It can be especially bad if it appears that the company was trying to cover up the problem. That is why self-auditing is such an important benefit to companies.
Unfortunately, many companies choose not to self audit. They do not want to look for problems because they expect to find some. Finding problems means reporting problems, which means paying fines. A lot of companies do not want to pay them, even if they are less when they are found through self-auditing. These companies just leave their pollution problems uncorrected and hope that the EPA won't pay them a surprise visit where they will have to try to hide their problems.
Clearly, the economic benefits and the social benefits of pollution control and the Clean Water Act are quite high, although not everyone realizes how important it is to make sure that the water stays clean; not only for the people and animals who live here now, but for future generations. Companies get rewarded for not polluting, and because companies are not polluting, people, animals, and plants everywhere are enjoying clean, clear water. When companies do not pollute it is a win-win situation for everyone involved, including the federal government, because they do not have to deal with all of the costs associated with companies who pollute the water. Costs can be a big problem for companies and for the government. Regulating pollution control is very expensive.
As with benefits, costs of pollution are both economic and social. There are fines, of course, for companies that pollute the water and show a disregard for the safety and well being of the environment and the people and animals that live in it. Social costs are things like people not buying a company's products because they know the company pollutes the water. There are other costs as well. For example, it is often very cheap, economically speaking, to pollute, and very expensive to make sure that one does not. The kind of equipment needed to keep pollution down to a specific level are...
They assume that they can get away with the pollution for a while. When they get caught, it often costs them more than it would have if they had just bought the anti-pollution equipment in the first place. Now they still have to buy the equipment on top of all of the fines and penalties the government imposes on them.
Citizen enforcement of the Clean Water Act is one of the newest ways to keep companies honest. Citizens are empowered to file suit against a company that they know is polluting too much or operating without a permit. The fines for this can be up to $27,500 per day per violation, as well as the litigation costs and reasonable attorney's fees (Smith, 1997).
The EPA and other governing bodies do not always have the manpower they need to keep an eye on every company to make sure that they are not polluting more than they should be. Some pollution is to be expected, but the company has to have permits and stay within pre-set limits. It is not just a matter of looking at water coming from a pipe and saying that the company is polluting too much. The Clean Water Act is time-consuming and difficult to enforce. That is why attorneys like Richard Smith (1997) are taking up the cause and helping watchdog groups file suit against companies that they believe are polluters, and that is also why individuals that are concerned about their environment must speak up and make a strong case for sustainable development.
Economic Incentives. 2002. United States Government. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer782/aer782d.pdf.
Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 (Clean Water Act). 2002. United States Government. http://www.usbr.gov/laws/cleanwat.html.
Gibbs, D. 1998a. "Regional development agencies and sustainable development." Regional Studies, 32(4): 365-368.
Gibbs, D.C., et al. 1998b. "Struggling with sustainability': weak and strong interpretations of sustainable development within local authority policy." Environment and Planning, 30(8): 1351-1365.
Gilbert, a. 1996. "Criteria for sustainability in the development of indicators for sustainable development." Chemosphere 33(9): 1739-1748.
Girard, L.F. 1998. "The institutional dimension of urban sustainable development." International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 10(1): 163-176.
Glasbergen, P. 2000. "The Environmental Cooperative: Self-Governance in Sustainable Rural Development." Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9(3): 240-59.
McDonald, G.T. 1996. "Planning as sustainable development." Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(3): 225-236.
Pfaff, Alexander S.P., and Sanchirico, Chris William. 1999. Environmental self-auditing: setting the proper incentives for discovery and correction of environmental harm. Columbia University. http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/events/econSeminar/PfaffSanchirico.pdf.
Smith, Richard a. 1997. Citizen suits put teeth in Clean Water Act. The Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce. http://www.djc.com/special/enviro97/10030780.htm.
Sustainable tourism does not destroy the environment, economy, or cultural aspects of the tourist destination (David Vaughan, 2000). Sustainable tourism is aimed at ensuring that those concerned are not affected in any way and that a positive development is realized through it. Back in the 1980s, ecotourism which consisted of activities such as wildlife exotic cultures and nature, became more common with remarkably few people understanding what the impacts of
Interior and Commerce Department agencies are to determine which species should be listed; individuals may petition the agencies to have species designated. The Fish and Wildlife Service, in the Interior Department, deals with land species; the National Marine Fisheries Service, located in the Commerce department, has jurisdiction over marine species. Any 'interested person' may petition the Interior Secretary to list a species as either endangered or threatened. The 1978
Sustainable Development - a Global Challenge Need for Change State Sovereignty Sustainable Development Challenges for Businesses The Role of MNCs in Sustainable Development The Global Compact Initiatives outside the Global Compact What is International Sustainable Development Law (ISDL)? International Environmental Law and its Impact on Australia Sustainable Development: A Global Challenge For many years, sustainable development has been one of the controversial issues faced by world leaders and citizens (Parmetier, 2002). The issue pervades both private and public sectors, and is
Sustainable Development While reflecting on some of the events that have transpired over the last decade, it may be no wonder why people have fueled the debate and salience of concepts related to sustainable development. Countless corporate scandals such as Enron and many others pointed out some of the questionable business practices in the modern economy. Also the sub-prime mortgage markets have gained large amounts of negative publicity for their systemic
Some companies, perhaps sensing a business opportunity, have tried to use the green textile movement to their advantage. DuPont and other chemical companies have targeted a potentially hopeful resource for the future in the form of enzymes, which can be very effective in fiber preparation, pre-treatment and value-added finishing as catalysts. Because enzymes work "even under mild conditions and do not require the high energy input often associated with chemical
Since 1972, population has indeed carried on rapid growth, but per-capita incomes have risen even faster. From 1972, when China and India could not feed their populations, both have become food exporters. The Club of Rome made the same mistake as their "limited world" predecessors, Malthus and Marx. They thought of people as reactive automatons, unable to change their behavior or their consumption. The Club of Rome should have