Future Energy: Guiding Decisions Evidence in order reduce negative environmental impacts growing human population increasing demands energy technological advances continue, individual countries, states, cities households opportunity shift energy sources renewable Most consumers are unaware of the extreme negativeness surrounding their consumption of goods and that it inevitably leads to environmental degradation. However, there seems to be a more conscious effort to go around the negative impact of consumption of energy by choosing renewable sources. In this essay, we will assess a particular region in America and that is the state of Florida with specific references to certain areas in order to observe what sources of energy are currently used and what renewable sources may be best suitable and least suitable in the area, considering climate and the environment.

With climate changes accelerating at a fast pace, Miami, which is already subject of the increase of Earth's temperatures and rise of sea levels, may have to face harder living conditions in the near future. Being a prominent city in the United States, fast paced, and prosperous, it is only natural that a consumption of energy is higher than in other areas of the country. Being a business center, Miami's use of energy within buildings is what causes greenhouse gas emissions that account for more than half of the city's use of energy. Electricity is the main source of energy that fuels almost all of Miami's buildings. With temperatures rising up to 35° C. during the summer, air conditioning is what constitutes much of the energy consumption, along with lighting and the running of electrical equipments, computers most often. This works completely disadvantageous because up to 30% of energy use is being wasted through a neglectful usage, thus adding up greenhouse gas emissions without any justifiable means, really.

The main supplier of Florida state, Florida Power and Light uses a fuel mix which does not rely so...

d., p. 3). With 53% of natural gas production, FPL can thus pride itself with offering a much cleaner productive environment in regards to energy production, being known that coal, while representing the cheapest source for producing electricity, it is also the dirtiest, thus causing more pollution. Indeed, as opposed to burning oil, natural gas which is a fossil fuel in liquid form, releases up to 25% less pollutants. However, considering that two types of three of the methane gas that constitute natural gas are not renewable, it is hard to approximate just how much resource will the Earth's subterranean reservoirs be able to provide in a long-term production.
FPL's energy production is also 22% based on nuclear power. Although this technique is less dependent of fossil fuels, in this respect, there is more of an issue with radioactive waste which is not only extremely environmental polluting, but also potentially dangerous to humans. Suffice to say, there is no source of energy to be produced while being able to secure one 100% either safe or clean environment. However, there are ways to reduce consumption so that ultimately, the negative effects may be brought to a minimum, or else, an acceptable level. In Miami, as throughout the States, the weatherization practice has proved effective in helping buildings to reduce energy consumption by conservation. Such techniques are all the more beneficial to businesses since it…