The Anomie Strain Theories Crime Control Essay

Crime Control

The Anomie/Strain theories have been discussed by four sociologist who sought to explain why deviant behaviors occur. The most common Anomie theories are stated by Robert Merton and Emile Durkheim. Many individuals in society are affected by societal control that makes their lives miserable. For example, an individual could be well-learned, have a legitimate means of income and live a good life in comparison to others. However, some of these individuals could feel incomplete or are controlled by the norms of society which limit them to live in a certain manner. Such individuals could end up committing atrocities as a consequence of mental and emotional strain. These individuals mostly fight personal feelings against the norms of the society. For instance, according to Brezina (2012), some are unable to adapt to the new norms due to resistance to change, while others simply fail to embody the norms embraced by society. Therefore, the standards set by society results in individuals developing mental health issues and deviant behaviors. This paper will explain the Anomies theories and develop a policy that will help in crime control, with reference to the theory.

Anomies can also be associated with the gap that exists between the means and objectives or goals. For instance, many individuals from different statuses aspire to lead a successful life amidst the challenges they face on a daily basis. However, the pressure and strain they get from society leads them to develop deviant behaviors. These behaviors make individuals get involved in criminal activities to gain American culture of working hard and achieving success, but are provided with less resources to achieve anything meaningful. Unlike the high and middle class individuals, low-class people rarely get education or training opportunities that would help them lead a successful life as set by society. Therefore, they get innovative and develop hustles or jobs that help them gain social status and wealth through illegal means. These illegal jobs include high status call girl engagements, drug trafficking, human trafficking, collecting ransoms from kidnapping people, weapon trafficking, among others. Other individuals retreat from following the rules and norms created by society and set out to create new ones, where they create new objectives and means of achieving them - for instance terrorists. Merton also discusses individuals who abandon having goals and societal norms. Examples of such individuals include drug addicts and alcoholics who abandon their goals and jobs to focus on getting their next drug dose through means like stealing, borrowing or begging.

Therefore, the anomies mentioned above lead to an increase in criminal activities and many mental health issues as depicted by the criminals. There are several mental health policies that assist in controlling crime within society. Many individuals involved in criminal activities are affected by mental health issues and develop deviant behaviors because the public does not understand or feel the need to support them in their situations. Mental health…

Sources Used in Documents:

References


Bolton, D. & Dinesh, B. (2020). Changes in society and young people’s mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, 4(3), 11-18.


Timothy, B. (2012). Routledge Handbook of Deviant Behavior. Routledge.


Featherstone, R. &Mathieu, D. (2003). Anomie and strain: Context and consequences of Merton's two theories. Sociological inquiry, 73(4), 471-489.



Cite this Document:

"The Anomie Strain Theories Crime Control" (2021, June 26) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/anomie-strain-theories-crime-control-essay-2176352

"The Anomie Strain Theories Crime Control" 26 June 2021. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/anomie-strain-theories-crime-control-essay-2176352>

"The Anomie Strain Theories Crime Control", 26 June 2021, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/anomie-strain-theories-crime-control-essay-2176352

Related Documents

Within American communities with the highest crime rates, the dynamic relationship between motivated criminals and the myriad opportunities perpetually available in their communities contributes to a continuing cycle of multigenerational crime. Moreover, the simultaneous domination of criminal gang culture in conjunction with patterns of social and institutional responses to crime in poor communities on the part of the government also greatly exacerbated the problem. The Role of Parents, Society, and

Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model In this paper we shall examine and differentiate between two "ideal type" models of the criminal process: the Crime Control Model and the Due Process Model. Crime control underlines an efficient criminal procedure by means of early determination of responsibility by law enforcement representatives (Aviram, 2010). The model necessitates considerable reverence to police officers and prosecutors, the "torchbearers" of the criminal process (Feeley,

Evolution of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 Most Americans regard the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 as the most comprehensive and far-reaching anti-crime bill in the country's history. The Act, which took up more than 1000 pages and an approximate $30 billion in costs, covered an overwhelming array of areas ranging from funding for late-night youth basketball programs to a ban on

Conflict/Crime Control Model vs. The Consensus/Due Process Model Over the years, theorists have developed several theories to describe crime as a social phenomenon. Two of today's most popular theories are the conflict/crime control model and the consensus/due process model. Both theories attempt to explain the origins of crime, but they approach crime from two very different perspectives. The conflict/crime control model is focused on crime control and aims to enforce the

To the extent criminal behavior is actually a result of spontaneous choice, it might be perfectly appropriate as a societal response to crime. On the other hand, to the extent criminal behavior is only partially attributable to spontaneous choice, the classical approach to crime control is inherently ineffective and unlikely to achieve the larger objective of reducing crime in society. Furthermore, the classical approach to crime control is unlikely to