Death With Dignity: A Right or Not?
The issue of "euthanasia" is a matter of great controversy today. It is often difficult to judge who the "right" to die under the influence of euthanasia without the "power of attorney" should be afforded. Religiously, one cannot predict the "miracle" of God in daily life. For a patient to live through feeding-tube for the rest of his/her life in the hospital or nursing home does not show any dignity to our beloved ones. This paper will examine the issue of death and dignity from the perspective that all patients deserve to die with dignity, but face many obstacles in doing so.
One of the more frequent arguments against voluntary active euthanasia in the media and in literature is that "the push for a legalized right to die with medical assistance is a radical movement" carrying with it "alarming implications" for society (Ballis & Magnusson, 1999:312). Many feel that allowing one to voluntarily end life would perhaps result in a devaluing of life and the potential for abuse of vulnerable or ill patients (Ballis & Magnusson, 1999). However this argument is largely unfounded and based on fears and irrational misgivings about death rather than fact. There are many circumstances within the United States where patients have actively requested assistance to die in situation where they face debilitating illnesses. In...
Kevorkian ended up assisting 130 voluntary suicides by March of 1999. Michigan state had issued an injunction against use of Dr. Kevorkian's machine, and he was even charged with first degree murder, however these charges were unsuccessful and dismissed when a tape was produced showing that the individual he helped requested his assistance.
At the time there was no state statue that prohibited assisted suicide. Michigan legislature subsequently banned assisted suicide in February of 1993, however the act was later repealed (Zucker, 1999). Juries acquitted Kevorkian of three more trials through 1996. In 1998 however Kevorkian was charged and convicted of second degree murder, when he produced a videotape injecting a paralyzed man Thomas Youk with a lethal solution due to Lou Gehrig's disease (Zucker, 1999). The court would not permit family testimony thus the jury convicted him.
Kevorkian has been described as both 'sinister' and a life saver depending on who you talk to. His actions certainly bring to light the question of death with dignity (Bachman et. al, 1996). Kevorkian is one example of many physicians that support a patient's right to choose to participate in physician-assisted suicide. Such allowances could be administered with regulation to ensure that patients are not abused and that the patient's wishes are carried out.
There is a large body of research that has been conducted suggesting that most…
What the physician must take into account when approving the lethal medication is more than just the patient's state of mind and medical condition. The patient's family can and should be taken into consideration. Any patient whose family strongly and vocally opposes the physician-assisted suicide might have a more difficult time convincing a physician that the choice to euthanize is the right one. In addition to supporting the rights of
Death and Dying 'My new body was weightless and extremely mobile, and I was fascinated by my new state of being. Although I had felt pain from the surgery only moments before, I now felt no discomfort at all. I was whole in every way -- perfect," (Eadie "Embraced" 30). In her groundbreaking book Embraced by the Light, Betty J. Eadie writes about her own near-death experience to help dispel the
Grief or loss can cause change -- force evolution, if you will, into the human ability for personal growth and self-actualization. Certainly grief is a human emotion; as much a part of us (Kubler-Ross, 2009). Psychologically, grief is a response to loss -- conventionally emotional, but also having physical, cognitive, social, philosophical, and even behavioral dimensions. There are numerous theories about grief, some popularized, some scholarly, but all try to
Capital Punishment in the United States Capital punishment is one of the comprehensive, but debatable punishments given to criminal offenders in the U.S. And many other nations across the globe. Capital punishment involves the issuance of the death penalty because of committing serious crimes like crime in the society. Capital punishment has received tumultuous public support touching both ends of the society with its authorization in thirty-seven American states. It is
But still, Walker makes mention of the fact that control of the "various stages of disposing of a human corpse" has been (and is in some respects today) a tug-of-war between businessmen, clergy, and local health officials. Annotation for Three Ways to Arrange a Funeral Walker uses nearly 200 references (books, journal articles) in his bibliography, and so his is an article that spans centuries in its research on death and
The death penalty may exact a high cost but so does remaining behind bars for life imprisonment (Haag 1986). But righting wrongs in a society has a higher option than entailing the costs. Penalties are also acts of social retribution to restrain personal or private vengeance aimed at vindicating the law and social order, which has been injured or violated by a crime. Proponents or advocates of the death penalty