Separation Of Powers Term Paper

Separation of Powers: The United States Constitution protects the right to impeach public officials and provides the procedures and grounds for such measures. According to this constitution, civil servants in America shall be impeached for conviction of bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors, and treason. President Adam Johnson is one of the U.S. presidents who have been impeached while President Richard Nixon resigned before impeachment. President Bill Clinton faced impeachment during his tenure, which contributed to concerns that such an action could contribute to weakened presidency. The impeachment trials of these three presidents present some ethical dilemmas that were evident in the Senate's trial proceedings and political aspects. Moreover, these impeachment trials have certain similarities and differences that were fueled by the actions of the presidents in question.

Impeachment Trial of the Three Presidents:

President Adam Johnson was removed from office in May 1868 when the Senate voted unanimously to remove him from office. The main reason for his impeachment trial was alleged violation of the Tenure of Office Act, though there were other reasons attributed to it. The trial can be regarded as a political trial because it also included trial on his lenient Reconstruction policies and his rejections of the Freedman's Bureau Act and the Civil Rights Act (Linder, n.d.). Upon his assumption to office, some Republicans in Congress opposed President Johnson's too-lenient policies toward reconstruction, which was contrary to their theory of reconstruction.

Impeachment calls against President Johnson started to gain ground after the massacre in New Orleans that fueled the animosity between the president and the Republican Congress. These Republicans complained about Johnson's generous use of the pardon power, public drunkenness, and rumors that he was a major factor in the plot to assassinate Lincoln. Johnson's opposition to the Fourteenth Amendment and campaign for its defeat intensified impeachment efforts, which gained more ground following his violation of Tenure of Office Act in 1867.

President Richard Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974 at a time when his impeachment seemed inevitable. The impeachment...

...

Nixon's impeachment trials were fueled by his subsequent behavior to cover-up the burglary and decline to turn over evidence. These were coupled by allegations of illegitimate wiretapping, obstruction of justice, perjury, abuses of executive power, bribery, and misuse of the CIA (Brunner, 2007). The inevitable impeachment was based on Nixon's action in ways that were divergent to his trust as president and subversive constitutional government.
President Bill Clinton is remembered as the most investigated president in America's history because of the nature of the impeachment trial he faced. Clinton was investigated because of his personal flaws and bitter partisanship relationship that characterized his two presidential terms. His impeachment trial was based on allegations of sexual harassment by Paula Jones and illicit extra-marital affair with Monica Lewinsky, a former White House intern. However, while the House of Representatives only approved two articles related to the illicit extra-marital affair, eleven impeachable offenses had been submitted to the House Judiciary Committee ("The Clinton Impeachment," n.d.).

Ethical Dilemmas in Each Case:

These impeachment trials consist of varying impeachment dilemmas that were brought against each President. The ethical dilemma in Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial was whether he deserved to be removed from office because of being a blowhard or violation of the Tenure of Office Act. Actually, while the impeachment had its own value, it channeled the widespread anger against President Johnson into a morality issue. Based on the reasons presented to the Senate, Johnson should have not been removed from office because of his violation of the act and being a blowhard. The Senate's actions were largely unethical and politically motivated since they were based on political partisanship that characterized Johnson's presidency. The Senate also demonstrated political motivation and unethical actions by including Johnson's public drunkenness and accusations of involvement in Lincoln's assassination in the impeachment trials. The ethical dilemma…

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

Brunner, B. (2007). A Short History of Impeachment. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://www.infoplease.com/spot/impeach.html

Linder, D.O. (n.d.). The Impeachment Trial of Andrew Johnson. Retrieved from University of Missouri-Kansas City -- UMKC School of Law website: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/imp_account2.html

"The Clinton Impeachment." (n.d.). Bill of Rights Institute. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/lessons-plans/presidents/clinton-impeachment/

Whittington, K.E. (2000, March). Bill Clinton was No Andrew Johnson: Comparing Two
Impeachments. Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 422-465. Retrieved from https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/conlaw/articles/volume2/issue2/Whittington2U.Pa.J.Const.L.422(2000).pdf


Cite this Document:

"Separation Of Powers" (2013, September 10) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/separation-of-powers-95969

"Separation Of Powers" 10 September 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/separation-of-powers-95969>

"Separation Of Powers", 10 September 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/separation-of-powers-95969

Related Documents

Separation Anxiety Disorder is an anxiety disorder strongly connected to the idea of attachment relationship. This condition is typically associated with childhood diagnosis, as children are more vulnerable to suffering from it. Even with this, separation anxiety disorder is also likely to occur in adults who are separated from home or from individuals to whom they have a strong emotional attachment. Individuals with separation anxiety disorder are probable to put

Separation of Powers
PAGES 3 WORDS 1034

Separation of Powers It is well-known fact that political power is a very dynamic sphere of human relations and there is no doubt that democratic system is the most progressive result of complicated process of society development. Every citizen of any real democratic society knows that government is called to protect his individual rights and interests but at the same time it is clear from the pages of history that state

S. Constitution and to resolve issues of law and any conflicts between the laws of individual states and the Constitution (Dershowitz, 2002). Several modern cases have required the Judicial Branch to apply the checks and balances principle to unconstitutional actions by the other branches of government. In 1983, the Supreme Court prohibited the Legislative Branch from vetoing decisions issued by the Executive Branch (as represented by the Attorney General) arising in the

"They were informed by the committee that they could assert a claim of 'executive privilege' as a justification for not answering questions and not providing the documents, but they had to do that by appearing and making that claim in front of the committee. They were not simply free to ignore a lawful subpoena to appear. In short, nobody was above the law." (Weiner). However, even though they were

To stimulate economic development and fiscal growth, local, state and federal governments work in tandem with the private sector. Urban planning can therefore be a highly political endeavor. Urban planning involves large-scale land-use projects that involve political decisions. For example, how to zone a metropolitan region is a political issue. Should new schools be built in neighborhoods with higher property taxes because the residents of those neighborhoods can afford them?

" 1 January 1802. Library of Congress. 19 September 2010 . Primary source document from the Library of Congress, the original text of the correspondence between Jefferson and the Danbury Baptists. Johnston, P. "A Historical Argument Against the Separation of Church and State." January 2008. Right Remedy. September 2010 . Authored by a clergyman, this website collected quotations from a number of political figures, legal documents, and primary source materials to show that