Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
No Child Left Behind Historical Event
Introduction
Few historical events have had a bigger impact on curriculum in the US than the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) , which effectively changed the ways teachers taught all over the nation. By mandating standardized testing as part of a funding program, the federal government essentially created a standardized national curriculum. This paper will discuss the NCLB, its impact on education in the US, how it has influenced my understanding, and how it relates to my work.
NCLB
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was a federal law in the United States that was enacted in 2001 and aimed to improve the education system and close the achievement gap between different student populations (Powell et al., 2009). The law required states to develop standardized tests in reading and mathematics, and schools were held accountable for ensuring that all students reached proficiency in these subjects by 2014. NCLB also provided additional funding for schools serving low-income students, but it was criticized by some educators and lawmakers for its focus on standardized testing and its consequences for schools that failed to meet the proficiency targets. The law was eventually replaced by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in 2015, which shifted some of the decision-making power from the federal government back to the states.
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was enacted in 2001 against the backdrop of growing concerns about the state of public education in the United States. Throughout the late 20th century and early 21st century, there was a growing realization that American students were not performing as well as their peers in other countries, and that the achievement gap between different student populations was growing. There was also a growing sense of urgency about the need to improve public education, given the rapidly changing global economy and the growing importance of a highly educated workforce.
Impact on United States Education
The NCLB Act was significant because it represented a major shift in federal education policy, putting a new emphasis on accountability and measurable results. It effectively created a national curriculum in spirit if not precisely in letter. By mandating that in order for states to receive federal funds for education they had to...…Had this involvement not taken place, we might actually have better schools tailoring their efforts to the needs of their communities instead of trying to please Washington.
How It Relates to My Curriculum Work
The NCLB Act has affected my curriculum work by directing the way in which schools are evaluated and the types of interventions that are put in place in schools that are struggling to meet the proficiency targets. The law's requirement for states to intervene in schools that fail to meet the proficiency targets has led to an increased focus on school improvement, and has spurred the development of new strategies and programs. We are in a constant state of flux, crunching numbers and trying this new approach or that new approach, getting further and further away from traditional methods.
Conclusion
The NCLB Act had a significant impact on the American education system, and its legacy continues to shape discussions about education reform to this day. The law was eventually replaced by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in 2015, which shifted some of the decision-making power from the federal government back to the states, but its impact can still…
References
Byrd-Blake, M., Afolayan, M. O., Hunt, J. W., Fabunmi, M., Pryor, B. W., & Leander, R.
(2010). Morale of teachers in high poverty schools: A post-NCLB mixed methods analysis. Education and urban society, 42(4), 450-472.
Menken, K. (2009). No Child Left Behind and its effects on language policy. Annual Review of
For Bush, the "formation and refining of policy proposals" (Kingdon's second process stream in policymaking) came to fruition when he got elected, and began talking to legislators about making educators and schools accountable. Bush gave a little, and pushed a little, and the Congress make its own changes and revisions, and the policy began to take shape. The third part of Kingdon's process stream for Bush (politics) was getting the
Growth models are more reliable in NCLB research because: a) status models depend on data that is "vertically scaled" (measuring from one grade to the next); b) status models can be linked to "individual students or schools over time"; and c) status models sometimes employ "hierarchical linear modeling" -- a more sophisticated and potentially esoteric technique (Azin, p. 74). Meanwhile, growth models are more effective in evaluating the success of
(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents
No Child Left Behind and Black Males No child left behind No Child Left Behind: Cause and Effect Essay The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was passed in 2001 in order to improve overall students' performance and to decrease the performance gap between minority and mainstream students. However other effects have emerged since its implementation. Through this cause and effect essay, author sheds light on effects of the NCLB. It has been
State education agencies and local school districts needs to work to incorporate the major provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act (U.S. Department of Education, 2004a). The evaluator feels it is imperative that as teacher preparation programs, along with state and local education agencies, address the training, recruitment, and retention of highly qualified teachers and conduct counseling sessions for every American classroom. Teacher education programs can prepare future teachers
Many states don't want to lower their standards, including Minnesota, New Hampshire and Hawaii, and legislators have seriously debated withdrawing from NCLB, even though it would mean they would lose federal money that is tied to it. However, as the first national suit points out, no funding except the promised NCLB funding is supposed to be tied to it; the Education Department has apparently been making its own interpretation