Research Paper Doctorate 1,080 words

Legalization of marijuana: arguments and implications

Last reviewed: March 22, 2004 ~6 min read

¶ … marijuana should be legalized only for medicinal purposes.

The debate over medicinal marijuana usage and legality is a controversial one. Many experts argue the drug costs society too much money in terms of law enforcement and incarceration costs when the monies could be better spent in other law enforcement areas. A large majority of the American people does believe marijuana should be decriminalized for medical usage. In 2001, 34% of adult Americans believed marijuana should be legal, at least in small amounts, the largest percentage since 1969, and up to 70% of adults approved of using medicinal marijuana for certain ailments (Cauchon 01A). However, several questions regarding medicinal marijuana usage that must be addressed.

First, is marijuana a safe and effective medicine? Proponents maintain marijuana has been used medicinally for thousands of years and for a variety of uses. They claim that it is safe, no one has ever "died of an overdose," and that it is safe, effective, and helpful in a variety of serious ailments, from multiple sclerosis to cancer and AIDS. In fact, even the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) chief administrative law judge maintains the DEA should decriminalize marijuana partly because of its medicinal benefits ("Briefing Paper"). Clearly, a variety of experts agrees that marijuana has numerous medicinal benefits, and can help a wide variety of patients.

Second, are other drugs available that are as effective? While there may be other drugs available that can aid in some of the medicinal uses marijuana is currently used for, marijuana seems to have more medical uses than many other drugs. Some studies have shown that marijuana is more effective in treating some cancer patients because they cannot tolerate the cancer drugs available, while they are able to tolerate marijuana. One doctor notes,

It's true that other drugs are available for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, but he and other advocates contend that some patients can't take those drugs -- or any drug, including Marinol, that must be swallowed. In such cases, unrelenting vomiting may lead patients to drop out of a potentially lifesaving chemotherapy regimen (Fackelmann).

Therefore, there may be other drugs capable of treating the debilitating affects of illnesses such as cancer, but many of these drugs have harsh symptoms of their own, and many patients find they get more relief from marijuana, and can tolerate its affects much more easily.

Third, should the FDA approval process be circumvented with legislation? Having the FDA approve medicinal marijuana is simply another stepping stone in the process, and it should be circumvented with legislation because there have already been numerous studies as to the benefits of medical marijuana that can be used to illustrate the importance of legalization. Patients who use marijuana medicinally show improvement over those who do not in many areas, and these studies, along with studies on the long-term usage of the drug in other areas where it is legal, such as the Netherlands, point to success in managing marijuana and its affects. One doctor writes, "Thousands of patients with cancer, AIDS, and other diseases report they have obtained striking relief from these devastating symptoms by smoking marijuana. The alleviation of distress can be so striking that some patients and their families have been willing to risk a jail term to obtain or grow the marijuana'" (Fackelmann). Thus, the FDA should use available studies, and allow the question of medicinal marijuana to be decided through legislation that would affect the entire nation, rather than leaving it to a few states to ratify or deny.

Would legalization send the wrong message to children? This is probably the most difficult argument to analyze, because it is so controversial. Children in our society today already use marijuana in record numbers, and so "sending the wrong message" may already be far too late. Marijuana is not perceived as a dangerous drug in much of the nation, and the worst symptoms from marijuana may be smoking it, it is much more dangerous than smoking cigarettes, especially on young lungs. Marijuana would not be legal for juveniles, it would only be legal for medicinal purposes, and this is not sending the wrong message to our children, it is sending a message that we are compassionate and caring for our diseased and our ill, and we want them to have the best care and medicines available to them.

You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2004). Legalization of marijuana: arguments and implications. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/legalization-of-marijuana-166497

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.