Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Prisoners with Ties to Terrorism
Describe and Explain the unique challenges associated with the increase in prisoners with ties to terrorism and other extremist groups. Develop a plausible approach that prison administrators could implement in tackling some of the most significant challenges.
One of the challenges associated with the increase in prisoners with ties to terrorism and other extremist groups is the problem of preventing terrorist recruitment in correctional institutions (Hamm, 2007). Another challenge is that prisons can often be where inmates are first introduced to radicalization (Siegel et al., 2019). However, as Jones (2014) notes, it is not necessarily a given outcome that terrorist prisoners will recruit or radicalize others; in fact, a lot of it depends on the type of programs the prison has available. An additional concern is the culture of the prison and whether or not it is giving inmates the dignity they require in order to have a sense of fairness and justice (Burdett et al., 2018). This paper will explain the unique challenges associated with the increase in prisoners with ties to terrorism and extremism, and what a plausible approach for prison administrators could be in addressing these challenges.
The rise in prisoners with ties to terrorism or extremism is due to the fact that terror networks have grown as a criminal group around the world, and this has resulted in more inmates with terror ties. This means that in the closely cramped quarters of prisons today, there are more radical elements that can more easily spread their message of extremism, hate, violence, or radicalization. Yet, depending on the type of environment in which the terrorist inmate dwells, the likelihood of success in spreading extremism may be great or little (Jones, 2014). That is because the environment, the inmate culture, the extent to which a moral code exists among inmates, the nature of the prison regime, social obstacles, religious beliefs, and the basic needs of the inmates (and whether they are being met) will all play a part in determining the extent to which a message of terror can be spread (Jones, 2014). The fact is that many elements prime a person for radicalization: it is not simply exposure to the ideology of a terrorist that turns one into a radical; rather, there is a groundwork that is first prepared by years of neglect, prior beliefs or convictions about society or religion, whether the individual has any morality (and what type of morality it is), and so on. These factors will play a part in the decision to embrace terrorism....…the prison and that inmates are given opportunities to appeal decisions or discuss issues with a committee or review board. The goal of this approach is to give voice and the power of self-representation to inmates; this way they are not left wallowing in anger or frustration at their situation or condition. They can take issues to a board or committee and expect that they will be respected and heard. This can give them a sense of justice, and if this sense prevails they will see extremism as a violent alternative that is unattractive and irresponsible in their eyes.
The goal of the prison administration should be to help inmates rehabilitate and restore their sense of justice and belonging to the wider community. Since terrorism and extremism build on fear, anger, and resentment, inmates need to be helped to feel more positive, respected, and upright. Terror and extremism promote ideologies that serve people who feel powerless and who accept that the only way to gain power is through violence. Administrators should therefore realize that by empowering their inmates, they give them the means to rise above the virus of extremism and terrorism: they give them a sense of self-worth and belonging (especially through restorative justice programs) that can build a culture of mindfulness and…
References
Burdett, F., Gouliquer, L., & Poulin, C. (2018). Culture of corrections: Theexperiences of women correctional officers. Feminist Criminology, 13(3), 329-349.
Hamm, M. S. (2007). Terrorist Recruitment in American Correctional Institutions: AnExploratory Study of Non-traditional Faith Groups; Final Report (pp. 1-128). Indiana State University, Department of Criminology.
Jones, C. R. (2014). Are prisons really schools for terrorism? Challenging the rhetoric onprison radicalization. Punishment & Society, 16(1), 74-103.
Siegel, A., Brickman, S., Goldberg, Z., & Pat-Horenczyk, R. (2019). Preventing futureterrorism: Intervening on youth radicalization. An International Perspective on Disasters and Children's Mental Health, 391-418.
Restorative Justice: With the research conducted between the years 1997 and 1998 in the United States and Europe shows that the rate of crime was high and the culprits were never given any chance to defend themselves whenever they appeared before the court of law. This made the courts to be full and the prisons to be overcrowded as criminals saw that there was no justice in their rulings. It is
Restorative Justice Individual restorative justice paper: Case study Traditionally, the debate about the purpose of the justice system has revolved around the question of whether punishment should be retributive or rehabilitative in nature. Those who favor a retributive model stress the need for criminals to pay their debts to society and view the purpose of the justice system as primarily to punish convicts through confinement and forcing them to work. Those who
Variations of the area court model, such as teen courts, medicine courts, and household physical violence courts, focus on specific concerns in order to establish even more extensive options. The underlying presumption of neighborhood courts is that neighborhoods are deeply damaged by the sentencing procedure yet are seldom spoken with and associated with judicial results. Correcting Community justice has actually been slowest to show up in the correctional industry. Maybe this
According to Richards (2004), however, the history of restorative justice outside of the specifically named restorative justice procedures that are littered throughout U.S. criminal justice history is difficult to determine. Although she cites work that suggests restorative justice has been around since the dawn of time, she argues that some histories are used as a means to convince others of the importance of restorative justice and, therefore, often exaggerate
However the law demands that the course of action should be experimented, and evaluated on the grounds that if they are reasonable, restorative, and respectful. The offenders should comply by the standards of safety, values, ethics, responsibility, accountability and civility. The offenders should be exposed to the same nature of crime experienced by the victims, and should be provided with the chance of learning empathy. Such an offender should
Restorative justice is a forward-looking, preventive response that strives to understand crime in its social context (Maiese, 2003). It examines the root causes of violence and crime to break these cycles of crime. This approach is based on the assumption that crime has its origins in social conditions, and recognizes that offenders themselves have often suffered harm. Therefore, offenders can tell their story of why the crime occurred and, just