Comparison And Contrast Of Two Politicians Term Paper

Bush and Kerry George W. Bush belongs to a political family as his father; Bush Senior was also the President of the United States. Bush won the presidential elections 2000 against Al Gore in a cut-to-cut competition and heavy controversy pertaining to the results of the elections. At that time he was serving a second term as Texas's Governor since 1994. Basically, Bush is a businessman and had run previously oil business with keen interest in baseball.

Comparatively, John Kerry is a Vietnam War veteran who, on his return, opposed the motive and the actions of the war vehemently. In 1982 he was elected as Massachusetts lieutenant governor and has been a senator since 1990.

Both Bush and Kerry are experienced politicians, have had a history of elections, where as Bush has an advantage of being the president of the United States. This is the experience that counts most in the strategy for campaigning for the presidential elections 2005.

With respect to education, Bush got a BA degree from Yale University and an MBA degree from Harvard Business School. Kerry also got his BA degree from Yale University while he did his JD from Boston College.

In 1972 Kerry took part Congress elections, but was defeated. After that Kerry went to earn a degree in law and practiced as a prosecutor, while in the year 1982 he was elected as a Lieutenant Governor. Afterwards, in the year 1984 Kerry won the elections of the Senate and was elected as a U.S. Senator defeating Governor Bill Weld in the year 1996 (this was a reelection of Kerry as a Senator). Kerry is a liberalist, a staunch Catholic and is the proponent of free trade in the region. In his agenda for the electoral campaigns, Kerry does support War on

...

Kerry did support the bombing over Bosnia back in the year 1999. Kerry is also a vehement opposition when it comes to war led security issues. On one matter he did not approve the amendment in the constitution that favored forbidding the burning of flag.
After Vietnam War, Kerry put a lot of efforts to stabilize the United States relationship with Vietnam during the 90's decade. Kerry has also backed certain reforms in the education policy that ended tenure and let the side admission into the profession, which was strongly opposed by the teacher unions (Kerry, 82). Furthermore, he backed federal aids for religious charities. Kerry is a strong proponent of building strong trade relations with China and has also spoken for the change in the U.S. policy to accept the human rights standards as practiced by China. Also, Kerry backed a bill to fight against AIDS in Africa amounting to a hundred million dollars.

On the personality front, it seems that Kerry is a cold aristocratic minded person. He a hardworking individual, but apparently he does not show emotions of affection and warmth to the general public, that could make him the cold blooded presidential candidate in the eyes of the masses. On the financials side, it is recorded that Kerry has spent his personal money on the campaigns that led him on the top of the charts for the presidential elections, but below Bush. He has toppled Howard Dean through this investment and has won the polls that would predict that he is a very strong candidate for the presidential elections due in the year 2005. However, one question that remains to be answered from his campaigns is whether his investments in to the elections and his agenda is well enough and satisfactory so as to compete with the agenda and the support (financials) of the President Bush. The Democrats have done good for nominating him now, when back in 2000, the Democrats nominated Al Gore instead of Kerry by voicing that it was not Kerry's call then. But, now it is surely Kerry's Call. However, he would have a tough competition from Bush and that purely depends not on the "charisma" (Frum, 24) that…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Bell, Jeffrey & Frank Cannon (February 9, 2004), Weekly Standard, Volume 009, Issue 21 http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/676rgxov.asp?pg=2

Burni, F. (2002) Ambling In To History: The Unlikely Odyssey of George W. Bush. Perennial, Pg. 42

Frum, D. (2003) The Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush. Random House, Pg. 12-45

Kerry, J. (2003) A Call to Service: My Vision For A Better America. Viking Press, pg. 82
Pilger, J. (March 4, 2004) "Bush Or Kerry? Look Closely And The Danger Is The Same," New Statesman, http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=33&ItemID=5083


Cite this Document:

"Comparison And Contrast Of Two Politicians" (2004, March 25) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-and-contrast-of-two-politicians-164249

"Comparison And Contrast Of Two Politicians" 25 March 2004. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-and-contrast-of-two-politicians-164249>

"Comparison And Contrast Of Two Politicians", 25 March 2004, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/comparison-and-contrast-of-two-politicians-164249

Related Documents

educational theory by comparing and contrasting two authors of education theory with the Montessori method of teaching. The writer explores all three ideas and discusses their similarities. The writer used four sources to complete this paper. Since the advent of the educational system there have been many changes throughout the years. As the world evolves and matures and technology advances the world discovers more things that it wants its students

As a result, economic development was redefined in terms of reduction or elimination of poverty, inequality, and unemployment within the perspective of a growing economy (Mamede & Davidsson, 2003). Research indicates that entreprenuership can be both the cause and effect of economic development in the sense of wealth distribution. Countries in which wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small fraction of the population face greater difficulties in coordinating

countries of the West and other major developed countries throughout the world are notable in many ways. Comparing and contrasting the two is just one way that very interesting topics and debates can be triggered. While many Western and other developed nations share strong commonalities, there are also very stark differences. The United States in particular is an outlier in many ways given how it does not have a

Utilitarianism and Plato Philosophy is an ancient process. Since the times of Ancient Greece and Rome, people have taken it upon themselves to question the reality of their worlds and to postulate what it is that causes people to behave the ways that they do. The philosophical theory of utilitarianism has gained popularity in recent years because of the way that it explains government and the need for laws and authority.

Comparative Politics
PAGES 2 WORDS 717

Politics Notions of Modern Democracy Is Democracy just a simple definition of 'majority rules?' In reality, it's a much more complicated concept. Democracy' is a word that is often bandied about as a world with an inherently positive meaning in the public political discourse of America as well as other Western (as well as some non-Western) nations. But what constitutes a democratic political system, much less democratic political values often varies from

Modernism, and how the literature that is considered to be Modernist literature is representative of the period. Then explain how contemporary world literature comes from Modernism Discuss three Modernists and their work. Then discuss two contemporary authors. Explain how they represent NOW (or the contemporary world which is from 1968 on.) Then discuss the differences between Modernism and contemporary literature. James Joyce, Franz Kafka, and DH Lawrence are three examples of three different