Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Addressing Income Inequality: Evaluating and Advocating Policy Solutions
This policy proposal should be submitted to the House Committee on Ways and Means, as this committee is responsible for overseeing tax policy and revenue-raising measures in the United States. The proposal could also be presented to the Senate Committee on Finance, which has jurisdiction over tax policy and related matters at the federal level.
I. Introduction
Income inequality has been a growing concern in the United States, with the rich getting richer while the middle and lower classes struggle to maintain their standard of living. This paper will identify the issue of income inequality and discuss the problems surrounding it, drawing upon a minimum of four academic/legitimate sources from current events-related or scholarly journals.
II. Problem Statement
Income inequality has widened over the past few decades, leading to a more unequal society with a significant wealth gap. This has resulted in various social and economic problems, including reduced social mobility, increased poverty, and negative impacts on economic growth (Piketty, 2014; Stiglitz, 2012).
III. Potential Solutions
Universal Basic Income (UBI)
One proposed solution to income inequality is the implementation of a universal basic income (UBI), which would provide a guaranteed income to every citizen regardless of their employment status (Yang, 2018). UBI would help reduce poverty and improve financial security for low-income individuals, and it could potentially stimulate economic growth by increasing consumer spending (Raventos, 2007).
Progressive Taxation
Another potential solution to income inequality is to implement a more progressive taxation system, which would require higher-income earners to pay a larger share of their income in taxes (Saez & Zucman, 2019). This would help redistribute wealth and potentially reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, providing more resources for social programs and investments in public goods (Piketty, Saez, & Stantcheva, 2014).
IV. Comparison of Solutions
UBI
Strengths
UBI provides financial security for all citizens, reducing poverty and promoting social mobility (Yang, 2018). It ensures that everyone has a basic income, and it can help alleviate financial stress and provide a safety net for those who are struggling to make ends meet. Additionally, UBI may stimulate economic growth by increasing consumer spending (Raventos, 2007). When people have more money to spend, they are more likely to purchase goods and services, which in turn can boost the economy.
Weaknesses
However, there are several weaknesses associated with UBI. One significant concern is the high...…and families. Plus, progressive taxation provides more funding for social programs and public goods. It allows for investments in essential public services such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These investments benefit all citizens and can have a long-term positive impact on reducing income inequality by promoting social mobility and economic opportunity.
In contrast, the high implementation costs of UBI make it a less attractive option for addressing income inequality. Also, the potential inflationary effects of UBI could further exacerbate economic inequality by disproportionately affecting low-income households, which are more vulnerable to rising prices.
Overall, it can reasonably be argued that the idea of progressive taxation is more politically feasible than UBI, as it is less likely to face significant opposition from interest groups and the public.
VI. Conclusion
In conclusion, this paper has identified the issue of income inequality and discussed the problems surrounding it. Two potential solutions, universal basic income and progressive taxation, were compared and contrasted, taking into consideration the obstacles posed by interest groups, the media, public opinion, federalism, the bureaucracy, and separation of powers. Ultimately, progressive taxation was advocated as the better policy response to address income inequality, given its direct impact on the…
References
Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age.
Princeton University Press.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014). Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Taleof Three Elasticities. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(1), 230-271.
Raventos, D. (2007). Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom. Pluto Press.
Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and Howto Make Them Pay. W.W. Norton & Company.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers OurFuture. W.W. Norton & Company.
Widerquist, K. (2018). A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers,Policymakers, and Citizens. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yang, A. (2018). The War on Normal People: The Truth About America's Disappearing Jobs andWhy Universal Basic Income Is Our Future. Hachette Books.
Zucman, G. (2015). The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens. University ofChicago Press.
The income and wealth gap continues to grow at a faster and faster rate because there is ever more power to affect policy provided to those that have such substantial incomes. Education and Healthcare There are other less direct ways in which the income gap is self-perpetuating, as well, establishing a system that purports to be meritocratic -- based on merit, where everyone has an equal chance to succeed based on
His assertion that the idea of "mass production" must also be accompanied by "mass consumption" is based on the idea that the individual has the economic resources to be able to purchase goods. This, by its very nature, implies that income is distributed throughout society, and in situations where it is not, it leads to economic crisis'. In the case of the United States in the 1920's, the kind
Having a free market economy is one of the things that makes growth possible, although there is also inherent risk in it. More than one company can offer services, and the competition of more than one or two companies will help to keep services competitive and prices low. Competition, however, can also have its problems. Because of the way that some products are packaged and structured, and the multiple
Various factors are taken into consideration when calculating the income distribution, out of which the nominal income is most common. Aside form this, attention should be given to consumption levels of both subsidy products (food, clothing, housing) as well as to luxury products and services. In addition, several social and demographic criteria of the population must be considered, such as the level of education, housing facilities (personal property or rental),
It is grossly inefficient not to means-test Social Security and Medicare. I would fix these programs by making them both means-tested. This would result in more efficient transfers to seniors who actually need the money, rather than giving money to seniors who do not need it. This would free up more money to other Americans -- even if just the average taxpayer by way of allowing for a balanced
Labor Income The Labor Market and Income Inequality Studies of the labor market have long struggled to explain the relationship between supply and demand in the labor market with the income or wage levels the labor market offers. The volatility in both of these areas -- that is, volatility both in the demand for labor and in wages -- has made it all but impossible for an adequate model to be designed