Literature review

Conditions

Currently there are more than 20,000 prisoners in the United States who are held in maximum security facilities or blocks. The typical...

They are allowed only a few hours to exercise or take shower, often in enclosed spaces.
Maximum security inmates have almost zero access to recreational or educational programs or any other kind of activity that can offer them mental stimulation. They are often handcuffed and escorted by a minimum of two prison officers every time they walk out of their cells (Human Rights Watch). Even for inmates that are truly dangerous such conditions are unnecessarily harsh especially when used for a prolonged period of time (Human Rights Watch).

Some prison officials and policymakers have admitted that some of the conditions in maximum security facilities are not for security purposes (Hounshell, 2010). They stress that such negative conditions are necessary as a deterrent to misconduct. There are, however many better ways to deter youths from committing crime than maintaining harsh conditions in maximum security facilities (Human Rights Watch).

In some states, maximum security inmates have access to "privileges" such as the television, radio or more telephone calls and can walk themselves to the shower without shackles or handcuffs. However, these privileges can often be taken away even for very small infractions (Human Rights Watch).

In the Russian Prison system, inmates in maximum security facilities such as Butyrka and Vladimir, are served in their cells. This is in contrast to America's Stateville where inmates have access to a common dining area. All prisoners at Butyrka and Vladimir are locked all day in their cells except for a 60-minute walk time and shower every 10 days. In contrast, inmates at Stateville can only be held all-day when they are in segregation or on lockdown. During…