Conflict Between Native Americans and Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

In general, both sides fought using impromptu raids and very vicious and undercutting tactics. However, this was the traditional fighting method used by Native Americans during this particular era and could be understood in terms of their cultural perspective.

The fifth criteria of just warfare is that "war must be the only possible means of righting the wrong done." This particular standard is another very flexible standard for warfare. Both sides of any conflict must justify their actions as "last resort" even if other opportunities were open for negotiation. However, in this historical context it could be argued that war was inevitable. This is because population tension within the eastern border mandated that a push by the colonials west of the Ohio River was inevitable. As a result, land that was traditionally Native American would ultimately get taken away from their ownership by the colonists. This it is an unavoidable end because of population tensions and the perpetual conflict between the Indians and the colonists. This is evidenced by the slow but consistent withdraw of Native Americans from their traditional eastern borders towards the west. The Indian Nations lost battle after battle to keep their territory and although there was a hiatus of conflict before the Civil War, it is evident that the conflict would have had to happen sooner or later. This was the explicit justification used by the Shawnee tribes who eventually invaded and raided the Kentucky states in an attempt to rid the colonial presence, they believed that preemptive attacks were the only means that they could avoid total annihilation by the colonists in the near future. For the colonists this issue became rather delicate, although they did not have to expand or forcefully take away land from the Shawnee, they felt that they had rightfully earned that land in lieu of trade and bartering. As a result, although they were extremely manipulative they were in fact in many ways justified. In addition, they did so under the protectionist clause in defense of their properties which validates their actions.

History is ultimately written by the victors and the sixth criteria for just warfare are that "there must be a reasonable right to victory." The Indian Civil War was a crucial turning point for the dynamics between Native Americans and colonials. It symbolized the final attempt by the Indians to reclaim their territory and stop colonial expansion. In the wake of the conflict the Shawnee tribes were dispersed and a consolidated Indian Nation would eventually be much weaker than previous this conflict itself. Symbolically this implied that the conflict could have been curtailed had the proper combination of social and implicit barriers been in play. The reasonable right of victory standard can be applied to either side of the conflict. The Shawnees defied their allegiances with the Iroquois Confederacy in order to enter into the war on the side of the British. They staked their claim of their territorial possessions very strongly and fought almost to a standstill throughout the conflict.

The final standard for just warfare is that the "probable good must outweigh the probable evil effects of the war." This standard can be understood as the greatest good for the greatest number. The "evil" effects of war very much refers to the deaths and destruction that resulted from constant raids throughout the war. It is estimated that within the "bloody" year of 1778 more than a thousand casualties were lost by both sides of the war. The probable good for the Native Americans is the retention of their land, they would stop the advancement of the colonials beyond the Ohio River region for at least another decade thus giving them a position to fortify and develop comparable strength to the colonials. Furthermore, they wanted to protect their culture which was radically changing as a result of imports from Europe such as alcohol. For them a victory would have symbolized an escape from the grip of acculturation, an important goal for the Shawnee Indians. For the colonials and the Native Americans that fought by their side, this conflict meant the ability to prosper and spread throughout the Continent. It meant that more land could be freed up for cash crops and the population tensions would decrease among all colonials and Native Americans east of the Ohio region. It also meant that the Native Americans would become even more acculturated and enjoys much of the luxuries brought over from Europe.

In the final analysis the Indian Civil War did little for the Native Americans who staked their lives to defend their territory. Upon the defeat of the British they ceded over much of the territory of the Indians without approval or even notification to their allies. As a result, the Shawnees continued to fight a losing battle without the aid of the British supporting them. They inevitably lost the majority of their holdings and were forced onto reservations. The end results of this war and the genocides that followed are indeed horrible to comprehend and all Americans still bear the burden of the ancestral crimes committed by the government and the early founders of this nation. However, from a perspective of the motives of the war and the actual conduct of it, a definitional understanding would argue that a just war did take place. Using the seven above criteria, the conflict is deemed as morally legitimate.

Bibliography

A. Britt, Great Indian Chiefs (1938, repr. 1969)

M.F. Schmitt and D.A. Brown, Fighting Indians of the West (1948, repr. 1966)

R.H. Lowie, Indians of the Plains (1954, repr. 1963)

A.M. Josephy, the Patriot Chiefs (1961)

J.…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Conflict Between Native Americans And" (2007, May 21) Retrieved December 2, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-native-americans-and-37617

"Conflict Between Native Americans And" 21 May 2007. Web.2 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-native-americans-and-37617>

"Conflict Between Native Americans And", 21 May 2007, Accessed.2 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/conflict-between-native-americans-and-37617

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Native Americans Separate and Unequal Native American

    Native Americans: Separate and Unequal Native American Isolation Native Americans have continued to represent a marginalized ethnic minority in the United States, despite repeated efforts at assimilation. No one argues publicly anymore that Native Americans are inferior to Whites, but the taint of racism seems to remain embedded in public policy decisions concerning this demographic. Accordingly, Native Americans have attempted to insulate themselves from the influence of what can only be described

  • Conflict and Cooperation Native Americans and European

    Conflict and Cooperation: Native Americans and European Settlers in Early America The early history of the settlement of what would eventually become the United States has many competing narratives. Many people view the relationship between Native Americans and European settlers as fundamentally combative. While at times the relationship between the colonists and the Native Americans was certainly one of conflict, this period was also full of significant curiosity, education and cooperation

  • Native American and European Cultures Native American

    Native American and European Cultures Native American European Cultures It is generally thought that humans first entered the New World during the last ice age and quickly spread over what is today North and South America. When the ice age ended some 15 thousand years ago, the human population of the America's was isolated from the rest of the world. It would not be until the 15th century, when the Spanish sailed

  • Native American Nations and European

    The politics were simple. The Government and the settlers had all the power, ultimately the Natives did not, and so, the settlers and the government subjugated the Natives and forced them into treaties that only served the European settlers. Another writer notes, "In 1983 Richard White argued in the Roots of Dependency that Euro-Indian relations in various parts of North America had in common the 'attempt... By whites to

  • Native Americans Dakota and Lakota People the

    Native Americans Dakota and Lakota people The word 'Dakota' is derived from the seven council fires (Oceti Sakowin) - or in other words, the main political units for the people of Dakota. The word means "ally" also referred to as "Sioux" at times. Historically, the Sisseton, Wahpekute, Wahpeton, and Mdewakanton constituted of western Yankton and Yanktonai who were together referred to as Nakota and the Teton and Eastern Dakota. The Santee Dakota

  • Native Americans Describe What Is Known of

    Native Americans Describe what is known of the tribe's pre-Columbian history, including settlement dates and any known cultural details. Before Columbus came to the "New World," the pre-Columbian era, the Cherokee occupied an area that today is western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee and northern Georgia (Waddington 2006). The Cherokee traveled even further past these areas, however, to hunt and to trade their wares. The Cherokee had occupied this area for a good

  • Native Americans Transition From Freedom to Isolation

    Native Americans Transition From Freedom to Isolation America's history since 1865 to date is a remarkable record of various accounts of despair, hope, triumph, and tragedy. The country's history consists of some compelling transformations with one of these significant accounts being the battle between Americans and Americans in the final period of the Civil War. In its initial years, the United States was politically isolated from the rest of the world


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved