Corporate Manslaughter Bill Research Organisation Term Paper

Draft Corporate Manslaughter Bill

Important as the corporate manslaughter bill is to many people, it seems to receive much more talk than action. In 2005, Prime Minister Tony Blair promised to make the corporate manslaughter bill a priority, and that they would ensure it reached the statute books by 2007. The bill itself provides some of the parts need to make the overall concept of corporate manslaughter work, such as providing definition to certain corporate figure, like who is a Chairman, Managing Director, Chief Executive or Secretary of the Company. The Bill makes possible prosecution of an officer of the corporation, who might be found guilty of corporate killing, by default, if the corporation as an entity is found liable.

The theory is that by way of imposing penalties and jail terms on corporations and their people at the top, then that will cause the corporations to be more focused on and intent upon keeping its employees and civilian population safe and from harm's way. It relies on the presumption that corporations will develop a social conscience above and beyond the profit margins.

The Home Office presents the draft Bill on Corporate Manslaughter in this way:

CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER and CORPORATE HOMICIDE: A REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT of the GOVERNMENT'S BILL

INTRODUCTION

1. This assessment considers the impact of proposals set out in the Government's Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.

2. The proposals are intended to offer a more effective means of holding organisations to account for gross management failings causing death than is currently provided under the law of manslaughter in England and Wales and Northern Ireland and culpable homicide in Scotland1. In practice, it can prove very difficult to prosecute large corporations for gross negligence manslaughter/culpable homicide because the law requires proof that a "directing mind" (that is, an individual at the very top of the organisation who can be said to embody its decisions or actions) is guilty of the offence. In broad terms, the proposals would create a variant of this offence specific to organisations. Criminal liability would be attributed where the way the organisation's activities were managed or organised by its senior managers was grossly in breach of a duty of care it owed a person, causing their death.

3. The primary purpose of reform therefore is to offer a more effective sanction against organisations for whom the current law has little effective application. The new offence does not increase or decrease individual responsibility but instead provides a different basis for the criminal liability of organisations, where the focus is no longer on the guilt of a particular individual.

4. However, a consequence of reform should be a contribution to reducing the rate of work-related deaths and injuries. The proposals do not require any new standards to be met. But a more effective corporate manslaughter offence would provide an incentive for organisations where serious failings exist in the management of health and safety risks to review current arrangements and organise themselves in a way that minimises failings that might cause death. While existing health and safety legislation already provides for an unlimited fine on conviction for certain offences, the prospect of a manslaughter conviction under more effective legislation will provide an additional incentive to comply with appropriate standards.

5. This assessment sets out the background to the Bill, the options for reform and the likely costs and benefits to potential defendants, enforcing authorities and society as a whole, in the context of improving health and safety in the workplace.

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill introduces a new offence of corporate manslaughter (for England and Wales and Northern Ireland) and a new offence of corporate homicide (for Scotland). For the remainder of this assessment, the term "corporate manslaughter" should be read to include corporate homicide.

1.4 RESEARCH FRAMEWORK

1.4.1 Hypothesis

The hypothesis posited here is that the existing definition and application of the laws of negligence and manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter are deficient in definition, application and penalty as to be applied...

...

This paper will provide a thorough and comprehensive discussion of those laws and look at specific case studies which have been subjected to the laws, but, if a distinct and separate "corporate manslaughter" law existed, would take those cases of the current application of law and put them into this distinct and separate law.
A second objective of this research study is to examine the applicable penalties of domestic law in findings of manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter. To compare and contrast non-industry related cases findings of manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter with cases in which the findings were findings of manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter but the perpetrator of the offence is not an individual but a corporate entity, business, or individual acting in behalf of a corporate entity or business.

A third objective of this research study is to examine and consider and discuss the creation of corporate manslaughter laws within a legal framework; if in fact it becomes evident through this research study that distinct and separate corporate manslaughter laws and penalties should be created.

A fourth objective of this research study to examine and consider the existing laws and regulations that would be applicable in corporate settings, but not in domestic settings, and how, given those differences in settings, the same laws of manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter are applied to findings of negligence. In other words, the industry related laws and regulations intended to keep employees and consumers safe, that do not exist in the domestic setting or setting outside of the workplace.

A final objective of this research study is to consider the benefits, if any, that society would derive from enacting separate and distinct corporate manslaughter laws and penalties. In other words, based on the findings of this research study, would the formation of such law and penalties work to negate the instances of corporate manslaughter as reflected by a reduction in the related statistics. This objective will be subject to further research and study to determine if in fact that outcome is achieved - and subject to the creation of distinct and separate corporate manslaughter laws and penalties.

1.4.4 Research Methods

The method employed in this research study is one of examining and considering and discussion of existing data and information on the topic of corporate manslaughter. The method employed involves a diverse range of sources in order to provide a broad range of legal expertise and opinion. Also, the method employed as one of desk study research draws on the quantitative and qualitative study data of other professionals and experts on the subject of corporate manslaughter. This research study method employs the use of specific case studies related to the topic.

1.4.5 Assumptions and Limitations

The limitations of the study fall within the qualitative and quantitative categories, because to the extent that quantitative or qualitative statistics are given, there is a reliance on the professional expertise of the source of those statistics. No independent gathering of statistical data or calculation of statistical data was performed by this researcher. To this extent, the statistical data as presented in this study must be noted as a limitation of this research study.

This study relies upon the professional expertise of prior researchers in the interpretation of some legalese. To this extent, the study is limited by the reliance upon the body of professional expertise in those interpretations.

Research Organization

Chapter 1 of the dissertation serves to introduce the study within the framework of the topic as described above. The research question is put forth, identifying the objectives of the study, and introducing the core concerns, stating the problems it will be addressing through the research. The introductory chapter sets out the thesis, around which the study will revolve.

Chapter 1 also presents the Corporate Manslaughter Bill Draft as it appears on the Home Office web site, which tracks all news and progress in moving the Bill along through the Parliamentary stages that can take it to the statutes - as Prime Minister Tony Blair promised the public he would see happen.

Chapter 2 is an examination of the professional literature and the legislation as it pertains to the topic of corporate manslaughter. It takes the discussion of the material to its broadest…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Allen, Michael J. 2005 Textbook on Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001387647

Bergman, David. "Bosses Get Away with Murder." New Statesman 6 Nov. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001387647.

A www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001839580

Bergman, David. "Tighten Up Our Health and Safety Law." New Statesman 25 Oct. 1999: 21. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001839580.
Bosses Accused of Manslaughter; Six Face Court over Rail Disaster Deaths." Daily Post (Liverpool, England) 10 July 2003: 4. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009734717.
Duff, R.A. Criminal Attempts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=30433448.
Fox, Mark. Through the Valley of the Shadow of Death: Religion, Spirituality, and the Near-Death Experience. London: Routledge, 2002. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=108421490.
Fury over Hatfield Rail Crash Verdicts." Daily Post (Liverpool, England) 7 Sept. 2005: 11. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5010907916.
Geldart, William. Introduction to English Law: (Originally Elements of English Law). 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=59452396.
Haines, Fiona. Corporate Regulation: Beyond 'Punish or Persuade'. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=9848669.
HATFIELD COVER-UP; EXCLUSIVE as Five Network Rail Bosses Walk Free over This Terrible Crash, We Reveal How the Firm GAGGED the Mirror as We Were about to EXPOSE an Astonishing 354 Track Defects." The Mirror (London, England) 7 Sept. 2005: 4. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5010905894.
Home Office. Tough New Laws on Corporate Manslaughter. 2005. Available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/pageprint.asp?item_id=1278Accessed 2/04/07.
Home Office. Reforming the Law of Involuntary Manslaughter: The Governments Proposals London: HMSO, 2000. Available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/consult/invmans.htm. Accessed 1/04/07.
Johnes, Martin, and Iain Mclean. "Echoes of Injustice." History Today Dec. 2000: 28. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001145954.
Kampfner, John, and Peter Wilby. "Power for a Purpose: As Tony Blair Heads for a Third Election Campaign as Labour Party Leader, John Kampfner and Peter Wilby, in a Comradely Spirit, Offer Him a Draft Manifesto, Power for a Purpose, Designed to Transform Him into a Proper Social Democrat While Keeping His Party in Office." New Statesman 1 Jan. 2005: 38+. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009403919.
Khanna, V.S. "Corporate Liability Standards: When Should Corporations Be Held Criminally Liable?." American Criminal Law Review 37.4 (2000): 1239. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001190245.
The Leopards of Labour Pounce on Big Business." The Mail on Sunday (London, England) 1 Oct. 2006: 4. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5017303834.
Mackenzie, Simon. "Systematic Crimes of the Powerful: Criminal Aspects of the Global Economy." Social Justice 33.1 (2006): 162+. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5017884613.
Manslaughter Charges Thrown out after [Pounds Sterling]10m Hatfield Disaster Trial." The Daily Mail (London, England) 15 July 2005: 35. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009877301.
Massey, Ray. "Hatfield: Eight Face Manslaughter Case; Railtrack and Maintenance Firm Chiefs to Be Charged." The Daily Mail (London, England) 4 July 2003: 15. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009734622.
Mclean, Iain, and Martin Johnes. Aberfan: Government and Disasters / . Cardiff, Wales: Welsh Academic Press, 2000. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=102280930.
Murray, Louis, and Brenda Lawrence. Practitioner-Based Enquiry: Principles for Postgraduate Research. London: Falmer Press, 2000. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=103352237.
Network Rail Guilty over Hatfield Case." The Birmingham Post (England) 7 Sept. 2005: 6. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5010906923.
OUR CHANCE for JUSTICE; Hatfield Families Welcome Manslaughter Charges against Rail Firms and Six Bosses." The Mirror (London, England) 10 July 2003: 11. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009734711.
Thomas, Mark. "Company Directors Whose Employees Die on the Job Because of Their Negligence Should Be Jailed: The Prospect of Sharing a Cell with Jeffrey Archer Should Be Deterrent Enough." New Statesman 2 June 2003: 10. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001944536.
Tonry, Michael. "The Functions of Sentencing and Sentencing Reform." Stanford Law Review 58.1 (2005): 37+. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5011529207.
Ward, Amanda. "I Wish We Had All Died That Terrible Night; ZEEBRUGGE 10 YEARS on: THE FORGOTTEN VICTIMS." The Mirror (London, England) 6 Mar. 1997: 20. Questia. 12 Apr. 2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5003748209.
Queen Elizabeth, (2005), Transcript of Queen's Speech 17 May 2005,' found online at http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page7488.asp, retrieved 8 April 2007.


Cite this Document:

"Corporate Manslaughter Bill Research Organisation" (2007, April 12) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corporate-manslaughter-bill-research-organisation-38637

"Corporate Manslaughter Bill Research Organisation" 12 April 2007. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corporate-manslaughter-bill-research-organisation-38637>

"Corporate Manslaughter Bill Research Organisation", 12 April 2007, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corporate-manslaughter-bill-research-organisation-38637

Related Documents

Benchmarking Opportunities and Challenges of benchmarking The first question to be asked is what benchmarking can do for any organization. The process of benchmarking permits the entire organization to identify, share and use the knowledge that exists within the organization as also the best practices prevalent within the organization. The attempt is to concentrate on improving the situation of any business unit and not to just measure the best performances that have