Solar is the Solution, author Steve Heckeroth argues that solar energy is the key to alleviating climate change. Heckeroth builds his argument on the statement that "Solar is a promising source of future energy supplies because not only is it clean, it's remarkably abundant." Another one of Heckeroth's claims is that "relying on coal, oil and natural gas threatens our future with toxic pollution, global climate change and social unrest caused by diminishing fuel supplies." These statements are internally valid; although Heckeroth does not provide quantitative data to back up these statements, they are easy to reference. Moreover, Heckeroth establishes his own credibility as an author qualified to write about environmental science by stating "I have been studying our energy options for more than 30 years." Of course, "studying" something for thirty years does not automatically make a person an expert. Heckeroth is admitting that he is a layperson who feels passionately about solar energy. To make his case about the viability of solar energy as the best solution to the problem of global warming, Heckeroth uses a series of logical formulations.
One of Heckeroth's premises is that solar energy is "virtually inexhaustible." From this premise, Heckeroth draws the...
"If we choose solar we don't have to wait for a new technology to save us. We already have the technology and energy resources we need to build a sustainable, solar-electric economy that can cure our
addiction to oil, stabilize the climate and maintain our standard of living."
Then, Heckeroth discusses each of the existing energy technologies in turn to provide logical cases for why each one is bad, and should be given up in favor of solar
power. He first addresses coal, oil, and natural gas. Coal is inefficient, therefore coal is bad, states Heckeroth. Moreover, coal releases carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide contributes to global warming and pollution. Therefore, coal is bad.
Nuclear energy is dangerous because of the storage of nuclear waste. Therefore, nuclear energy is bad. Natural gas is devastating to the
environment during the extraction process, and it also includes dependence on foreign sources. Therefore, natural gas is bad. Oil is expensive and causes political problems. Therefore, oil is bad. Furthermore, Heckeroth states that oil has volatile pricing on the commodities market, and can cause financial instability. For those reasons, oil is bad.
Heckeroth then uses a series of logical statements to show why existing alternative energy sources are less attractive than solar power. The author discusses biomass and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. He does not address wind turbine generators. First, Heckeroth…
