The Toxic Political Climate Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1508
Cite

¶ … Subtext I recently went on a trip to the Joshua Tree National Park. Even with the fact that a trip to a national park is not an earth-shattering or major event, it is still important nonetheless because of the raw beauty and splendor that is to be found from such parks. Even so, my trip to the Joshua Tree park was significant and life-changing on a number of levels. Indeed, the part itself is a metaphor if one looks at it the right way. Whether it be culture, the confluence of nature's forces or other things like that, taking things in at too small a perspective and/or without metaphorical comparisons in mind is less than wise. I will explain what I mean by that and that explanation will have two main facets.

First, it should be noted that when I went on the trip, I was not alone. I was with my friends Hiro and Albert. Both of them are of different cultures than I am given that Hiro is Japanese and Albert is Spanish. It is perhaps a bit odd that a group like us would come together but it happened with us and it has worked well. The comparison between us and the park we were visiting was initially lost on me but I came to a realization as I was in the area. Indeed, one of the common themes and lessons about Joshua Tree is that it is a collision of two major parts of nature in the United States. The park, of course, is in Southern California and it is the point in which there is a merging of the Colorado Desert and the Mojave Desert. The namesake of the area is the Joshua Trees that that litter the terrain. The area is also full of a lot of people that climb and hike the trails and there is also the Coachella Valley that is nearby. Even though the Mojave and Colorado areas in question are both deserts, they are both very different in size, scope, terrain and so on. Even with the fact that water being scarce is a commonality with so many different types of desert, the areas are still quite different. They merge together rather seamlessly in some regards but there are clear differences in other regards.

This is where the first metaphor happens to come in. Despite the fact that myself, Hiro and Albert come from entirely different backgrounds, we also found a way to come together in a way that fits and melds us. Rather than clashing and finding an issue with our differences, we are instead quite cohesive despite the different upbringings, cultures and patterns of our life. There are many instances where this sort of interaction happens and the overall outcome is less than positive. However, we never really paid any mind to all of that and we just gelled well together because we have common interests, aspirations and goals. There are entirely too many people out there that get unnecessarily nervous and uptight about what makes us different. My two friends and I know we are different but we don't let that get in the way of our common interests or our friendship. It would seem that some people are hung up on that sort of thing and that is truly unfortunate. Indeed, there is a difference between knowing that each of us are different yet finding common...

...

Even with the fact that they are very different, the two desert patches that merge at Joshua Tree do not harm or work against each other. Instead, there is a harmony that is quiet yet visually striking when comparing the two visions and views. Just as with my group of friends, it would probably be easy to track the people who just look at the two deserts merging and focus on the dichotomy and differences. It would also be easy to see people that marvel how well all of it fits together despite the disparate nature of the interaction. For sure, there are people that focus on what makes the two areas different and there are others that focus on what brings them together and unties them.
Both of the above lines of thought could easily be compared to society at large in the United States, or even the world. SO much of the literature and scholarly discourse out there, not to mention the societal chatter that happens, is focused on the dichotomies and differences that exist out there. Whether it be East vs. West, the North vs. the South, Liberal vs. Conservative, Republican vs. Democrat or anything else that is commonly bandied about and talked to death in the modern lexicon, there are also a lot of things that bring us together, that we have in common and that give us a bond. That latter part is seemingly missing in a lot of what happens in today's society and perhaps people should just slow down and think about how our disparate ideas and ideologies can absolutely be forged together in a way that works rather than being the genesis of some continued fray that just never ends.

Even with all of the high rhetoric and banter I have just laid forth, it is sometimes easier said than done to achieve the peace and tranquility that is desired by many. For sure, there are clear differences between my two friends and I when it comes to certain things. We do have different worldviews, we do have different walks of life in some main respects and we do have a different way of looking at things, depending on the issue. However, while we sometimes butt heads here and there, we are able to move past that and realize and respect that not everyone sees things our way, and that would include the three of us when comparing each other. This is not to say that we just learned how to do that straight off the top and that we've never had problems with adjusting and learning from each other. At the same time, none of us have any preference or demand of struggle or dissention. There are times and places to stand firm and not just try to be nice. However, most situations could and should call for a calm approach that is based on trying to understand how we can mesh and fuse together idea-wise much like the Joshua Tree park does much the same thing when it comes to the two deserts and there intersection.

The big issue that seems to be lost on many…

Cite this Document:

"The Toxic Political Climate" (2017, April 06) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-toxic-political-climate-2164967

"The Toxic Political Climate" 06 April 2017. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-toxic-political-climate-2164967>

"The Toxic Political Climate", 06 April 2017, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-toxic-political-climate-2164967

Related Documents

Another unfortunate reality is that simply banning the discharge of effluents into the Olifants River will only stymie efforts to improve the economic situation of the region. New mining, agricultural, and electrical interests are being encouraged to invest in the region because they will facilitate economic growth and propel communities out of poverty. An outright ban on the discharge of effluents into the Olifants River will have the net

Climate Change
PAGES 4 WORDS 1343

Climate change and its impact Introduction Climate is a part of our everyday lives. The change in temperature, swift winds blowing by and rainfall are all because of climate. The United Nation Framework Convention on climate defines climate change as an alteration of the atmosphere because of direct or indirect human activity that jeopardizes the natural climate viability observed over a period. Climate change is tracked using various instruments measuring every aspect

" (Rosenbaum, p. 12-13) This demonstrates the uphill climb facing President Obama, not just in terms of gaining political momentum to return the United States to a place of respect in the global environmental movement but also to develop regulatory goals and standards that will have a meaningful impact on environmental standards. It is important for Obama to differentiate himself from his predecessors during this campaign with a policy agenda that

Key political factors that led to Eisner’s downfall Michael Eisner’s reign as the CEO and Chairman of Disney can to an end on March 3rd, 2004, after 43% of the company’s shareholders withheld their endorsement and failed to endorse his position on the Board. He stayed as the CEO of the company for one more year then left (Forbes & Watson, 2010). However, the downfall of Eisner has been precipitated by

Nova Scotia Government and Politics The government's environmental discourse of "sustainable prosperity" emphasizes that in Nova Scotia the province's financial future is intensely attached with the task of making a cleaner environment. The province's Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act pursue to "validate global leadership by having one of the cleanest and most maintainable Environments in the world by the year 2020." The choice to relax an environmental target is perplexing for

The limitations of Paulson's role also reflect the social and political contexts of his actions. The role of Treasury Secretary has changed little in decades, and the powers of the office are as such limited. Paulson points out that "innovation precedes regulation," a situation that leaves him in frustration when dealing with Bear Stearns and other impending crises. This reflects another challenge of his job -- at Goldman Sachs he