Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
DESCARTES' BELIEVE IN GOD
Descartes Believe in God
Descartes' Believe in God
Science attempts to prove how God did or does things. The assessment is heavily disputed by archaic religious doctrines. The traditional conflict between science and religion is entirely based on the dominion and not what is right or wrong. Rene Descartes' belief in God is not based on atheistic principles, but on blasphemy as seen from the way he investigates God's functions. Whilst examining Descartes' belief in the existence of God, it establishes that Descartes does not dispute the existence of God, but has a different opinion (parallel from the religion). A scientific argument proving Descartes' arguments and a reflection on his presumptions are provided.
Does Descartes believe in God?
As a philosopher and mathematician, Descartes dedicated his work entirely on writing and researching. His arguments combined humanism, science, and religion to arrive on the much-aggrandized assumptions of natural processes. Olson (2006) reflects Descartes' opinions on religion as scientific equation and God as a superior being that illuminates humanism (p.75). From Descartes' perspective, God has imbued humans with a special spirit and mind that communicate inherently. In fact, Descartes publications on science showed God as a superior being who controlled nature. However, Descartes was not a staunch believer although he was a diligent attendee of the Roman Catholic Church.
Evidently, Descartes observed religion because it fulfilled his natural approach in solving the critical syntax of humanism. Sweetman (2004) shows that Descartes' philosophy was primarily centered in epistemology where solutions to science and religion were based on the body and mind problems (p.49). Descartes' atheistic beliefs are primarily on the notions of the Enlightenment Era; people...
This idea is grounded on chauvinism and backed by the knowledge that one's belief was not questionable and a private affair. Descartes in a special case one not based on atheism, but blasphemy claims. It is conclusive to argue that Descartes applied religion and beliefs for his general humanity-based scientific endeavors.
Descartes arguments are convincing
Critical philosophy that was developed during the Enlightenment Era attempted to reexamine the relationship between civilization and religion. It is prudent to note that political ideologies that were spearheaded by communism and capitalism played a critical role in examining the validity of the church. Capitalism, which was heavily aided by religion, lost influence because of the negativity and the atrocities associated with it. McKnight (1999) argues that Enlightenment Era was heavily politicized to the extent that it eroded necessary dialogue (p.96). Constant collisions in ideology prompted the Enlightenment Era to pave way for the development of deism ideologies. These ideologies dogmatized the society in the belief of one single God and religious reasons were based on natural reason unlike the common supernatural revelations. In the end, the religious good was replaced by the social and political ideologies. In fact, Descartes fulfilled the natural laws accustomed to a politics-based religious platform like any other philosopher of the Enlightenment Era (Kohn 34).
Archaic religious beliefs of the medieval period were based on meditations on first philosophy. Williams (2009) presents the technicalities and relationships between religious…
Work Cited
Broughton, Janet and Carreiro, John. A Companion to Descartes. New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2010. Print
Kohn, Hans. The Idea Of Nationalism: A Study In Its Origins And Background. Transaction Publishers, 2005. Print
McKnight, Edgar. Jesus Christ in History and Scripture: A Poetic and Sectarian Perspective.
Some of the reason for error, therefore, is not related to indifference or for not having enough time to fully consider some matter. Some of it is due to man's propensity to flaw, and to his limited ability (which is related to his limited mental and physical power). In addition to misinterpreting the nature of the relationship between intellect and free will, Descartes has incorrectly interpreted some of the most
Descartes' Major Tenets Descartes Major Tenets Descartes was one of the most well-respected thinkers of his time, and he applied his special brand of logic to a wide-variety of disciplines, most notably mathematics and philosophy. The Cartesian approach to philosophy, like many approaches to philosophy, looked at the interaction of the mind and the brain. Were the mind and the brain one united organism, did they interact with one another, was one
Al-Ghazali, through his investigations, showed that both certainty of sense-perceptions (e.g. though the shadow of a stick that seems to imply that the stick is moving when it is not) and certainty of alleged intellectual truths (i.e. The possibility of judging an alleged fact in opposing and diverse manners) could be questioned. Turning to dreams, al-Ghazaali illustrates that wakefulness is simply a higher consciousness of the dream state. Might there
Different people analyze different situations differently and reach to different conclusions. In supporting his idea he further argued that the senses should not be trusted because people get fooled by their sense. This is due to the reason that many variables affect a person's way of looking and perceiving an event. That's why different people experience same event in different ways. I do agree with Descartes on this point but
This is indeed an absolutely profound concept in that it can't help but support the idea of the autonomous individual, existing in connection to thought. The truth of these emotions, be them good or bad, speak to the authenticity of the self. There's a notion of realness -- of the self that is a facet of the genuine, as emotions and desires are founded upon the genuine. This notion
Carrying it to the next logical step, he says that all opinions are false until proven otherwise, and perhaps it is not he himself who is responsible for his own deception, but rather it is "some deceitful demon" who is so clever and capable that he can blur the reality of "the sky, the air, the earth" into a dream or illusion. Meantime, Williams writes that Descartes is the kind of