Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
raising IQ scores/Education. Question: Should the IQ cutoff for mental retardation be raised to 80? Six sources. APA.
Should the IQ Cutoff for Mental Retardation be raised to 80?
The debate regarding IQ tests continues to rage into the new millennium. Every decade has a myriad of new studies supporting or contradicting the last accepted theories and studies. There are new studies which indicate that the IQ scores in the United States has risen by 3 points per decade, "indicating that intelligence is not stable but is flexible with regards to environmental influences." However, after vast research, no one knows just exactly what is causing the rise in IQ scores. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate in regards to raising the IQ cutoff scores for the mental retardation assessment. The American Association of Mental Retardation's definition of mental retardation is "a disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills...This disability originates before age 18." However, Pennsylvania Office of Mental Retardation states "the developmental period as before the 22nd birthday for the onset of eligibility for mental retardation services and supports in accordance with the current laws and statutes." "Any condition that impairs the development of the brain before birth, during birth, or during childhood" is attributable to mental retardation. Moreover, "a person is considered to have mental retardation when his intellectual functioning level (intelligence quotient or IQ) is below 70 to 75." Causes of mental retardation range from drug use, environment, poverty, genetics, cultural deprivation, to the unknown. Ninety percent of those classified with mental retardation have IQs above 50, and in fifty to seventy-five percent of these, the cause is unknown. Those with severe mental retardation, an IQ of 50 or below, the cause originates from genetic disorders, such as Down syndrome, a chromosomal disorder, and fragile X syndrome, a single-gene disorder. "Chromosomal disorders affect about 7 out of 1000 infants. Single-gene disorders affect about 1 in 1500 births. More than 750 genetic disorders have been identified that cause mental retardation." Defining mental retardation poses numerous factors involving legal rights, education, and the placement of children. Furthermore, although the cutoff IQ scores are arbitrarily set, "they are not inconsequential."
Although, there are many factors involved regarding a child's intellect, IQ standards are the criteria that state educators use to determine placement of children. States are reimbursed for excess costs incurred for educating children with learning disabilities, however, there are limits to the number of children a state can reasonably accommodate financially. Should the IQ cutoff be raised to 80, there would be a substantial increase in the number of children who would qualify for special needs education. This would indeed place a financial hardship on many states, especially those that are already operating on skeletal budgets. Iowa has raised it IQ standard to 85, while California poses the question, "How many children do you want to qualify?" One might see this as simply tapping into state and federal money for expansion of programs that may take years to implement, if at all. Good intentions do not always lead to good results. To raise the IQ cutoffs of classified children with learning disabilities will most likely still leave many lost in the cracks of an already burdened system.
Most children are identified as mentally retarded or learning disabled by teacher referral, not by IQ scores. Even those who score on IQ test within the range of mental retardation are unlikely to be classified. "Only children referred by their general education classroom teacher for severe and persistent underachievement are likely to be identified." Moreover, quite often it is only when a child displays a behavioral problem do parents and professionals become aware of a learning disability.
Given the many variables regarding intellect, such as environment, including poverty and culture, is seems unreasonable to attach much importance to IQ tests as a measure of mental retardation. Without considering these variables, ethnic groups are singled out with substantially higher mental retardation rates. According to one study, using IQ 85 as the cutoff score, "approximately 10.9% of Caucasians and 45.6% of African-Americans would achieve tested IQs below that point...using IQ 70 as the cutoff score one finds 1.07% of Caucasians and 9.85% of African-Americans scoring below that point." Therefore, it seems that raising the IQ cutoffs…[continue]
"Raising IQ Scores Education" (2002, November 25) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/raising-iq-scores-education-139613
"Raising IQ Scores Education" 25 November 2002. Web.29 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/raising-iq-scores-education-139613>
"Raising IQ Scores Education", 25 November 2002, Accessed.29 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/raising-iq-scores-education-139613
Thus, efforts aimed at helping teachers to avoid harmful stereotyping of students often begin with activities designed to raise teachers' awareness of their unconscious biases." (1989) Cotton goes on the relate that there are specific ways in which differential expectations are communicated to students according to the work of: "Brookover, et al. (1982); Brophy (1983); Brophy and Evertson (1976); Brophy and Good (1970); Cooper and Good (1983); Cooper and
Pedagogic Model to the Teaching of Technology to Special Education Students Almost thirty years ago, the American federal government passed an act mandating the availability of a free and appropriate public education for all handicapped children. In 1990, this act was updated and reformed as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which itself was reformed in 1997. At each step, the goal was to make education more equitable and more
Societal Forces on Education Childhood obesity is a serious social problem in America. The effects of obesity in childhood are well documented in both the social science literature and medical journals. During the last 30 years, the percentage of obese children between the ages of 6 and 11 has risen 200% while the percentage of obese children between 12 and 19 has tripled (CDC, Preventing Childhood Obesity, 2010). Obesity in
Murray characterizes educational romantics as people who believe that the academic achievement of children is determined mainly by the opportunities they receive and has little to do with their intellectual capacity. Educational romantics believe the current K-12 education system is in need of vast improvement. Murray describes two types of educational romantics, one set on the Left and one on the Right, and differentiates between the two thusly: "Educational romantics of
OCR recognizes that colleges and universities are under a lot of legal and political pressure to stop using racial and ethnic factors in admission," Clegg commented. "[In response,] the agency wants to intimidate colleges and universities to continue using these preferences." (Black Issues in Higher Education, 1999) The National Association of Scholars, while raising doubts about the reasoning behind the OCR document titled "Nondiscrimination in High-Stakes Testing," pointed to what it
Educational Leadership in Latino Students Flow of Information: Introduction/Preliminary Lit Analysis Status of Performance of Latino Students Why Study Latinos? Why the Latino Performance is Low? How to change the situation? Los Angeles Specific Data/Information Increase & Improve Teacher/School Parent Communication Train the teachers - Development Improve Substitute Teaching Set High Expectations Latino Experience in Princeton Tracking of Students' Performance - Is it Right? Latino Para-Educator Vs Latino Student How do teacher expectations affect student outcomes? This study was intended to investigate whether teacher expectation of
(Thompson, Morse, Sharpe and Hall, 2005, p.40) The work of Vaughn, Levy, Coleman and Bos (2002) entitled: "Reading Instruction for Students with LD and EBD" published in the Journal of Special Education repots a synthesis of "previous observation studies conducted during reading with students with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD)." (p.1) a systematic process of review of research conducted between 1975 and 2000 is stated to have "yielded