Verified Document

Apportioning Greater Emphasis On The Criminal Motive In Hate Crimes Essay

HATE CRIMES

Hate Crimes: The Need to Apportion Greater Emphasis on the Criminal Motive

From the onset, it would be prudent to note that there is no universal definition for hate crimes. This essentially means that in the past, various definitions have been floated by multiple authors in an attempt to assign meaning to hate crimes. In this text, the definition that the Hate Crime Statistics Act establishes will be embraced. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS (2021), hate crime has been defined by this particular Act as crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, gender or gender identity, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. This is to say that on this front, it is what the victim is (or is perceived to be) that prompts, inspires, or motivates hate crime. Hate crime could take a wide range of forms including, but not limited to, humiliation, harassment, and degradation. It could also manifest as actual physical violence that may result in serious injury or death. Available data indicates that reported incidences of hate crime have been on the increase in the recent past. For instance, according to the Department of Justice DOJ (2023), nationally, reported hate crime incidents increased 11.6% from 8,210 in 2020 to 9,065 in 2021.

In as far as consequences are concerned, Mellgren, Anderson, and Ivert (2017) are categorical that in comparison to other regular or parallel crimes, hate crimes tend to have repercussions that are more severe. More specifically, as the authors indicate, hate crimes have been found to have more severe consequences than other parallel crimes that were not motivated by the offenders' hostility toward someone because of their real or perceived difference (Mellgren, Anderson, and Ivert, 2017). To a large extent, hate crimes have the unique capability or potential to influence or shape attitudes and behaviors at present and in the future. Thus, their impact could be felt for generations to come. It should further be noted that unlike other kinds of crime, hate crime has an additional element of prejudice against a larger constituency, and not only the targeted individual. Indeed, as Dalton, Lint and Palmer (2010) point out, perpetrators of hate crimes are motivated by the intolerance, hostility, as well as hatred that they harbor against certain categories or groups of people. Thus, in comparison to ordinary crimes, a larger constituency is often hurt by hate crime. It is for this very reason that the criminal motive should carry greater weight than the criminal act on this front. Further, it is also important to note that Lieberman (2010) makes an observation to the effect that very few individual crimes can trigger widespread disturbances that threaten...

…victim. It is the intentional selection of victims, the potential for hate crime to shape future attitudes and behaviors, and its potential to trigger social disturbances that make hate crime particularly dangerous. Dalton, Lint and Palmer (2010) capture this perspective best with their assertion to the effect that hate crimes are themselves worse because the perpetrator chooses the victim because of the immutable characteristics that in the past were the basis for major enemy wars (179).

In the final analysis, it would be prudent to note that as this discussion indicates, punishing hate crimes more severely does indeed serve the greater societal good. There is, thus, basis for greater emphasis being placed on the criminal motive as opposed to the criminal act. Lieberman (2010) quotes Sir William Blackstone as having pointed out that it is but reasonable that among crimes of different natures those should be most severely punished, which are the most destructive of the public safety and happiness. As has been demonstrated in this write-up, crimes in which victims are selected based on what they are (or are perceived to be) are particularly odious. This is more so the case if we are consider their real and potential negative impact on not only the victim, but also the society at large. For this reason, there exists a valid reason for hate crimes to be…

Sources used in this document:

References

Bureau of Justice Statistics – BJS (2021). Bias-Motivated/Hate Crime. https://bjs.ojp.gov/topics/crime/hate-crime

Department of Justice – DOJ (2023). Updated 2021 Hate Crime Statistics: FBI Releases Supplement to the 2021 Hate Crime Statistics. https://www.justice.gov/crs/highlights/2021-hate-crime-statistics

Dalton, D., Lint, W.D. & Palmer, D. (2010). Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology. Thomson Reuters.

Lieberman, M. (2010). Hate Crime Laws: Punishment to Fit the Crime. ADL. https://www.adl.org/resources/news/hate-crime-laws-punishment-fit-crime

Mellgren, C., Anderson, M. & Ivert, A. (2017). For Whom Does Hate Crime Hurt More? A Comparison of Consequences of Victimization across Motives and Crime Types. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3-4), 1512-1536. DOI: 10.1177/0886260517746131Novotney, A. (2023). Hate crimes are on the rise in the U.S. What are the psychological effects? American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/topics/gun-violence-crime/hate-crimes

Spakovsky, H.A. & Perry, S.P. (2021). Hate Crimes: Should They Be Prosecuted More Aggressively? The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/hate-crimes-should-they-be-prosecuted-more-aggressively

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Hate Crimes the Definition of
Words: 6466 Length: 20 Document Type: Term Paper

C. By Michael Shively (June, 2005), the first hate crime laws were enacted during the sixties, seventies, and eighties. The first states to pass hate crime legislation were Oregon and Washington in 1981. The first federal hate crime legislation, Shively explains, was debated in 1985, and the first federal statute related to hate crimes was the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, passed in 1990. Subsequent to that Act, other pieces of

Hate Crime Analysis Select Group Population Target
Words: 1533 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Hate Crime Analysis Select group population target a hate crime ( selection start paper) Write a word analysis: • Provide a description specific factors serve basis victimization;, race, religion, sexual orientation • Identify applicable specific case examples. When considering hate in general, it appears that human beings are vulnerable to being influenced to discriminate others. Even though many have little to no reasons to discriminate against other groups, these people feel

Hate Crimes Incidents Occur Nationally Between 6,000
Words: 2321 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Hate crimes incidents occur nationally between 6,000 and 8,000 times annually, and many be increased by traumatic national events. Hate crime rates spiked in 2001, but have steadily decreased since then, though hate crimes between religious groups have increased slightly. Most offenders are young and act more out of personal sentiment than organizational strategy, which may be why hate crimes in Pennsylvania are mainly centered around the two big cities

Hate Crimes Historical Origins of
Words: 2496 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

In the case of an extreme situation, such as the death or near death of another, intentionality is a clear indicator of culpability and should be constitutionally supported. The constitution is a litmus of the culture and open violation of the intentions of the constitution, i.e. To protect the rights of all should be an allowable designation for increased sanctions against those who perpetrate such crime. Pros and Cons of

Hate Crimes in the United States Despite
Words: 730 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Hate Crimes in the United States Despite the fact that the United States has grown generally more tolerant and more accepting, hate crimes have been on the rise in many cities in the United States, particularly in California, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, and Massachusetts (Partners against Hate, 2003). This does not necessarily reflect an overall increase in crime. In fact, it may not even reflect an increase in actual hate

Hate Crimes a Hate Crime
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

3. 42 U.S.C.S. 13981 - the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 IV. Famous Hate Crimes Matthew Shepard was attacked and killed by Russell Henderson and Aaron McKinney on October 12, 1998. The attack was motivated by Shepard's homosexuality. The case brought national attention to the issue of hate crimes. Shepard's killers were convicted of murder, but not charged with a hate crime because there was no Wyoming hate crime legislation at that time. Brandon

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now