Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Walzer / Dewey / Education
Michael Walzer's position on school busing in Spheres of Justice is rather ingenious. Before we look more closely at it, though, I'd like to recall the context for his argument in favor of what used to be called "forced busing" (a derogatory term which Walzer distances himself from). The issue of using school busing to help to remedy the effects of racial segregation was the subject of two controversial Supreme Court rulings issued during the Nixon presidency: these were Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) and Milliken v. Bradley (1974). In Swann the Supreme Court found that it was constitutional to use busing for the purposes of overcoming the effects of poverty and housing inequality which led to racially homogenous populations within certain school disticts. The revisitation of the same topic in Milliken only three years later reflects the Supreme Court's establishment of a standard as to whether Swann would apply, i.e., busing of students across school district lines was only permissible if there was solid evidence of legally actionable racial segregation within all the contiguous school districts. Walzer begins his argument...
For example, he notes that
I assume a pluralist society: so long as adults associate freely, they will shape diverse communities and cultures within the larger political community. They will certainly do this in a country of immigrants, but they will do it elsewhere too. So the schools, while they respect pluralism, must also work to bring children together in ways that hold open possibilities for cooperation.(Walzer 223).
In other words, Walzer recognizes that it could be increased freedom of association (rather than institutional racism) which results in the segregated communities: he is careful to invoke America's traditional role as a refuge for immigrants in order to make the point that, even among white Americans who immigrated from elsewhere, there might have been linguistic barriers which led to the effective construction of a segregated social group. Yet Walzer emphasizes that the "cooperation" fostered by schools as part of a socially reformist agenda is his way of getting beyond voluntary segregation caused by freedom of association and pluralism. But Walzer quickly comes to defend the busing policies specifically:
This is all the more important when the pluralist pattern is involuntary and distorted. It is not necessary…
Work Cited
Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books, 1983. Print.
School Voucher System School voucher grants by the governments serve the purpose of improving educational standard of the children who belong to low-income families. This system is aimed to provide school tuition that can be paid to both public and private schools. The inspiration behind school vouchers system is to present to parents an open choice of educational institutions and approaches for their children. Another idea behind this system is to
Education Class Size vs. School Vouchers on the Achievement of Minority Students The continuous achievement gap between African-American students and their white peers is a major problem in American education. The gap in fourth-grade reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) diminished in the 1970s, but since the early 1980s it has remained unchanged. Evidence from many studies suggests that African-American students may benefit more than other students from improvement in
Education: Publically Funded Vouchers to be Used for School ChoiceIntroductionSchool vouchers are an important tool for ensuring school choice and educational equity. By providing parents with a way to send their children to the school of their choice, vouchers give families more control over their child�s education. Additionally, vouchers can help to level the playing field between public and private schools by providing students from low-income families with access to
School Choice Throughout the nation the American public has clamored for school change and reform. One of the alternatives that has moved to the forefront of the arena is the ability of parents to choose the public school that their children will attend without geographic boundaries and mandates. Experts continue to debate whether or not school choice ability will force the hand of the public school system to make the desired changes.
These issues of professionalism and innovation seem to be a major problem in many public schools in America. In recent years these issues have come to light as teachers have been disciplined and even fired for their interactions with students that have been unprofessional and even criminal at times. Teachers have an ethical responsibility to act professionally and when they fell to do so the ability of students to
The case snowballed and grew until the nation viewed Zelmanv Simmons-Harris as the test case to try the legal boundary between church and state. It was also looked to for the purpose of redefining the meaning and scope of public education in America. Enacted by the Ohio legislature in 1995, the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program allows 4,000 low-income children to attend private religious and secular schools with up to $2,250