Hate Crimes A Hate Crime Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
1015
Cite

The attack was motivated by Shepard's homosexuality. The case brought national attention to the issue of hate crimes.

Shepard's killers were convicted of murder, but not charged with a hate crime because there was no Wyoming hate crime legislation at that time.

Brandon Teena was raped on December 24, 1993, and later murdered on December 31, 1993 by John Lotter and Marvin Nissen. Their attacks were motivated by Brandon's transgender status.

The story was the subject of the movie "Boys Don't Cry."

The criminal cases against the defendants are ongoing.

a. Nissen

1) Pled to being an accessory and testified against Lotter.

2) Received a life sentence.

3) Appealed his sentence.

4) Recanted his testimony against Lotter on September 20, b. Lotter

1) Was convicted of murder.

2) Received the death penalty.

3) His sentence and conviction are currently under appeal.

James Byrd, Jr. was murdered by Shawn Allen Berry, Lawrence Russel Brewer, and John William King on June 7, 1998 in Jasper, Texas. The murder was motivated by Byrd's race.

1. A KKK lighter was found with Byrd's body.

2. The killing was brutal- Byrd was beaten, then tied to back of a pickup truck and dragged for approximately three miles; evidence suggests he was alive during this prison.

5. The crime was charged as a hate crime, and its racial overtones were emphasized by the similarity to lynchings.

The Jena Six case emphasizes the danger of retaliation and escalation in hate crime cases. After white students reportedly hung a noose from a tree at a high school in Jena, Louisiana, tensions between white and black students escalated. The culmination was that six African-American students beat up a white student, Justin Barker. Barker does not appear to have been involved in the prior incidents, but may have used racial epitaphs towards the defendants. Five of the six defendants were charged with attempted second-degree murder.

Mychal Bell was convicted, but his conviction was overturned, and he subsequently pled guilty when charged as a juvenile.

Charges are pending against the remaining adult defendants.

People rallied to support the Jena Six, alleging that they were treated much more harshly than white students who had committed similar crimes.

A further criticism is that, if officials had responded to the hate crimes, such as the hanging of the noose at the school, the problem would not have escalated.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Anti-Defamation League. (2006). Hate crime laws: federal initiatives. Retrieved January 29, 2008 from the Anti-Defamation League.

Web site: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/federal.asp

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Hate crime. Retrieved January 29, 2008 from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Web site: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/hate.htm
Turner, N. (2008). Responding to hate crimes: a police officer's guide to investigation and prevention. Retrieved January 29, 2008 from International Association of Chiefs of Police. Web site: http://www.theiacp.org/documents/index.cfm?fuseaction=document&document_id=141


Cite this Document:

"Hate Crimes A Hate Crime" (2008, January 29) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hate-crimes-a-hate-crime-32587

"Hate Crimes A Hate Crime" 29 January 2008. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hate-crimes-a-hate-crime-32587>

"Hate Crimes A Hate Crime", 29 January 2008, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hate-crimes-a-hate-crime-32587

Related Documents

C. By Michael Shively (June, 2005), the first hate crime laws were enacted during the sixties, seventies, and eighties. The first states to pass hate crime legislation were Oregon and Washington in 1981. The first federal hate crime legislation, Shively explains, was debated in 1985, and the first federal statute related to hate crimes was the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, passed in 1990. Subsequent to that Act, other pieces of

Hate is in fact moving the modern society away from freedom and democracy, and it is imperative that remedial measures are taken immediately to combat this. (Shulman, 1997) Some of the tools, other than legal options, can be education, and the promotion of social interaction between different groups. However, there are frequent criticisms of the law, stating that it is more 'reactive' than 'proactive', meaning that legal remedies are more

Hate crimes incidents occur nationally between 6,000 and 8,000 times annually, and many be increased by traumatic national events. Hate crime rates spiked in 2001, but have steadily decreased since then, though hate crimes between religious groups have increased slightly. Most offenders are young and act more out of personal sentiment than organizational strategy, which may be why hate crimes in Pennsylvania are mainly centered around the two big cities

Hate Crimes in the United States Despite the fact that the United States has grown generally more tolerant and more accepting, hate crimes have been on the rise in many cities in the United States, particularly in California, New York, New Jersey, Michigan, and Massachusetts (Partners against Hate, 2003). This does not necessarily reflect an overall increase in crime. In fact, it may not even reflect an increase in actual hate

In the case of an extreme situation, such as the death or near death of another, intentionality is a clear indicator of culpability and should be constitutionally supported. The constitution is a litmus of the culture and open violation of the intentions of the constitution, i.e. To protect the rights of all should be an allowable designation for increased sanctions against those who perpetrate such crime. Pros and Cons of

Levin (1992, cited in Nolan & Akiyama, 1999) notes that police officers tend to identify crimes based on the severity of injury or the magnitude of property damage and not on the basis of motive. There are many thinkers and writers that question the legitimacy of hate or bias crime laws on the basis that they violate a fundamental democratic principle by punishing individuals for their prejudiced thoughts and beliefs