Stephen Douglas And Kansas Nebraska Act Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
643
Cite

Stephen Douglas And The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Democracy is often something Americans take for granted. Living in a free, democratic society is something that is often not thought about until something happens to rock our pillar of security. The definition of democracy as a practical form of government was questioned when Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. Stephen Douglas introduced this Act.

Douglas included in his bill a provision for "popular sovereignty" in Kansas and Nebraska. This provision stated that all questions of slavery in the new territories were to be decided by the settlers rather than by Congress. This idea that the settlers - the people - would decide rather than Congress brought about much debate. Democracy is defined first and foremost as "government by the people, rule of the majority." Douglas took the position that democracy was a process bit an outcome and he argued for this process. His position - Democracy by Process - was countered by the ministers and others who maintained...

...

The problem - for lack of a better word - lies in the fact that people do not all think the same. Believe the same or follow the same moral code. Slavery was a moral issue just as much, if not more so, than a political issue. Politically it became an issue because the people themselves could not make a unified majority decision. They needed a higher entity - such as Congress - to decide for them. Many people simply needed direction or someone to tell them what to do.
The distinction between God's law and civil law soon became an issue that is still not settled. In Douglas' time there was slavery. People were bought and sold and forced to work without any regard to them as people. Today, babies are slaughtered without any respect to human life. Slavery…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Huston, James. "Democracy by Scripture vs. Democracy By Process: A Reflection on Stephen A. Douglas and Popular Sovereignty." Civil War History, Vol. XLIII. No. 3, 1997. Kent State University Press.

Political Compromises: Kansas-Nebraska Act. World Book, Inc. 2002. http://www2.worldbook.com/features/features.asp?feature=aajourney&page=html/bh037.html&direct=yes.Retrieved 17 November 2002.

Webster's Third New International Dictionary Unabridged. Merriam-Webster, Inc. 1986. Page 600.

Huston, James. "Democracy by Scripture vs. Democracy By Process: A Reflection on Stephen A. Douglas and Popular Sovereignty." Civil War History, Vol. XLIII. No. 3, 1997. Kent State University Press. Page 190.


Cite this Document:

"Stephen Douglas And Kansas Nebraska Act" (2002, November 17) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/stephen-douglas-and-kansas-nebraska-act-138995

"Stephen Douglas And Kansas Nebraska Act" 17 November 2002. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/stephen-douglas-and-kansas-nebraska-act-138995>

"Stephen Douglas And Kansas Nebraska Act", 17 November 2002, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/stephen-douglas-and-kansas-nebraska-act-138995

Related Documents

Therefore, while Lincoln gave a rather general statement concerning the matter, Lincoln offered an image common people can relate to and therefore agree upon. Thus, Lincoln's use of the human rights issue was unsuccessful in this context. Secondly, Douglas raised the issue of the states free to decide on their own whether they accepted slavery or not. Douglas, points out the fact that states have according to the constitution the

U.S. Civil War Discuss How
PAGES 5 WORDS 1611

Even "Porter Alexander, Lee's ordnance chief and one of the most perceptive contemporary observers of Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia, called his decision to stand at Antietam 'the greatest military blunder that Gen. Lee ever made'" (Owens 2004). Historians are divided as to the real purpose behind the Maryland campaign, which seems like an "isolated maneuver, another manifestation of Lee's innate aggressiveness as a commander. Some have

(Boskin, 1976) Thus the civil war and the later inclusion of the courts and rulings though have given succor to the colored people, the conditions in Virginia of the earlier century was found all over the United States even after a hundred years and hence Martin Luther King had to in the 1960s come out again to fight for equality. Is the struggle over? Conclusion On perusing the materials and analysis one

In 1837, Lincoln took highly controversial position that foreshadowed his future political path. He joined with five other legislators out of eighty-three to oppose a resolution condemning abolitionists. In 1838, he responded to the death of the Illinois abolitionist and newspaper editor, Elijah Parish Lovejoy, who was killed while defending his printing presses from a mob of pro-slavery citizens in Alton, Illinois. In a statesmanlike manner, Lincoln gave a cautious

Civil War Even When the
PAGES 4 WORDS 1743

Lee decided to run even before Sherman was able to come, and escaped from Petersburg. Grant was able to catch him at Appomattox, and then was the surrendered. There were 360,000 dead on the Union side and 260,000 dead on the Confederate side, but the union continued. This war made United States as a nation and a state. Earlier secession and state veto power had been disturbing the government

Civil War After the War
PAGES 4 WORDS 1344

California was particularly problematic. Taken from Mexico after the war, California was geographically cut in half along the 36°30, and was therefore legally and politically cut in half. However, residents applied for statehood as a free state in 1850. Congress responded with a set of complicated compromises: California would be admitted as a free state in exchange for the Fugitive Slave Law, which required that citizens residing in free