Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
When the Cherokees exercise the same common sense and claim the same rights of whites on their own territory, this is seen as radical and out of order. To further quote the Committee's work, they remark that "No respectable jurist has ever gravely contended, that the right of the Indians to hold their reserved lands, could be supported in the courts of the country, upon any other ground than the grant or permission of the sovereignty or State in which such lands lie (Erbach, "The Cherokee Removal Group C. Readings")." In other words, like slavery, oppression of the Native Americans is acceptable when done by the state governments and the U.S. government can do nothing to interfere. Such reasoning would haunt the country later as it went into the Civil War.
In the response of the Cherokees, they freely admit that they have fought against the American Republic before on behalf of Great Britain, but did that because they were the most powerful force on the continent. Had they opposed Britain, they would have been crushed earlier. Then they made peace with America and entered into honorable treaties. They perceive only ruin if they leave the land of their fathers. They ask as a small nation to large and strong nation to have mercy on the small and poor and weak in the form of the Cherokee nation. They observe and point to the fate of the Native American tribes that have already been wiped out and ask if they, a remnant will also...
They also note they are now being treated like tenants on land that belongs to Federal government to be expelled at will, even thought the Supreme Court has recognized their rights. The President will not honor the treaty obligations that the United States took upon itself and has amended time and again in treaty after treaty. They appeal to the Christian good will of the United States not to stop the progress of culture and Christianity within the Cherokee nation (Erbach, "The Cherokee Removal Group D. Readings)." Unfortunately, even assimilation will not bring them respite from the Trail of Tears.
To recap, the Cherokees found themselves in the classic double bind. The schizophrenic policy of the Federal government symbolizes the problems that the young nation had with its guilty conscience and the call of empire.
Bibliography
"Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal." http://www.teachushistory.org/indian-removal/approaches/andrew-jackson-indian-removal (accessed 31 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group a Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group B. Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group C. Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group D. Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
"Historical Documents: The Trail of Tears."
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h1567.html (accessed 31
March 2011).
Bibliography
"Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal." http://www.teachushistory.org/indian-removal/approaches/andrew-jackson-indian-removal (accessed 31 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group a Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
Erbach, Jennifer. "The Cherokee Removal Group B. Readings."
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
2002. http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/teachers/lesson5-groupa.html (accessed 30 March 2011).
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h1567.html (accessed 31
In 1837, Lincoln took highly controversial position that foreshadowed his future political path. He joined with five other legislators out of eighty-three to oppose a resolution condemning abolitionists. In 1838, he responded to the death of the Illinois abolitionist and newspaper editor, Elijah Parish Lovejoy, who was killed while defending his printing presses from a mob of pro-slavery citizens in Alton, Illinois. In a statesmanlike manner, Lincoln gave a cautious
President Andrew Jackson built his political and military career on an aggressive approach to Native Americans. His exploits began well before 1838-9, when his Indian Removal Act signaled the deplorable state of affairs in North America. Around 4000 Cherokee died during the forcible removal program dubbed aptly the "Trail of Tears," as many more Indians were displaced and deprived of rights that had been previously been guaranteed by federal law.
S. government chose not only to ignore the great humanitarian tragedy but even refused to condemn the killing. The American inaction on the Rwandan genocide places a big question mark on any subsequent action of its government overseas for humanitarian reasons. Besides being accused of using "humanitarianism" as a smokescreen for pursuing its own narrow national interests, the United States is also accused of undermining the United Nations and International Law
Segregation, denial of voting rights, and systemic terrorization were part of the everyday life of many African-Americans. Following the Civil Rights Movement, African-Americans had the same legal rights as other Americans. The years following the Civil Rights Movement have seen those legal rights bloom into actual rights. In approximately 50 years, the United States has gone from a country that was sharply divided along racial lines, to a country
Removal Act of May 28, 1830 was an act by both Houses of Congress of the U.S., which provided for an exchange of lands with the native Indian tribes residing in any of the states or territories and for their removal west of the Mississippi River, their traditional land, to the prairies. It was signed by then President Andrew Jackson into law. The eviction of these Indian tribes from a
but, those same laws were immediately enacted by the Federal government and from that origin, became immediately binding - the Cherokee would be held to be covered by Federal but not state law. Those members of Congress who supported the removal policies became instrumental in the build-up toward the Trail of Tears. American aggressive expansionism was what drove the forced removal from their land. Whites had expanded to the edges