Civil-Military Relations Civil Military Relations essay

Download this essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from essay:

However in those days, the progress was even slower and there was deeper concern about the possibility of complete transition. Samuel Huntington's path-breaking book, Political Order in Changing Societies (1968) has been by far the most well received and comprehensive book on the subject of civilian military relations. Huntington studied the conditions in Latin America and found that in underdeveloped countries, militaries were usually more powerful because society cannot access the government and hence support military's interference. Middle classes then "compel the military to oppose the government" and restore the status quo ante. Military may be powerful but Huntington felt that it was the organizational structure that can be blamed for coups but instead the social structure and thus "Military explanations do not explain military intervention," he argued.

By the end of the 1970s, even more literature appeared on the scene to explain civil military relations and to study the causes in coup in Latin America and other smaller nations. For most part of this decade, military was comfortably sitting in power and scholars began studying the reasons why this transition had taken place. Instead of focusing on the inner workings of the new regimes, scholars were more concerned with the causes of their installation. As Karen Remmer writes: "Scholars moved from the study of democratic breakdowns to the study of democratic transitions without pausing to analyze the authoritarian phase that came in between." Few comparative studies ever provided so much as a glimpse of the inner structure or workings of these regimes, focusing instead on societal factors that caused their installation.

A big mistake was made when scholars started studying the conditions at the time of the coup. This was a blunder because "the forces that shape authoritarian rule are not fixed at the time of regime emergence.." It is important to understand that coups are a result of many shifts in the society's thinking and it's not just a result of what was happening of the day the coup took place.

Military regime has never been really successful in any country. Their entrance is usually sudden and their exit is equally hasty. In countries like Pakistan, the transition and its problems can be clearly seen. In 1999, the democratically elected government of Nawaz Sharif was suddenly overthrown in one quick sweeping move by then Chief of Army staff Pervaiz Musharraf. In the eight years that followed, Musharraf's government was more involved in terrorism control than actually strengthening the roots of country's economy. Even though it was claimed that economy had gained strength, the common man continued to suffer from increasing prices and hyper inflation.

As the result of this, the public became increasingly agitated and Musharraf became a highly unpopular figure in the country. And finally resigned in 2008 under immense pressure from the newly elected government and the public. Mar'a Susana Ricci and J. Samuel Fitch are right when they say, "military government is a contradiction in terms; the armed forces cannot govern without subverting their own essence."Realizing the mistakes they have made, they try to exit hastily as not to do any more damage to the country. This cannot be said of Pakistan though where the transition has been going on and off for decades. The weaknesses of other institutions have given even greater strength to the army which is probably the best and most well organized institution in the country.

All in all, Military civilian relations are controversial and complicated. The very public that would hail the entrance of military during crisis would want to get rid of it once peace is restored. Democracy is always the more desired of the two but in underdeveloped countries, there has been an increased trend of dependency on the army during the times when democracy seems to be failing.

Glen Segell, Civil-Military Relations after the Nation-State (London: GMS, 2000), p. 1.

Samuel Finer, the Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics, 2nd Edition, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1976, p. 4. 3rd Edition, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988.

Sun Tzu (Thomas Cleary trans.), the Art of War, Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications, 1998, p. 78.

Niccolo Machiavelli (W.K. Marriott trans.), the Prince, London: E.P. Dutton and Co., 1920, p. 97.

Carl von Clausewitz, on War, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1968, p. 402.

Finer, the Man on Horseback, pp. 22-23.

Alfred Stepan, Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Publishers, 1988, p. 3.

Stepan, p. 3

McAlister, "Recent Research and Writings on the Role of the Military in Latin America," 5.

Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 213, 194.

Remmer, Military Rule in Latin America, 24.


Cite This Essay:

"Civil-Military Relations Civil Military Relations" (2008, August 22) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from

"Civil-Military Relations Civil Military Relations" 22 August 2008. Web.6 December. 2016. <>

"Civil-Military Relations Civil Military Relations", 22 August 2008, Accessed.6 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Military Employee Stress the Objective

    The subjects were 613 injured Army personnel Military Deployment Services TF Report 13 admitted to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from March 2003 to September 2004 who were capable of completing the screening battery. Soldiers were assessed at approximately one month after injury and were reassessed at four and seven months either by telephone interview or upon return to the hospital for outpatient treatment. Two hundred and forty-three soldiers

  • Civil Liberties During War Losses

    However, during war it becomes all too easy to look for convenient ways to disregard even the most important laws. The first, and most dramatic, effect of war is to increase the general fearfulness of a population. Fear and anxiety rocket way up during wartime, and are fueled by all the myriad effects of such conflicts. But another, less-well-understood reaction to war on the part of a both the individual

  • Civil War Marked a Pivotal

    Robert E. Lee was also an important general responsible for commanding the Northern Virginia regiment of the confederate army. Lee was interesting in that even though he was a confederate commander he was believed be against slavery. Lincoln's beliefs about America are forever engrained on the national psyche. Speeches such as the Gettysburg Address are still quoted and reflects the intent of the founding fathers. The Gettysburg Address states, "Four

  • Civil War the American Civil

    Page updated June 1, 2002. April 23, 2009. Leidner, Gordon. "Causes of the Civil War: A Balanced Answer." Great American History. April 23, 2009. Litwak, Leon. "Results of the Civil War." Funk & Wagnalls® New Encyclopedia. 2005 World Almanac Education Group. April 23, 2009. "The Secession Crisis: Bleeding Kansas." The Civil War. April 23, 2009. "The Secession Crisis: Dred Scott." The Civil War. April 23, 2009. "The Secession Crisis: The Missouri Compromise." The Civil War.

  • International Relations the Yugoslavian Civil

    Because of the army's status as Serbs, however, it aided only the rebels, leaving the Croats to fend for themselves. But the conflict did not stay within the boarders of Croatia. Instead, it pushed past the boundaries of Bosnia Herzegovina and led to one of the most bitter and bloodiest battles of the war, which included the Serbs and Yugoslavian People's Army fighting against the Croats and Muslims of Bosnia.

  • Military Imparts in an Individual Many Important

    military imparts in an individual many important qualities that they carry out into the real world. These qualities are leadership, versatility, character, among others. The military is an excellent place to learn, to grow, and to better one's self. Many people have had long and successful careers that they earned only through being in the military. It teaches a person the importance of hard work, communication, and bravery. The military

  • Civil Rights During the Cold

    By the late 1970s, the Cold War had wound down, and the Soviets posed less of a threat than they had over the past three decades. Many civil rights for blacks, women, and minorities in America had been won during the Cold War. Many other hard fights were still to come, but ultimately, the Cold War marked the height of American fear of aggression, and American gains in civil

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved