Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Things They Carried is known as the novel and also as a book containing stories which are interrelated to each other. Written by Tim O'Brien, the book is considered to be a book representing complex ideas and perspectives hence presenting a complex variety of literary cultures. The writer puts forward in front of his readers a very interesting memoir in front of his readers and at the same time also presents writers biography wrapped in one. He makes the reading experience interesting by creating a fictional hero who adopts the writers name and narrates the story. To completely understand and appreciate this literary masterpiece it is important to understand that even though the events in the book might be true but it still stands as an aspiration hence it is a pure work of fiction rather than a non-fictional, historic account of events.
The hero or the story narrator in the book is "Tim O'Brien" who happens to be a Vietnam war veteran and an aspiring middle ages writer. The most constant theme of the story is that O'Brien tries to remember and re create the events that took place in the past especially his time in the army and his service in the Vietnamese war. During this process he also tries to make sense of these memories and asks many important questions regarding them (Calloway, 1995).
He accomplishes this through a completely fascinating series of auto-biographies series of stories which are semi-linked with each other, in these stories "O'Brien" tries to put light on the characters he served with in the war. He describes the men individually for instance he describes this one Lt. Jimmy Cross who is ill experienced not fully equipped and is made the leader of the Alpha Company. Years after the war, the two spent an afternoon together remembering their friends and those who were killed (Herzog, 1992).
At the beginning of the book, Jimmy Cross is shown as a lieutenant who is distracted because of his attraction to a girl back home while he is at war in Vietnam, it gets worse enough for it to cloud his leadership skills with his men. Its gets bad enough for him to allow his men to smoke, drugs, drop important things during long marches and make jokes at each others expenses in very carefree manner. His irresponsible attitude towards the war and his men comes to a halt when one of his close men Ted Lavender is shot dead during a cross fire (Bonn 1994).
Cross's Reaction to Lavender's Death
When Ted is shot dead, cross acts the way he realizes is the right manner and takes his felloe man's death's responsibility upon himself. He does so because he is the lead commander of his unit and takes full responsibility of his death. When Lavender dies Jimmy falls apart and is emotionally overwhelmed.
He tried not to cry. With his entrenching tool, which weighed five pounds, he began digging a hole in the earth.
He felt shame. He hated himself. He had loved Martha more than his men, and as a consequence Lavender was now dead, and this was something he would have to carry like a stone in his stomach for the rest of the war.
All he could do was dig. He used his entrenching tool like an ax, slashing, feeling both love and hate, and then later, when it was full dark, he sat at the bottom of his foxhole and wept. (O'Brien 16-17)
In the story Jimmy Cross's character is a typical one who cannot handle responsibility and what unique effects being in a responsible position has on people who are immature with their work and that which is trusted on them. The only reason he joined the officers training corps was being he had nothing else better to do with his life and also because his friends were doing it as well. Since in actual he doesn't really care about the war and does not want to be in a leading position. Hence when he is given the responsibility to lead several men on the fire front of the war he is unsure of how to deal with the responsibility and is not sure what exactly his job his (Bates, 1987).
Cross's guilt is apparent every time one of his men dies in cross fire but it is most obvious in the case of his close friend Ted Lavender. He blames himself to be responsible for his ted since according to him most of the time he was preoccupied with his attraction to Martha who always sends him photographs of how stuff is back home and writes letters which do not mention the war to him. His day dreaming comes to an end when his fellow men starts to get killed in cross fires especially when Ted dies, he comes to the conclusion that he prefers someone who is not even close to him over his own men. The fact that we see later in the book that cross confesses to O'Brien years later about his guilt still lingering over Lavenders death proves how deeply moved he was with the loss. In the book we can also see Jimmy Cross as a Christ figure, this is apparent from his inexplicable atrocity; certain individuals assume the position of a group's or their own savior. Such men suffer so that others don't have to bear the brunt of the guilt and confusion. In a very strange way Cross is not only linked with Christ in a theoretical manner as in they both share the same initials and also the idea of cross, but also it is obvious from the nature of their roles, just like Christ suffered the pain for his men, Cross also suffered the guilt and pain for his units men who were being shot (Harris, 1990).
The character analysis for Lt. Cross involves both realistic or practical elements as well as theoretical ones. In the book we see him functioning as a complete symbol of war, especially in the context of meaningful foundations. Just like in warfare Cross is also described as a character with a lack of distinct rationale. In theory Lt. Cross as the leader of the Alpha unit should be that of a head strong leader who should be motivated and focused enough to provide his troops with strong and clear commands on how to gain advantage over the enemy. However in case of the Vietnam war it becomes impossible for Cross to gain that kind of leadership for his unit because the object or the end result of the war itself is confusing and not thoroughly defines. Similar to battles and operations that constituted the war; Cross fails to demonstrate the clear ability to fulfill his role (Coffey, 1990).
Cross is portrayed as a weak leader because the traditional training he had received is contrast with what he experiences in the war. His training taught him all about the stuff which went that high on priorities when it came to war tactics for instance, marching in line, reading a map, keeping the guns clean, his training also included following the already decided procedures and the basic operating system which was standard, however the situation in Vietnam demanded a more on the spot thinking plan with more focus on gaining grounds with the enemy rather than marching in lines and keeping ones guns clean. In theory he was the leader of the Alpha Company but in practical implementation was never a true member of it, his tactic if separating himself from his men so that his authority could be established never worked. He is shown in a constant battle with himself where he knows that he is the leader of his…[continue]
"Things They Carried Is Known As The" (2011, September 10) Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/things-they-carried-is-known-as-the-52044
"Things They Carried Is Known As The" 10 September 2011. Web.22 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/things-they-carried-is-known-as-the-52044>
"Things They Carried Is Known As The", 10 September 2011, Accessed.22 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/things-they-carried-is-known-as-the-52044
The audience has the feeling that O'Brian is presenting them with significant and personal stories from his life. This slowly but surely makes readers feel that they too are connected to the war and to the narrator. It sometimes seems that O'Brian also addresses present day issues in the book, not just happenings from the war. The bond between him and the audience is strengthened through this technique because people
" (O'Brien, Chapter 15, pg. 143) Norman Bowker is a disillusioned person because he feels that his service in the war has been meaningless. The quote speaks a lot about what he feels about the people of his town. He has just returned from his tour of duty in Vietnam where he witnessed a lot of bloodshed and violence, which has left deep wounds in his soul. Bowker has gone through
Things They Carried and in the Field The novel The Things They Carried, by Tim O'Brien, is an episodic account of Alpha Company, a platoon of American soldiers and their experiences during the Vietnam conflict. We will focus on two chapters of the book, "The Things They Carried," and "In the Field." These are the only chapters in the book that are told from an omniscient point-of-view. Both of these
It is very difficult to reach a conclusion regarding "The Things They Carried" and the purpose for which O'Brien wrote it. While a first look on the collection of books is probable to provide someone with the feeling that it is easy to read and does not involve a lot of strong feelings, the truth is that this is what the writer intended it to look like. Not only is
1). The character in the novel/author 'Tim' never believed in the cause of the Vietnam War, and nearly fled to Canada to avoid serving. That decision to servie affected him in an unalterable fashion, and O'Brien's recounts the story of Vietnam to himself, in both truthful and fanciful ways, to make sense of his experience. Yet every re-telling removes him farther and farther away from the realities of the experience,
Mary Anne becomes obsessed with the war in a strange way. It is as if she sees another kind of life that is so radically different than her own that it consumes her. She seems to be so sweet and innocent at the beginning of the story and at the end she is like an animal that She adopt the Green Beret way of life and becomes one of
O'Brien illustrates the wide array of emotions experienced during war with "Ambush" and "The Man I Killed." Emotions and perspectives of war and death change with exposure to war and death. In "Ambush," war and death seem casual as the speaker tells us how the sees the young man walking and pills the pin on the grenade because he was afraid. He writes, "I did not hate the young man: