Controlling Benefit Costs One of the Most Essay

Excerpt from Essay :

Controlling Benefit Costs

One of the most serious dilemmas facing organizations today is how to maximize profits in an extremely competitive global environment. Of course, organizations need employees, and there is a cycle that has been growing over the past three decades or so in which employees and other stakeholders are expecting greater benefit packages in order to stay with their employer. The reality of 21st century organizational environments is so competitive for some positions that employers are faced with the issue of having to increase benefits or lose top employees. Governmental regulations are now encroaching into this paradigm as well, and employee costs are now almost always one of the top two expenses for the organization. For most employers, managing these costs has a direct relationship to profitability, the ability to remain competitive in the marketplace and even new business development. However, over the last few years these benefit costs continue to rise an average of 10-15% per annum, now seeing renewal rate increases as high as 40% in some markets. Organizations cannot, in good conscience, remain competitive by raising their prices to offset these costs, and despite stakeholder liberalization and pleas for transparency, cannot diminish profits for stockholders or commitments to the environment, sustainability and modernization.

From a strategic point-of-view, this conundrum has forced many organizations to rethink their Human Resources Department. In the past, Human Resources Management was more of an industry dependent way of filling open positions within organizations, managing some training, ensuring compliance with legal issues, and acting as a buffer when an employee needed to be disciplined or terminated. Modern Strategic HR Management, though, is not simply using computers to recruit and assist in hiring or firing, but the planning and implementation of information management, organizational management, and marketing to support the entire business operation. In effect, it is taking the idea of staffing, retention and training and deconstructing the HR portion to individual managers and employees. The organization thus looks to HR for expertise in planning and adapting both strategic and tactical planning (Walker, 2004).

Benefits are inexorably tied with both functions and effeciencies within the organization, and if benefits are to be offered at greater costs, it is also imperative that HR helps manage effeciencies as well. To improve and match stakeholder expectations, the modern Strategic Human Resource management department must be in place and attuned to the strategic and tactical goals of the organization. SHRM also includes risk management and planning, legal compliance, improvement in diversity issues, retention and employee development and above all, anticipating strategic needs and finding ways to act upon them. HR operates under the paradigm that individuals all have unique motivations, goals and drives. It is the HR professional's job, then, to define and implement the diverse needs that will benefit all stakeholders. When HRM is properly employed, members of the workplace feel safe to express their goals and opinions about operating practices within the organization; and the organization feels safe in dialog between management and employees, the sharing of both strategic and tactical goals, and to find ways to develop and enhance job satisfaction while, at the same time, achieving fiscal goals and objectives (Effron & Goldsmith, 2008).

Now we add another conundrum, the Affordable Care Act and the requirements for many organizations. Healthcare reform of some type is no longer an illusion nor is it a maybe -- it is a fact and will have widespread and radical transformative issues during the next few years. In fact, most experts believe that after getting through the recession, most providers are finally on more sound economic footing, just in time to face the deadlines and changes from the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009…

Sources Used in Document:

REFERENCES

Effron, M., & Goldsmith, M. (2008). Human Resources in the 21st Century. New York: Wiley.

Harrison, J.D. (2013). Health care law's aggregation rules pose a compliance nightmare. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/on-small-business/health-care-laws-aggregation-rules-pose-a-compliance-nightmare-for-small-businesses/2013/12/09/87b2dcc6-611d-11e3-bf45-61f69f54fc5f_story.html

Nather, D. (2013). How Obamacare affects businesses -- large and small. Politico. Retrieved from: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/how-obamacare-affects-businesses-large-and-small-97460.html

Walker, J. (2004). What's a Strategic HR Leader to Do? Human Resource Planning. 27(4): 61-9.

Cite This Essay:

"Controlling Benefit Costs One Of The Most" (2014, February 20) Retrieved December 6, 2019, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/controlling-benefit-costs-one-of-the-most-183271

"Controlling Benefit Costs One Of The Most" 20 February 2014. Web.6 December. 2019. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/controlling-benefit-costs-one-of-the-most-183271>

"Controlling Benefit Costs One Of The Most", 20 February 2014, Accessed.6 December. 2019,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/controlling-benefit-costs-one-of-the-most-183271