Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The so-called "moral majority" does not like the idea of a woman "getting away" with "irresponsible sex."
However, not all failures of birth control are due to irresponsibility. A woman whose partner's condom broke during sex should have a second chance (a "Plan B" as the issue has come to be called) to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. Even if the sex is irresponsible and unprotected, young teenagers, for example -- would it really be better to let the girl become pregnant, later to become an abortion statistic or an unwilling, immature, unprepared mother? The opposition hates the idea that a woman can escape the consequences of recreational sex. They have a punitive attitude toward sex and especially they are against sex for fun. Medical, nursing, and family planning organizations are all in favor of emergency contraception (Ferriman, 1996). Why should the moralistic ideas of a few be forced on the rest of us? Nobody says they have to take a morning-after pill. This is supposed to be a free country. Sexual morality, birth control, and abortions are personal and private matters, and, in fact, the Supreme Court has ruled that privacy is a right that women already have -- a right protected by the U.S. Constitution to make their own reproductive decisions.
In the United States alone we could reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies by half with the use of emergency contraception. Moreover, by making it available over the counter, the time between the unprotected sex and taking the emergency contraceptive could be dramatically reduced. The sooner it is taken the better. If the sex happened on a Friday night, for example, the woman would not have to wait until Monday to get a prescription from her doctor. She could go to the pharmacy and buy it. The only people who oppose the morning-after pill are anti-choice groups who oppose all birth control.
Emergency contraception is extremely safe. A combined dose of four 50-microgram pills is only about 1/3 of the estrogen contained in a month's supply of birth control pills. Women in the 1960s, when birth control pills first came out, took 50-micrograms every single day! Other medicines, which were once prescription-only, have become over the counter medicines with no problems -- why not this needed product? Ferriman (1996) reports, "Nine out of ten women who have had abortions say they would have preferred to use emergency contraception if they had known about it." She also states that 70% of abortions could be prevented by emergency contraception.
The FDA stated as its reason for not allowing over-the-counter sales that the company, Barr Pharmaceuticals, had not proven that women under 17 are able to read the label and take the medicine correctly. Only 29 of the 565 women in Barr's study were women under 17 (Gardiner, 2004). This smacks of falsehood and seems a contrived excuse for caving in to right-wing moralists who believe they should be able to dictate what's right and wrong for everyone. It means women will continue to require a prescription from the doctor in order to take "Plan B."
The morning-after pill is one more strategy for controlling reproduction. It offers women a second chance to avoid an unwanted pregnancy, a "Plan B" to go to if the first plan fails. Emergency contraception is safe and reliable and effective for nearly 90% of women. Why should a woman be saddled with a pregnancy she does not want and isn't ready for, when she can take action to prevent conception? Taking a morning-after pill is far from irresponsible. It makes good sense.
CBS News (2004). FDA rejects OTC morning-after pill. Retrieved 7/30/06: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/06/15/health/main623159.shtml.
Ferriman, A. (1996). The day after sex. New Statesman (London, England), 127 (4388), 5 June, 28-29.
Gardiner, H. (2004). U.S. rules morning-after pill can't be sold over the counter.
New York Times, May 7: Retrieved 8/2/06: http://query.nytimes.com/gest/fullpage.html?sec=health&res+9C00E5DE173CF934A35756
Kaufman, M. (2005). FDA official quits over delay on Plan B. The Washington Post.
Retrieved 8/1/06: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/31/AR2005083101271.html.
Moore, K. (2005). Missed conception. The Nation, 277 (2) 24 July, 14.
Neff, D. (1997). Mourning the morning after. Christianity Today, 41, 7 Apr., 11.
Sarler, C. (1996). At last!…[continue]
"Morning After Pill In May " (2006, August 02) Retrieved December 7, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/morning-after-pill-in-may-71317
"Morning After Pill In May " 02 August 2006. Web.7 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/morning-after-pill-in-may-71317>
"Morning After Pill In May ", 02 August 2006, Accessed.7 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/morning-after-pill-in-may-71317
That decision though is generally influenced by which methods are socially acceptable within an individual's community, and which methods are most completely understood. It is important, then, for educators and physicians to not only inform women that the pill exists, but they must also explain how it works and why it should be used. Emergency contraception in pill form is a dose of estrogen and/or progestin, generally taken in two
5 mg of levonorgestrel each. The first dose is taken within 72 hours followed by the second dose 12 hours later. This method was first developed by Yuzpe and Lancee in 1977 and hence the name. The most common problems associated with these pills are minor side effects such as nausea and vomiting reported in 50% and 20% of women respectively.  the long-term effects are unknown since not much data
Any weight loss, say doctors, is good weight loss. If there is some minor contribution the medication gives to the whole process, then that's positive. If taken strictly according to instructions, at worst, diet pills are harmless for the most part. Effects of Dietary Supplements The FDA regulates dietary supplements only in that it is required to ensure their safety. A manufacturer is not required to register a supplement or have
Fertility Factors Procreation and human reproduction is one of the great and mysterious blessings human kind can experience. Females have a special relationship to this process due to the biological functions assigned to their bodies, requiring responsibility in choice in utilizing this gift of life. The purpose of this essay is to explore the factors affecting fertility by specifically examining the issue of the factors that contribute most to a woman's
Two of them are recommended agents of STI (Sexually Transmitted Infection) or HIV transmission prevention: dental dams and condoms Centchroman is a "Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, or SERM. It causes ovulation to occur asynchronously with the formation of the uterine lining, preventing implantation of a zygote. It has been widely available as a birth control method in India since the early 90s, marketed under the trade names Centron® and Saheli®.
Birth Control and Abstinence Birth Control vs. Abstinence Although birth control methods and abstinence are widely acknowledged and practiced, it is necessary to consider their pros and cons. Every female holds the right to decide if and at what time she wants to become pregnant. For couples who are planning for pregnancy, the use of birth control methods until they are prepared facilitates them in making sure that the mother and the newborn
What both these issues show is how advances technology / medicine are changing the overall scope of the ethical debate within the medical and legal communities. Together all of these events have helped to shape the way various ethical standards for medicine would evolve. This is important because they would clearly define the most appropriate conduct for medical research and how to interact with patients in the health care industry.