Choosing one student over another

Societal and Economic Growth through Education
Introduction
The part played by higher education when it comes to sustainable societal and economic growth grows more significant year after year, a phenomenon that will continue in the coming decades. The higher education domain may be perceived to be the focus of knowledge as well as its application. It is an entity that contributes to a great extent to economic progress using advanced improving capabilities and promoting innovation. It may be perceived as a means of improving people’s quality of life, in addition to dealing with critical international and societal issues. This domain has been broadly described as one of the main factors responsible for prosperity, performance growth, and competitiveness. In line with UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization), the social role of higher education, on the one hand, presents a linkage between the educational and intellectual contributions of universities and social growth on the other. Skill acquisition and advancement are essential when it comes to improving individuals’ wellbeing and standard of living. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) maintains that investment in knowledge development and facilitating the spread of knowledge has a central part to play in creating high-salaried employment and improving productivity growth.
University student admission conditions are central to admission processes and the overall society since higher education offers individuals a chance to enjoy success in the current global economy. Contemporary universities offer students a variety of courses attempting to equip them to work in diverse economic sectors, and ensuring they remain and enjoy long-term progress within the labor market. They offer programs that make differences to labor market results and are up-to-date when it comes to international economic and innovation process changes. Universities support lifelong learning, presenting opportunities for professional engagement and attraction to career advancement and training.
Knowledge forms higher education’s real foundation: its creation through research, diffusion through instruction, and its attainment and application on the part of students. Therefore, excellence should be the chief goal of all higher education organizations, including universities within all nations. Russia, for instance, retains the historical role of universities as societal servants and critics and has lofty ambitions. Its major Project 5-100 universities assure excellence in training and knowledge imparted. These universities are allocating their resources to providing superior-quality education, motivating learners, and carefully considering their unique needs and profiles, improving educator training and experiences with best practices in teaching, and developing incentives for attracting educators with the most experience.
Selection of Applicants
Several factors need to be considered, in addition to academic capabilities, while reviewing admission applications. The points in applicant B’s favor are: he has superior educational skills, though an absence of opportunities affected his academic performance. Coming from a low-income background, coupled with the burden of his father’s untimely death, he had to assume the role of family breadwinner at a tender age. He was forced to juggle the management of the family business and education. He is also a minority ethnic group member – his ethnic group makes up only two percent of the overall student population. Since the university supports cultural diversity, his application may be seriously considered for his ethnicity and sound educational capabilities. Therefore, he deserves the opportunity of being enrolled in a quality university where he will finally be able to perform according to his intellectual abilities.
Applicant A’s application reveals excellent APs and SAT scores. He hails from an affluent family (annual family income of 340K) that is more than capable of offering him adequate financial support to ensure his higher education. He is a law organization intern (4 GPA) who has earned excellent educator recommendations. His intentions for pursuing the legal field are noble: he wishes to serve struggling individuals. He is clearly at an advantage, hailing from an affluent family. He has encountered no financial trouble and can easily choose whichever institution he desires. He certainly had access to quality tuitions to facilitate his superior academic performance as well as to various other unchosen advantages without difficulty or effort. Hence, his psychological wellbeing and health are also likely to be good, further contributing to his excellent academic performance.
Meanwhile, applicant B hails from a low-income background. His 78% SAT score – rather average in reality – ought to be regarded as an excellent score for one with financial struggles, who lacked opportunities for learning open to those from more privileged backgrounds. His financial efforts forced him to join the family business at a young age. Also, the untimely death of his dad at a tender age must have been a profoundly tragic and devastating experience for him. In this extremely tough time, his psychological wellbeing was also probably at stake. This is possibly why he failed in class several times and considered dropping out prematurely from school to support his family financially. Despite such childhood experiences, he persevered and completed high school together with managing the family business. He was not privileged enough to be educated from reputed schools or wherever he desired, all due to hailing from a low economic background. He blames all in the city for his lack of access to opportunities. In his opinion, social injustice and inequality are chiefly to blame for the main social issues in the city he hails from, including its alarming crime rate. His GPA score of 3.2, though rather average, ought to be regarded as a good score for him, on account of his complicated personal circumstances. He couldn’t afford tuitions or other learning supports in the course of his education. His circumstances prevented his superior performance in academics despite his skills. It is quite likely he would have been a high achiever were he to have had access to adequate opportunities and better financial conditions.
I believe Applicant B ought to be chosen for admission since he can perform well academically under the right circumstances. His purpose statement clearly states that all in his native city are to blame for his lack of access to opportunities. In his view, one’s financial background helps decide one’s success; he could personally have fared better in life if he had access to the right opportunities. He is at risk of developing a feeling of hopelessness in life. Several adequately qualified students belonging to more impoverished families fail at applying to selective universities, an issue commonly termed as ‘undermatching.’ Those hailing from poor/disadvantaged families may lack the resources which facilitate the leading of a comfortable life on the university campus. Consequently, they might be unable to take part in certain activities. Hence, they may benefit from universities that limit situations in which the deciding factor is student income.
Furthermore, he belongs to an ethnic group, which makes up a mere 2% of the university’s student population. However, the same ethnic group makes up 40% of the state population. Therefore, his inclusion will contribute to increasing cultural awareness and student diversity within the university, two aspects that are critical to both the institution and students, in the immediate as well as long run. Institutional diversity exposes enrollees to several social and cultural groups, equipping them to grow into better societal members. In today’s progressively greater multicultural and diverse world, it is essential, like never before, for educators to integrate culturally responsive and sensitive classroom instruction. A key element to bear in mind is: diversity isn’t only limited to the ethnic and racial background; it also encompasses religious background, linguistic origin, socioeconomic status, gender identity, and sexual orientation.
Bibliography
Afridi, Mehnaz. “Multicultural And Diversity  Guide For Students.” Accredited Schools Online, https://www.accreditedschoolsonline.org/resources/student-diversity-multicultural/
Drexel University. 2020. “The Importance of Diversity And Cultural Awareness In The Classroom.” https://drexel.edu/soe/resources/student-teaching/advice/importance-of-cultural-diversity-in-classroom/
QS Asia New Network. “Importance Of Higher Education For Today’s Economy” https://qswownews.com/importance-of-higher-education/